Analysis of Variations in Maxillary Second Molar Buccopalatal Inclination in Angle's Class I, Angle's Class III Malocclusion, and Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate (UCLP) Cases: A Comparative Observational Study.
force
inclination
malocclusion
occlusion
planning
postsurgical orthodontics
presurgical orthodontics
second molar
stable results
unilateral cleft lip and palate
Journal
Cureus
ISSN: 2168-8184
Titre abrégé: Cureus
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101596737
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2022
Nov 2022
Historique:
received:
19
06
2022
accepted:
18
11
2022
entrez:
26
12
2022
pubmed:
27
12
2022
medline:
27
12
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Introduction Cleft of the lip and/or the palate is commonly inherited defect which involves cleft of lip and palate. Maxillary second molar inclination has been studied in various malocclusion. Every abnormality in body is compensated to some extend by compensation. Our objectives were to evaluate maxillary second molar inclination in Angle's Class I, Class III malocclusion, and unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) patients in transverse plane and to compare variation in maxillary second molar inclination in Angle's Class I, Class III malocclusion, and UCLP cases buccopalatally in transverse plane. Material and method Model of 45 subjects were analyzed. The maxillary second molar inclination was measured using aid of protractor fixed on the surveyor. Axis under consideration was the axis along the long axis of the central fossa of maxillary second molar. Various standardization regarding measurement of second molar inclination were set. The maxillary second molar inclination was compared among 3 groups Angle's Class I, Class III malocclusion, and UCLP cases. Results Data was analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post-hoc Tukey test. There was a significant difference between inclination of maxillary second molar when Angle's Class I malocclusion was compared with Angle's Class III malocclusion and UCLP cases (p = 0.003 and p = 0.011, respectively). There was not a significant difference between Angle's Class III malocclusion and UCLP cases (p = 0.87). Conclusion Amongst Class III patients and UCLP patients the inclination of maxillary second molar had greater buccal inclination. Maxillary second molar correction would alleviate the effect of deleterious force on periodontium and bone generated by malpositioned teeth.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36569664
doi: 10.7759/cureus.31746
pmc: PMC9770556
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e31746Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022, Mathew et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Eur J Orthod. 2002 Dec;24(6):647-53
pubmed: 12512782
Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2020 Feb;32(1):135-151
pubmed: 31685347
Angle Orthod. 2021 Mar 1;91(2):243-247
pubmed: 33351889
Dental Press J Orthod. 2015 Jan-Feb;20(1):79-84
pubmed: 25741829
Indian J Plast Surg. 2010 Jul;43(2):184-9
pubmed: 21217978
Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2014 Nov;26(4):441-58
pubmed: 25220753
Prog Orthod. 2016 Dec;17(1):34
pubmed: 27696312
Int J Dent. 2020 Oct 31;2020:8893778
pubmed: 33204268
Semin Plast Surg. 2013 Aug;27(3):133-6
pubmed: 24872758
Br Dent J. 2004 Oct 9;197(7):385-91
pubmed: 15475894
Int J Oral Sci. 2015 Mar 23;7(1):14-7
pubmed: 25394591
Angle Orthod. 2020 Nov 1;90(6):851-856
pubmed: 33378513