Evaluation of behavioural, chemical, toxicological and clinical studies of a tobacco heated product glo™ and the potential for bridging from a foundational dataset to new product iterations.
Biomarkers of exposure and potential harm
BoE, biomarker of exposure
BoPH, biomarker of potential harm
Bridging
Clinical studies
Regulatory and 21st Century Toxicology
THP, tobacco heating product
TSNA, tobacco specific nitrosamines
Tobacco Heating Products
Tobacco harm reduction
Tobacco smoke toxicants
WHO, World Health Organisation
Journal
Toxicology reports
ISSN: 2214-7500
Titre abrégé: Toxicol Rep
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 101630272
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
21
12
2021
revised:
17
06
2022
accepted:
20
06
2022
entrez:
23
12
2022
pubmed:
24
12
2022
medline:
24
12
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Tobacco Heating Products (THPs) are tobacco products that heat rather than burn tobacco with temperatures less than 350 °C. Because of this operating principle, they produce substantially fewer and lower levels of tobacco smoke toxicants than combustible cigarette smoke produced when tobacco is burnt, which occurs at much higher temperatures of around 900 °C. This paper analyses data on a THP, glo™, and assesses whether its use would result in reduced health risks compared to the health risks of smoking cigarettes. It also looks at the possibility of bridging datasets across the different variants of the glo™ product. The approach is to consider whether datasets from behavioural, chemical, toxicological and clinical studies provide consistent findings of reductions in toxicant exposure with glo™ use by subjects who switch completely from smoking cigarettes to using glo™ and whether these reductions are similar to those who stop smoking cigarettes without switching to glo™ or any other tobacco or nicotine product. We also examine the similarities and differences of different versions of the glo™ product and benchmark it against a THP from another manufacturer. The studies indicate that the use of the glo™ results in substantial and prolonged reductions in toxicant exposure for smokers who switch to glo™ completely. A long-term clinical study shows substantial reductions in toxicant exposure over a period of time, similar to reduction of some biomarkers of exposure found following smoking cessation without switching to glo™ or any other tobacco product, and biomarkers of potential harm trending in a favourable manner for both groups that switch to glo™ and that quit all tobacco and nicotine use. Data suggests that all iterations of glo™ result in substantial reductions in toxicant exposure compared to smoking cigarettes and that bridging across datasets is feasible. Given the accumulated scientific data summarised in this paper, and particularly the findings from a long-term clinical study, the data demonstrate that glo™ is a reduced exposure product compared to combustible cigarettes and is reasonably deemed to reduce the risk of smoking-related diseases and supports the conclusion that smokers who would have otherwise continued to smoke and instead switch entirely to THP glo™ use, will reduce their relative risk of developing smoking-related diseases as compared to continued smoking. The extent of reduction in risk compared to continuing to smoke is likely to vary by smoking-related disease and by an individuals' smoking history, other risk factors and an individual's susceptibility to disease. Use of the THP will present some level of increased health risk as compared to cessation of tobacco and nicotine products and will cause dependence. As long as the principles of heat-not-burn are maintained, THP use will result in substantially reduced exposure to smoke toxicants as compared to continued conventional cigarette smoking. It is possible to use bridging or read across to apply these conclusions to new iterations of the glo™ product, extending the utility and validity of the evidence generated through study of prior iterations.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Tobacco Heating Products (THPs) are tobacco products that heat rather than burn tobacco with temperatures less than 350 °C. Because of this operating principle, they produce substantially fewer and lower levels of tobacco smoke toxicants than combustible cigarette smoke produced when tobacco is burnt, which occurs at much higher temperatures of around 900 °C. This paper analyses data on a THP, glo™, and assesses whether its use would result in reduced health risks compared to the health risks of smoking cigarettes. It also looks at the possibility of bridging datasets across the different variants of the glo™ product.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
The approach is to consider whether datasets from behavioural, chemical, toxicological and clinical studies provide consistent findings of reductions in toxicant exposure with glo™ use by subjects who switch completely from smoking cigarettes to using glo™ and whether these reductions are similar to those who stop smoking cigarettes without switching to glo™ or any other tobacco or nicotine product. We also examine the similarities and differences of different versions of the glo™ product and benchmark it against a THP from another manufacturer.
Results
UNASSIGNED
The studies indicate that the use of the glo™ results in substantial and prolonged reductions in toxicant exposure for smokers who switch to glo™ completely. A long-term clinical study shows substantial reductions in toxicant exposure over a period of time, similar to reduction of some biomarkers of exposure found following smoking cessation without switching to glo™ or any other tobacco product, and biomarkers of potential harm trending in a favourable manner for both groups that switch to glo™ and that quit all tobacco and nicotine use. Data suggests that all iterations of glo™ result in substantial reductions in toxicant exposure compared to smoking cigarettes and that bridging across datasets is feasible.
