Computer-Aided Assessment of Three-Dimensional Standard Bone Morphology of the Distal Radius.

computed tomography computer-aided diagnosis distal radius osteosynthesis three dimensions

Journal

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2075-4418
Titre abrégé: Diagnostics (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101658402

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
17 Dec 2022
Historique:
received: 07 11 2022
revised: 07 12 2022
accepted: 15 12 2022
entrez: 23 12 2022
pubmed: 24 12 2022
medline: 24 12 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The present study attempted to define the three-dimensional (3D) locations of reference points and standard measures of the distal radius of a normal wrist joint. One hundred wrists from 50 males and 50 females who matched the age distribution (19−95 years old, mean: 56.0 years old) were evaluated. Computed tomography (CT) images of normal wrist joints acquired for comparison with the affected side were used. The absence of a previous history and complaints in the unaffected wrist was confirmed in an interview and with medical records. Three-dimensional images of the distal radius were reconstructed using the data obtained from CT scans. The site at which the major axis of the radial diaphysis contacted the distal radius joint surface was defined as the origin. The 3D coordinates of reference points for the radial styloid process (1), sigmoid notch volar edge (2), and sigmoid notch dorsal edge (3) as well as the barycenter for the joint surface and joint surface area were evaluated. A slope of the line connecting coordinates 1−2 in the coronal plane was evaluated as the 3D radial inclination (3DRI) and that connecting coordinates 2−3 in the sagittal plane as the 3D palmar tilt (3DPT). Each measurement value was compared between males and females. The positions of each reference point from the origin were as follows: (1) 14.2 ± 1.3/12.6 ± 1.1 mm for the distal-palmar-radial position; (2) 19.3 ± 1.3/16.9 ± 1.3 mm for the proximal-palmar-ulnar position; (3) 15.6 ± 1.4/14.1 ± 0.9 mm for the proximal-dorsal-ulnar position; and (barycenter) 4.1 ± 0.7/3.7 ± 0.7 mm for the proximal-volar-ulnar position for males and females, respectively. The areas of the radius articular surface were 429.0 ± 67.9/347.6 ± 44.6 mm2 for males and females, respectively. The 3DRI and 3DPT were 24.2 ± 4.0/25.7 ± 3.1° and 10.9 ± 5.1/13.2 ± 4.4° for males and females, respectively. Significant differences were observed in all measurement values between males and females (p < 0.01). The reference points and measured values obtained in the present study will serve as criteria for identifying the dislocation direction and reduction conditions of distal radius fractures in 3D images.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36553219
pii: diagnostics12123212
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12123212
pmc: PMC9777835
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Références

J Hand Surg Am. 1996 Jan;21(1):31-9
pubmed: 8775193
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Feb;99(8):e19259
pubmed: 32080133
Croat Med J. 2003 Dec;44(6):740-5
pubmed: 14652889
Clin Orthop Surg. 2018 Dec;10(4):462-467
pubmed: 30505415
J Orthop Res. 2017 Dec;35(12):2646-2651
pubmed: 28407287
Clin Anat. 2019 Apr;32(3):361-368
pubmed: 30521090
Front Surg. 2015 Dec 23;2:66
pubmed: 26779486
Int J Med Robot. 2009 Dec;5(4):452-7
pubmed: 19722285
Clin Anat. 2021 May;34(4):574-580
pubmed: 32346905
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2021 Feb;46(2):176-183
pubmed: 33148107
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Apr 18;11(4):
pubmed: 33919594
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1951 Oct;33-A(4):895-907
pubmed: 14880544
Hand Clin. 1988 Aug;4(3):377-90
pubmed: 3049632
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Apr 15;21(1):245
pubmed: 32293404
J Hand Microsurg. 2016 Apr;8(1):27-33
pubmed: 27551165
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Feb 12;16(1):131
pubmed: 33579338
BMC Med Imaging. 2020 Apr 3;20(1):35
pubmed: 32245428
BMC Med Imaging. 2017 Mar 9;17(1):23
pubmed: 28274212
Orthop Clin North Am. 1993 Apr;24(2):217-28
pubmed: 8479720
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 May 30;58(6):
pubmed: 35744007
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2020 May;45(4):339-347
pubmed: 31722638
J Hand Surg Am. 2001 May;26(3):415-21
pubmed: 11418901

Auteurs

Akira Ikumi (A)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tsukuba University Hospital, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8576, Japan.

Yuichi Yoshii (Y)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tokyo Medical University Ibaraki Medical Center, Ami, Ibaraki 300-0395, Japan.

Yusuke Eda (Y)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mito Kyodo General Hospital, Mito, Ibaraki 310-0015, Japan.

Tomoo Ishii (T)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tokyo Medical University Ibaraki Medical Center, Ami, Ibaraki 300-0395, Japan.

Classifications MeSH