A Simplified Approach to Pulmonary Vein Visualization during Cryoballoon Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation.
angiography
atrial fibrillation
cryoballoon
pulmonary vein isolation
Journal
Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)
ISSN: 1648-9144
Titre abrégé: Medicina (Kaunas)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 9425208
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 Nov 2022
22 Nov 2022
Historique:
received:
13
10
2022
revised:
11
11
2022
accepted:
18
11
2022
entrez:
23
12
2022
pubmed:
24
12
2022
medline:
27
12
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Background and Objectives: Selective pulmonary vein (PV) angiography has been established as the gold standard for PV visualization in cryoballoon (CB)-based pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). We sought to simplify this approach to reduce procedural complexity and radiation exposure. Materials and Methods: Patients with paroxysmal and recently diagnosed persistent AF undergoing CB-based PVI from January 2015 to December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients underwent either selective PV angiography or conventional left atrial (LA) angiography for PV visualization. Results: A total of 336 patients were analyzed. A total of 87 patients (26%) received PV angiography and 249 (74%) LA angiography. LA angiography required fewer cine-sequences for PV visualization, translating into a significant reduction in procedure duration, fluoroscopy time and dose area product. Additionally, less contrast medium was utilized. PV occlusion by the CB, CB temperature and time to isolation showed no significant differences. The number of CB applications and total application time (LA angiography: 1.4 ± 0.02 vs. PV Angiography: 1.6 ± 0.05; p < 0.0001; LA angiography: 297.9 ± 4.62 vs. PV-Angiography: 348.9 ± 11.03; p < 0.001, respectively) per vein were slightly but significantly higher in the PV angiography group. We observed no difference in late AF recurrence (24.7% LA angiography vs. 21.3% PV angiography; p = 0.2657). Conclusions: A simplified protocol, using LA angiography for PV visualization, entails a reduction in procedure time and radiation exposure while equally maintaining procedural efficiency and safety in both groups.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36556902
pii: medicina58121700
doi: 10.3390/medicina58121700
pmc: PMC9781762
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
Heart Vessels. 2022 Jan;37(1):115-120
pubmed: 34240266
Europace. 2008 Nov;10 Suppl 3:iii42-7
pubmed: 18955398
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2004 Jan;15(1):21-6
pubmed: 15028068
Europace. 2018 Jan 1;20(1):43-49
pubmed: 27742775
Europace. 2008 Aug;10(8):931-8
pubmed: 18511437
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2003;5(4):545-51
pubmed: 14664132
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Jul 27;6(8):
pubmed: 28751544
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Feb 1;45(3):343-50
pubmed: 15680710
Europace. 2009 Jan;11(1):35-41
pubmed: 19054787
Europace. 2012 Apr;14(4):528-606
pubmed: 22389422
N Engl J Med. 1998 Sep 3;339(10):659-66
pubmed: 9725923
Europace. 2018 Dec 1;20(12):1952-1958
pubmed: 29346552
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Mar;34(3):337-342
pubmed: 28918444
Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2014 Jan 01;14(1):53-9
pubmed: 24493918
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015 Jul;26(7):747-53
pubmed: 25807878
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2006 Mar;17(3):251-5
pubmed: 16643395
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Dec 18;7(24):e010777
pubmed: 30561258
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 25;15(6):e0235132
pubmed: 32584880
Europace. 2006 Aug;8(8):583-7
pubmed: 16831837
Heart Rhythm. 2020 Nov;17(11):1841-1847
pubmed: 32590151