Effects of agritourism businesses' strategies to cope with the COVID-19 crisis: The key role of corporate social responsibility (CSR) behaviours.
Agritourism
COVID-19
CSR
Crisis
Proactive strategies
Resilience
Journal
Journal of cleaner production
ISSN: 0959-6526
Titre abrégé: J Clean Prod
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101538287
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 Nov 2021
20 Nov 2021
Historique:
received:
14
04
2021
revised:
23
08
2021
accepted:
04
10
2021
entrez:
26
12
2022
pubmed:
27
12
2022
medline:
27
12
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Evidence of the effects of tourism businesses' strategies to mitigate the negative impacts of the COVID-19 crisis remains remarkably scarce. Drawing on the system resilience framework, this study suggests a model in which corporate social responsibility (CSR) behaviours encompassing five dimensions - community, employees, environment, heritage and products - and co-creation experience mediate the relationships between strategies and performance. Applying partial least squares structural equation modeling to a sample of 199 agritourism businesses in Italy, this study finds that proactive strategies have a positive effect on performance and that this effect is fully mediated by CSR and co-creation experience. Reactive strategies have both a negative direct effect and a positive mediated effect on performance. Hence, the strategies positively affect performance only if they first contribute to the resilience of the local system through CSR behaviours, enhancing the resources needed for tourism experience co-creation. This analysis emphasises the impacts of the community, environmental and heritage dimensions of CSR behaviours.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36568913
doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129292
pii: S0959-6526(21)03477-6
pmc: PMC9759414
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
129292Informations de copyright
© 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Références
J Bus Res. 2020 Sep;117:312-321
pubmed: 32546875
Int J Hosp Manag. 2021 Jan;92:102707
pubmed: 33024348
Acad Manage Rev. 1978 Jul;3(3):546-62
pubmed: 10238389
Tour Manag. 2021 Oct;86:104316
pubmed: 34924666
Ann Tour Res. 2020 Jul;83:102990
pubmed: 32834220
Int J Hosp Manag. 2021 Jan;92:102752
pubmed: 33223596
J Clean Prod. 2021 Feb 10;283:124621
pubmed: 33071479
Am J Community Psychol. 2008 Mar;41(1-2):127-50
pubmed: 18157631
Int J Hosp Manag. 2020 Oct;91:102654
pubmed: 32863526
Ann Tour Res. 2005 Oct;32(4):942-961
pubmed: 32572284
Ann Tour Res. 2021 Jul;89:103076
pubmed: 33100431
Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2021 Feb;163:120469
pubmed: 35721368
J Clean Prod. 2021 May 15;297:126660
pubmed: 34785869
Tour Manag. 2022 Feb;88:104395
pubmed: 34720321
Tour Manag. 2020 Dec;81:104164
pubmed: 32518437