Opening the black box of bird-window collisions: passive video recordings in a residential backyard.
Behavior
Bird feeding
Birds
Collisions
Conservation
Field study
Video recording
Windows
Journal
PeerJ
ISSN: 2167-8359
Titre abrégé: PeerJ
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101603425
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
28
06
2022
accepted:
29
11
2022
entrez:
26
12
2022
pubmed:
27
12
2022
medline:
28
12
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Collisions with windows on buildings are a major source of bird mortality. The current understanding of daytime collisions is limited by a lack of empirical data on how collisions occur in the real world because most data are collected by recording evidence of mortality rather than pre-collision behaviour. Based on published literature suggesting a causal relationship between bird collision risk and the appearance of reflections on glass, the fact that reflections vary in appearance depending on viewing angle, and general principles of object collision kinematics, we hypothesized that the risk and lethality of window collisions may be related to the angle and velocity of birds' flight. We deployed a home security camera system to passively record interactions between common North American bird species and residential windows in a backyard setting over spring, summer and fall seasons over 2 years. We captured 38 events including 29 collisions and nine near-misses in which birds approached the glass but avoided impact. Only two of the collisions resulted in immediate fatality, while 23 birds flew away immediately following impact. Birds approached the glass at variable flight speeds and from a wide range of angles, suggesting that the dynamic appearance of reflections on glass at different times of day may play a causal role in collision risk. Birds that approached the window at higher velocity were more likely to be immediately killed or stunned. Most collisions were not detected by the building occupants and, given that most birds flew away immediately, carcass surveys would only document a small fraction of window collisions. We discuss the implications of characterizing pre-collision behaviour for designing effective collision prevention methods.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36570015
doi: 10.7717/peerj.14604
pii: 14604
pmc: PMC9784330
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e14604Informations de copyright
© 2022 Samuels et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Références
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 9;13(8):e0201558
pubmed: 30092094
Front Neurosci. 2017 Nov 07;11:619
pubmed: 29163020
Curr Biol. 2011 Nov 8;21(21):1794-9
pubmed: 22036184
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e53371
pubmed: 23326420
Conserv Biol. 2021 Apr;35(2):654-665
pubmed: 32537779
PeerJ. 2016 Jun 23;4:e2170
pubmed: 27366656
PeerJ. 2022 Mar 22;10:e13142
pubmed: 35341053
Sci Rep. 2021 May 26;11(1):11062
pubmed: 34040016
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2014 Feb 15;24(1):12-8
pubmed: 24627710