Conclusions
UNASSIGNED
Given the accumulated scientific data summarised in this paper, and particularly the findings from a long-term clinical study, the data demonstrate that glo™ is a reduced exposure product compared to combustible cigarettes and is reasonably deemed to reduce the risk of smoking-related diseases and supports the conclusion that smokers who would have otherwise continued to smoke and instead switch entirely to THP glo™ use, will reduce their relative risk of developing smoking-related diseases as compared to continued smoking. The extent of reduction in risk compared to continuing to smoke is likely to vary by smoking-related disease and by an individuals' smoking history, other risk factors and an individual's susceptibility to disease. Use of the THP will present some level of increased health risk as compared to cessation of tobacco and nicotine products and will cause dependence. As long as the principles of heat-not-burn are maintained, THP use will result in substantially reduced exposure to smoke toxicants as compared to continued conventional cigarette smoking. It is possible to use bridging or read across to apply these conclusions to new iterations of the glo™ product, extending the utility and validity of the evidence generated through study of prior iterations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36561950
doi: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2022.06.014
pii: S2214-7500(22)00150-0
pmc: PMC9764197
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
1426-1442Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: SG, NG, DT, SH, KP, IG, and FM were employees of a tobacco and nicotine product manufacturer, British American Tobacco (Investments) Limited at the time the studies were conducted. CP is a former employee of British American Tobacco (Investments) Limited and contributed as a paid consultant to British American Tobacco (Investments) Limited.
Références
BMJ. 2004 Jun 26;328(7455):1519
pubmed: 15213107
Chem Biol Interact. 2020 Jan 5;315:108887
pubmed: 31705857
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2018 Mar;93:14-33
pubmed: 29080848
Toxicol Lett. 2020 Nov 1;334:110-116
pubmed: 32707277
Toxicol Lett. 2022 Apr 1;358:59-68
pubmed: 35065211
Toxicol Rep. 2019 Oct 07;6:1155-1163
pubmed: 31737489
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2018 Mar;93:34-51
pubmed: 28989082
Nicotine Tob Res. 2021 Feb 16;23(3):584-591
pubmed: 32776101
Toxicol Sci. 2016 Mar;150(1):190-203
pubmed: 26719371
Sci Rep. 2020 Jan 8;10(1):12
pubmed: 31913299
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2018 Mar;93:62-70
pubmed: 29080849
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2019 Nov;28(11):1934-1943
pubmed: 31270101
Risk Anal. 2020 Jul;40(7):1355-1366
pubmed: 32356921
Toxicol Lett. 2019 Oct 15;315:14-22
pubmed: 31400404
Toxicol Lett. 2021 Sep 1;347:45-57
pubmed: 33892128
Intern Emerg Med. 2019 Sep;14(6):885-898
pubmed: 31049783
J Chromatogr A. 2018 Dec 21;1581-1582:105-115
pubmed: 30455053
Sci Rep. 2018 Feb 5;8(1):1145
pubmed: 29402904
Nanomaterials (Basel). 2020 Jan 06;10(1):
pubmed: 31935871
Tob Control. 2017 Aug 4;:
pubmed: 28778971
Intern Emerg Med. 2021 Nov;16(8):2201-2212
pubmed: 34196886
Toxicol Sci. 2007 Jan;95(1):5-12
pubmed: 16963515
Nicotine Tob Res. 2019 Aug 19;21(9):1220-1227
pubmed: 29912406
Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen. 2016 Nov 1;810:13-21
pubmed: 27776687
Front Toxicol. 2021 Dec 14;3:750254
pubmed: 35295103
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2018 Mar;93:71-83
pubmed: 29080850
Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 29;12(1):14701
pubmed: 36038580
J Chromatogr A. 2017 Oct 20;1520:135-142
pubmed: 28911941
Tob Control. 2003 Dec;12(4):424-30
pubmed: 14660781
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2018 Mar;93:84-91
pubmed: 28822877
Arch Toxicol. 2021 Jan;95(1):283-298
pubmed: 33025067
BMC Public Health. 2017 Aug 22;17(1):673
pubmed: 28830420
Tob Control. 2008 Apr;17(2):132-41
pubmed: 18375736
Food Chem Toxicol. 2018 Aug;118:940-952
pubmed: 29879435
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2018 Jul;96:127-134
pubmed: 29738810
Tob Control. 2001 Jun;10(2):189-95
pubmed: 11387543
BMJ. 1994 Oct 8;309(6959):901-11
pubmed: 7755693
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2018 Mar;93:92-104
pubmed: 29080852
BMJ. 2000 Aug 5;321(7257):323-9
pubmed: 10926586
Toxicol Rep. 2020 Aug 15;7:1010-1019
pubmed: 32874925
Toxicol Rep. 2021 May 08;8:994-1001
pubmed: 34026564
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2018 Mar;93:52-61
pubmed: 28987911
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2018 Mar;93:4-13
pubmed: 29080851
Nicotine Tob Res. 2022 Aug 6;24(9):1371-1378
pubmed: 35171296
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2017 Nov;90:342-357
pubmed: 28954704
Harm Reduct J. 2020 May 26;17(1):32
pubmed: 32450856