New probes based on carbon nano-cones for scanning probe microscopies.
Carbon cone
Focused ion beam processes
Graphene
Irradiation damages
Micromanipulator
Scanning probe microscopy
Journal
Ultramicroscopy
ISSN: 1879-2723
Titre abrégé: Ultramicroscopy
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 7513702
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2023
Mar 2023
Historique:
received:
15
07
2022
revised:
03
11
2022
accepted:
17
12
2022
pubmed:
24
12
2022
medline:
24
12
2022
entrez:
23
12
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
All-graphenic carbon morphologies grown on individual carbon nanotubes (CNTs) consisting of short-fiber segments bearing sharp micro-/nano-cones at both ends were mounted as new probes for scanning probe microscopies (SPM). Three mounting procedures were tested, two based on focused ion and/or electron beam processes operated in scanning electron microscopes, and another based on an irradiation-free procedure under an optical microscope. The benefits and drawbacks of all the methods are described in details. The extent to which the structural integrity of the carbon material of the cones was affected by each of the mounting processes was also investigated using Raman spectroscopy and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy. The carbon cones were found to be sensitive to both ion and electron irradiation to an unusual extent with respect to structurally-close nano-objects such as multi-wall CNTs. This was assumed to be due to the occurrence of a large number of free graphene-edges at the cone surface. The suitability of such carbon cones as SPM probes is demonstrated, the characteristics of which make them potentially superior to Si-, diamond-, or CNT-probes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36563496
pii: S0304-3991(22)00186-3
doi: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2022.113667
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
113667Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.