The relationship between subconstructs of empathy and general cognitive ability in the context of policing.

cognitive empathy general cognitive ability latent variable model policing subconstructs

Journal

Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 29 03 2022
accepted: 04 11 2022
entrez: 23 12 2022
pubmed: 24 12 2022
medline: 24 12 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Empathy has been widely theorized as an important ability in professions such as policing, in which to perform well individuals require multiple and interacting abilities, not least when resolving conflict situations. Even so, there are few studies investigating how subconstructs of empathy relate to other constructs such as general cognitive ability. The purpose of this paper is to establish, after evaluating psychometric properties, relationships among measures of empathy and cognitive ability in a sample of Swedish police students ( Multiple latent variable models of how the different measures work to predict tasks that can be seen as proxies for the ability to understand another person's situation and intentions are evaluated to determine the most robust relationship(s) within the data. We find support for the psychometric properties reported in previous studies with the used instruments. We also find support for perspective-taking, a cognitive empathy subconstruct predicting the ability to recognize emotions, and also the affective part of empathy, predicting general cognitive ability. These findings are discussed at length in the paper. This research adds more knowledge to the issue of how general cognitive ability relates to cognitive empathy and other subconstructs of empathy or Theory of Mind.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36562059
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.907610
pmc: PMC9765079
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

907610

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Inzunza, Brown, Stenlund and Wikström.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Psychon Bull Rev. 2010 Oct;17(5):673-9
pubmed: 21037165
Neuropsychologia. 2003;41(5):523-6
pubmed: 12559146
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 27;10(8):e0136521
pubmed: 26313946
Cogn Neuropsychiatry. 2013 Jul;18(4):326-54
pubmed: 23106125
Psychol Rev. 1990 Jul;97(3):404-31
pubmed: 2381998
Psychol Assess. 2019 Aug;31(8):1062-1072
pubmed: 31120296
Br J Psychol. 2012 Feb;103(1):58-72
pubmed: 22229774
J Adolesc. 2006 Aug;29(4):589-611
pubmed: 16198409
Ann Surg. 1995 Dec;222(6):735-42
pubmed: 8526580
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2001 Feb;42(2):241-51
pubmed: 11280420
Pers Individ Dif. 2015 Nov 1;86:6-14
pubmed: 26543298
Scand J Psychol. 2014 Oct;55(5):399-408
pubmed: 25040205
Mol Autism. 2013 Sep 11;4(1):33
pubmed: 24020728
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2006;30(6):855-63
pubmed: 16904182
Psych J. 2020 Feb;9(1):34-43
pubmed: 31394592
J Soc Psychol. 2022 Jan 2;162(1):143-160
pubmed: 35083952

Auteurs

Miguel Inzunza (M)

Police Education Unit, Faculty of Social Sciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.

Gavin T L Brown (GTL)

Faculty of Education and Social Work, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Department of Applied Educational Science, Faculty of Social Sciences, Umeå University, Umea, Sweden.

Tova Stenlund (T)

Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.

Christina Wikström (C)

Department of Applied Educational Science, Faculty of Social Sciences, Umeå University, Umea, Sweden.

Classifications MeSH