The Value of Delta Middle Cerebral Artery Peak Systolic Velocity for the Prediction of Twin Anemia-Polycythemia Sequence-Analysis of a Heterogenous Cohort of Monochorionic Twins.
delta MCA-PSV
monochorionic-twins
twin-anemia-polycythemia sequence
twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome
Journal
Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 Dec 2022
19 Dec 2022
Historique:
received:
24
11
2022
revised:
10
12
2022
accepted:
13
12
2022
entrez:
23
12
2022
pubmed:
24
12
2022
medline:
24
12
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Introduction: Twin anemia-polycythemia sequence (TAPS) is a complication in monochorionic-diamniotic (MCDA) twin pregnancies. This study analyzes whether the prenatal diagnosis using delta middle cerebral artery-peak systolic velocity (MCA-PSV) > 0.5 multiples of the median (MoM) (delta group) detects more TAPS cases than the guideline-based diagnosis using the MCA-PSV cut off levels of >1.5 and <1.0 MoM (cut-off group), in a heterogenous group of MCDA twins. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 348 live-born MCDA twin pregnancies from 2010 to 2021 with available information on MCA-PSV within one week before delivery and hemoglobin-values within 24 h postnatally were considered eligible. Results: Among postnatal confirmed twin pairs with TAPS, the cut-off group showed lower sensitivity than the delta group (33% vs. 82%). Specificity proved higher in the cut-off group with 97% than in the delta group at 86%. The risk that a TAPS is mistakenly not recognized prenatally is higher in the cut-off group than in the delta group (52% vs. 18%). Conclusions: Our data shows that delta MCA-PSV > 0.5 MoM detects more cases of TAPS, which would not have been diagnosed prenatally according to the current guidelines. In the collective examined in the present study, TAPS diagnostics using delta MCA-PSV proved to be a more robust method.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36556157
pii: jcm11247541
doi: 10.3390/jcm11247541
pmc: PMC9783345
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Ultraschall Med. 2019 Jun;40(3):319-325
pubmed: 30895584
J Clin Med. 2020 Aug 26;9(9):
pubmed: 32858863
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Oct;48(4):470-475
pubmed: 26663574
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jul;42(1):108-11
pubmed: 23361996
Twin Res Hum Genet. 2016 Jun;19(3):222-33
pubmed: 27068715
J Perinat Med. 2010 Sep;38(5):451-9
pubmed: 20629496
Fetal Diagn Ther. 2010;27(4):181-90
pubmed: 20339296
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Sep;56(3):388-394
pubmed: 31605505
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jun;53(6):794-797
pubmed: 30207009
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jun;53(6):788-793
pubmed: 30125414
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Mar;194(3):796-803
pubmed: 16522415
Placenta. 2007 Jan;28(1):47-51
pubmed: 16516289