CBP and p300 Jointly Maintain Neural Progenitor Viability but Play Unique Roles in the Differentiation of Neural Lineages.
CBP
Rubinstein–Taybi syndrome
epigenetics
epigenomics
intellectual disability
lysine acetylation
neural progenitor proliferation
neuronal differentiation
p300
transcriptomics
Journal
Cells
ISSN: 2073-4409
Titre abrégé: Cells
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101600052
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 12 2022
18 12 2022
Historique:
received:
31
10
2022
revised:
15
12
2022
accepted:
15
12
2022
entrez:
23
12
2022
pubmed:
24
12
2022
medline:
27
12
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The paralogous lysine acetyltransferases 3 (KAT3), CBP and P300, play critical roles during neurodevelopment, but their specific roles in neural precursors maintenance and differentiation remain obscure. In fact, it is still unclear whether these proteins are individually or jointly essential in processes such as proliferation of neural precursors, differentiation to specific neural cell types, or both. Here, we use subventricular zone-derived neurospheres as a potential ex vivo developmental model to analyze the proliferation and differentiation of neural stem cells (NSCs) lacking CBP, p300, or both proteins. The results showed that CBP and p300 are not individually essential for maintenance and proliferation of NSCs, although their combined ablation seriously compromised cell division. In turn, the absence of either of the two proteins compromised the differentiation of NSC into the neuronal and astrocytic lineages. Single-nucleus RNA sequencing analysis of neural cell cultures derived from CBP or p300 mutant neurospheres revealed divergent trajectories of neural differentiation upon CBP or p300 ablation, confirming unique functions and nonredundant roles in neural development. These findings contribute to a better understanding of the shared and individual roles of KAT3 proteins in neural differentiation and the etiology of neurodevelopmental disorders caused by their deficiency.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36552882
pii: cells11244118
doi: 10.3390/cells11244118
pmc: PMC9777331
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
Cell Rep. 2021 Jun 8;35(10):109229
pubmed: 34107264
Mol Neurobiol. 2020 Sep;57(9):3685-3701
pubmed: 32562237
Nature. 2021 Aug;596(7870):92-96
pubmed: 34321664
Nat Biotechnol. 2018 Jun;36(5):411-420
pubmed: 29608179
Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2018 Aug;45:195-203
pubmed: 30025258
Mol Cell Biol. 2006 Feb;26(3):789-809
pubmed: 16428436
Cell. 2019 Jun 13;177(7):1888-1902.e21
pubmed: 31178118
Cytotechnology. 2011 Dec;63(6):621-31
pubmed: 21858692
J Neurosci. 2012 Jun 6;32(23):7771-81
pubmed: 22674254
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2019 Dec;59:1-8
pubmed: 30856481
Dev Biol. 1999 Apr 1;208(1):166-88
pubmed: 10075850
EMBO J. 2003 Oct 1;22(19):5186-96
pubmed: 14517256
Cell. 1998 May 1;93(3):361-72
pubmed: 9590171
Nat Commun. 2020 May 22;11(1):2588
pubmed: 32444594
Dev Cell. 2010 Jan 19;18(1):114-25
pubmed: 20152182
J Biol Chem. 2001 Aug 10;276(32):30467-74
pubmed: 11399758
Nucleic Acids Res. 2002 Jan 1;30(1):207-10
pubmed: 11752295
Neuron. 2009 Jun 11;62(5):641-54
pubmed: 19524524
Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 Sep;41(17):8072-84
pubmed: 23821663
Nat Methods. 2006 Oct;3(10):801-6
pubmed: 16990812
J Neurosci. 2013 Feb 13;33(7):3240-50
pubmed: 23407977
Differentiation. 2016 Apr-Jun;91(4-5):28-41
pubmed: 27016251
Annu Rev Biochem. 2007;76:75-100
pubmed: 17362198
Science. 1992 Mar 27;255(5052):1707-10
pubmed: 1553558
Cell. 2021 Jun 10;184(12):3222-3241.e26
pubmed: 34004146
Genesis. 2004 Oct;40(2):82-9
pubmed: 15452871
Nat Protoc. 2007;2(4):849-859
pubmed: 17474182
Acta Neuropsychiatr. 2008 Feb;20(1):2-8
pubmed: 26953088
Mech Dev. 2000 Jul;95(1-2):133-45
pubmed: 10906457
J Neurosci Res. 2004 Dec 15;78(6):761-9
pubmed: 15505793
EMBO J. 2003 Oct 1;22(19):5175-85
pubmed: 14517255