Oral Anticoagulant Use and Appropriateness in Elderly Patients with Atrial Fibrillation in Complex Clinical Conditions: ACONVENIENCE Study.
anticoagulants
antithrombins
atrial fibrillation
bleeding
drug interactions
factor Xa inhibitors
frail elderly
geriatric assessment
stroke
Journal
Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 Dec 2022
14 Dec 2022
Historique:
received:
09
11
2022
revised:
05
12
2022
accepted:
08
12
2022
entrez:
23
12
2022
pubmed:
24
12
2022
medline:
24
12
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) is the most common arrhythmia in older patients. Although direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are the antithrombotic treatment of choice, irrespective of age, certain factors may limit their use. The aim of the ACONVENIENCE study was to consult the opinion of a multidisciplinary panel of experts on the appropriateness of using OACs in elderly patients (>75 years) with NVAF associated with certain complex clinical conditions. A consensus project was performed on the basis of a systematic review of the literature, and application of a two-round Delphi survey. The agreement of 79 panellists on 30 Delphi-type statements was evaluated, and their opinion on the appropriateness of different oral anticoagulants in 16 complex clinical scenarios was assessed. A total of 27 consensus statements were agreed upon, including all statements addressing anticoagulation in older patients and in patients at high risk of bleeding complications, and most of those addressing frailty, dementia, risk of falling, and complex cardiac situations. It was almost unanimously agreed upon that advanced age should not influence the anticoagulation decision. Apixaban was the highest-rated therapeutic option in 14/16 situations, followed by edoxaban. There is a high degree of agreement on anticoagulation in older patients with NVAF. Age should not be the single limiting factor when prescribing OACs, and the decision should be made based on net clinical benefit and a comprehensive geriatric assessment. Apixaban, followed by edoxaban, was considered the most appropriate treatment in the various complex clinical situations examined.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36556039
pii: jcm11247423
doi: 10.3390/jcm11247423
pmc: PMC9781896
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : Bristol Myers Squibb-Pfizer
ID : NA
Références
J Clin Med. 2022 May 26;11(11):
pubmed: 35683397
J Clin Med. 2021 Nov 12;10(22):
pubmed: 34830548
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2022 Sep 29;8(7):660-667
pubmed: 34279598
Lancet. 2016 May 21;387(10033):2145-2154
pubmed: 26520231
Am J Med. 2019 Jun;132(6):749-757.e5
pubmed: 30664837
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Feb 16;7(4):
pubmed: 29453305
Chest. 2010 Feb;137(2):263-72
pubmed: 19762550
Heart Vessels. 2016 Jan;31(1):118-23
pubmed: 25081096
Age Ageing. 2011 Nov;40(6):675-83
pubmed: 21821732
SAGE Open Med Case Rep. 2017 Dec 11;5:2050313X17745211
pubmed: 29276599
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2018 Jun;71(6):380-387
pubmed: 29528873
Am J Med. 2018 Mar;131(3):269-275.e2
pubmed: 29122636
Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol. 2018 Nov - Dec;53(6):344-355
pubmed: 30072184
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2013 Jul;66(7):561-5
pubmed: 24776206
Circulation. 2011 May 31;123(21):2363-72
pubmed: 21576658
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2017 Nov;44(4):519-524
pubmed: 28948507
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2021 Aug;52(2):517-522
pubmed: 33420896
Europace. 2021 Oct 9;23(10):1612-1676
pubmed: 33895845
Am J Med. 2015 Sep;128(9):1007-14.e2
pubmed: 25910790
JAMA. 1994 Mar 16;271(11):840-4
pubmed: 8114238
Circulation. 2015 Jan 13;131(2):157-64
pubmed: 25359164
Chest. 2010 Nov;138(5):1093-100
pubmed: 20299623
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2018 Apr;24(3):519-524
pubmed: 28068791
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2011 Apr;36(2):166-71
pubmed: 21366645
Adv Ther. 2021 Jun;38(6):2891-2907
pubmed: 34019247
Eur J Clin Invest. 2020 Mar;50(3):e13200
pubmed: 31953953
J Atr Fibrillation. 2018 Apr 30;10(6):1870
pubmed: 29988282
Age Ageing. 2019 Mar 1;48(2):196-203
pubmed: 30445608
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2019 Mar - Apr;81:209-214
pubmed: 30612074
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Sep 7;56(11):827-37
pubmed: 20813280
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014 May;62(5):857-64
pubmed: 24786913
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Sep 13;68(11):1169-1178
pubmed: 27609678
ACP J Club. 1995 Nov-Dec;123(3):A12-3
pubmed: 7582737
N Engl J Med. 2011 Sep 15;365(11):981-92
pubmed: 21870978
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Aug;65(8):1684-1690
pubmed: 28394435
N Engl J Med. 2019 Apr 4;380(14):1326-1335
pubmed: 30730782
Eur Heart J. 2019 Jul 21;40(28):2327-2335
pubmed: 31095295
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Apr 5;11(7):e023098
pubmed: 35301852
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 May 20;5(5):
pubmed: 27207971
Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498
pubmed: 32860505
N Engl J Med. 2013 Nov 28;369(22):2093-104
pubmed: 24251359
Am J Med. 2019 Jul;132(7):847-855.e3
pubmed: 30776320
Eur Heart J. 2014 Jul 21;35(28):1864-72
pubmed: 24561548
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2014 Apr;67(4):259-69
pubmed: 24774588
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 1;15(6):e0231565
pubmed: 32479502
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Dec 20;68(24):2597-2604
pubmed: 27978942
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Mar;21(3):367-373.e1
pubmed: 31753740
Europace. 2020 Mar 1;22(3):361-367
pubmed: 31985781
Heart Rhythm. 2019 Jan;16(1):31-37
pubmed: 30125717
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Jun 4;8(11):e011358
pubmed: 31138001
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015 Dec;16(12):1103.e1-19
pubmed: 26527225
N Engl J Med. 2011 Sep 8;365(10):883-91
pubmed: 21830957
Front Pharmacol. 2020 Sep 09;11:583311
pubmed: 33013422
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2015 Aug;1(4):326-334
pubmed: 29759321
N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 3;377(5):431-441
pubmed: 28693366
Stroke. 2019 Aug;50(8):2093-2100
pubmed: 31221054
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2018 Apr;15(4):268-274
pubmed: 29915616
N Engl J Med. 2009 Sep 17;361(12):1139-51
pubmed: 19717844
Eur Heart J. 2018 Apr 21;39(16):1330-1393
pubmed: 29562325
Front Med (Lausanne). 2019 Aug 08;6:175
pubmed: 31440508
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2021 Sep 21;7(5):398-404
pubmed: 32730627