Climate overrides fencing and soil mineral nutrients to affect plant diversity and biomass of alpine grasslands across North Tibet.

Northern Tibetan Plateau aboveground biomass grazing exclusion mineral elements plant species diversity soil micronutrient

Journal

Frontiers in plant science
ISSN: 1664-462X
Titre abrégé: Front Plant Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101568200

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 22 08 2022
accepted: 22 11 2022
entrez: 26 12 2022
pubmed: 27 12 2022
medline: 27 12 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Overgrazing and warming are thought to be responsible for the loss of species diversity, declined ecosystem productivity and soil nutrient availability of degraded grasslands on the Tibetan Plateau. Mineral elements in soils critically regulate plant individual's growth, performance, reproduction, and survival. However, it is still unclear whether plant species diversity and biomass production can be improved indirectly via the recovery of mineral element availability at topsoils of degraded grasslands, via grazing exclusion by fencing for years. To answer this question, we measured plant species richness, Shannow-Wiener index, aboveground biomass, and mineral element contents of Ca, Cu, Fe, Mg, Mn, Zn, K and P at the top-layer (0 - 10 cm) soils at 15 pairs of fenced vs grazed matched sites from alpine meadows (n = 5), alpine steppes (n = 6), and desert-steppes (n = 4) across North Tibet. Our results showed that fencing only reduced the Shannon-Wiener index of alpine meadows, and did not alter aboveground biomass, species richness, and soil mineral contents within each grassland type, compared to adjacent open sites grazed by domestic livestock. Aboveground biomass first decreased and then increased along with the gradient of increasing Ca content but did not show any clear relationship with other mineral elements across the three different alpine grassland types. More than 45% of the variance in plant diversity indices and aboveground biomass across North Tibet can be explained by the sum precipitation during plant growing months. Structural equation modelling also confirmed that climatic variables could regulate biomass production directly and indirectly via soil mineral element (Ca) and plant diversity indices. Overall, the community structure and biomass production of alpine grasslands across North Tibet was weakly affected by fencing, compared to the robst climatic control. Therefore, medium-term livestock exclusion by fencing might have limited contribution to the recovery of ecosystem structure and functions of degraded alpine grasslands.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36570963
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1024954
pmc: PMC9773210
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1024954

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Guo, Wesche, Mărgărint, Nowak, Dembicz and Wu.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Ecol Lett. 2021 Dec;24(12):2713-2725
pubmed: 34617374
Sci China Life Sci. 2010 Jul;53(7):841-50
pubmed: 20697873
Glob Chang Biol. 2015 Apr;21(4):1407-21
pubmed: 25363193
Sci Rep. 2018 Nov 22;8(1):17269
pubmed: 30467363
Glob Chang Biol. 2018 Nov;24(11):5534-5548
pubmed: 30086187
Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 9;7(1):15202
pubmed: 29123187
Nature. 2008 Jul 24;454(7203):393-6
pubmed: 18650887
Ecol Appl. 2018 Mar;28(2):442-456
pubmed: 29205627
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Jul 1;776:145838
pubmed: 33639469
Ecol Evol. 2019 May 14;9(11):6468-6479
pubmed: 31236236
Plant Cell. 2005 Aug;17(8):2142-55
pubmed: 16061961
J Environ Manage. 2010 Oct;91(10):1981-90
pubmed: 20627541
Glob Chang Biol. 2015 Oct;21(10):3647-56
pubmed: 25926356
J Environ Manage. 2019 Feb 1;231:635-645
pubmed: 30390448
Environ Sci Technol. 2012 Feb 21;46(4):1979-80
pubmed: 22304386
Ann Bot. 2012 Nov;110(6):1263-70
pubmed: 23002270
Nat Plants. 2015 Jul 06;1:15080
pubmed: 27250253
Ecol Evol. 2015 Sep 23;5(19):4492-504
pubmed: 26664694
Nature. 2006 Mar 9;440(7081):165-73
pubmed: 16525463
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Jul 28;112(30):9299-304
pubmed: 26170316
Sci Rep. 2016 Apr 13;6:24367
pubmed: 27073126
PeerJ. 2015 Jun 16;3:e1020
pubmed: 26157607

Auteurs

Chenrui Guo (C)

Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Hebei University of Science and Technology, Shijiazhuang, China.

Karsten Wesche (K)

Department of Botany, Senckenberg Museum of Natural History Görlitz, Görlitz, Germany.
International Institute (IHI) Zittau, Technische Universität Dresden, Zittau, Germany.
German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

Mihai Ciprian Mărgărint (MC)

Department of Geography, Geography and Geology Faculty, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iaşi, Iaşi, Romania.

Arkadiusz Nowak (A)

Botanical Garden Center for Biological Diversity Conservation in Powsin, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland.
Institute of Biology, University of Opole, Opole, Poland.

Iwona Dembicz (I)

Department of Ecology and Environmental Conservation, Institute of Environmental Biology, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.

Jianshuang Wu (J)

Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Department of Geography, Geography and Geology Faculty, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iaşi, Iaşi, Romania.

Classifications MeSH