Transmitted Drug Resistance to Integrase-Based First-Line Human Immunodeficiency Virus Antiretroviral Regimens in Mediterranean Europe.
Male
Humans
Adult
Female
Integrases
/ genetics
HIV Integrase Inhibitors
/ pharmacology
Anti-Retroviral Agents
/ therapeutic use
HIV Infections
/ drug therapy
Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
/ pharmacology
Mutation
Europe
/ epidemiology
HIV-1
/ genetics
Adenine
Drug Resistance, Viral
/ genetics
HIV Integrase
/ genetics
Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring
/ therapeutic use
HIV
resistance
transmission
Journal
Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America
ISSN: 1537-6591
Titre abrégé: Clin Infect Dis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9203213
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 05 2023
03 05 2023
Historique:
received:
30
09
2022
medline:
5
5
2023
pubmed:
27
12
2022
entrez:
26
12
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We evaluated the prevalence of transmitted drug resistance (TDR) to integrase strand-transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) and nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) and of clinically relevant resistance (CRR) in newly diagnosed people with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV; PWH) naive to antiretroviral therapy (ART) in Europe. MeditRes is a consortium that includes ART-naive PWH newly diagnosed in France, Greece, Italy, Portugal, and Spain during 2018-2021. Reverse transcriptase and INSTI sequences were provided by participating centers. To evaluate the prevalence of surveillance drug resistance mutations (SDRM), we used the calibrated population resistance tools from the Stanford HIV website. To evaluate CRR, defined as any resistance level ≥3, we used the Stanford HIV Drug Resistance Database v.9.1 algorithm. We included 2705 PWH, 72% men, median age of 37 years (interquartile range, 30-48); 43.7% were infected by non-B subtypes. The prevalence of INSTI-SDRMs was 0.30% (T66I, T66A, E92Q, E138T, E138K, Y143R, S147G, R263K; all n=1) and the prevalence of NRTI-SDRMs was 5.77% (M184V: 0.85%; M184I: 0.18%; K65R/N: 0.11%; K70E: 0.07%; L74V/I: 0.18%; any thymidine analog mutations: 4.36%). INSTI-CRR was 2.33% (0.15% dolutegravir/bictegravir, 2.29% raltegravir/elvitegravir) and 1.74% to first-line NRTIs (0.89% tenofovir/tenofovir alafenamide, 1.74% abacavir, 1.07% lamivudine/emtricitabine). We present the most recent data on TDR to integrase-based first-line regimens in Europe. Given the low prevalence of CRR to second-generation integrase inhibitors and to first-line NRTIs during 2018-2021, it is unlikely that newly diagnosed PWH in MeditRes countries would present with baseline resistance to a first-line regimen based on second-generation integrase inhibitors.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
We evaluated the prevalence of transmitted drug resistance (TDR) to integrase strand-transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) and nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) and of clinically relevant resistance (CRR) in newly diagnosed people with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV; PWH) naive to antiretroviral therapy (ART) in Europe.
METHODS
MeditRes is a consortium that includes ART-naive PWH newly diagnosed in France, Greece, Italy, Portugal, and Spain during 2018-2021. Reverse transcriptase and INSTI sequences were provided by participating centers. To evaluate the prevalence of surveillance drug resistance mutations (SDRM), we used the calibrated population resistance tools from the Stanford HIV website. To evaluate CRR, defined as any resistance level ≥3, we used the Stanford HIV Drug Resistance Database v.9.1 algorithm.
RESULTS
We included 2705 PWH, 72% men, median age of 37 years (interquartile range, 30-48); 43.7% were infected by non-B subtypes. The prevalence of INSTI-SDRMs was 0.30% (T66I, T66A, E92Q, E138T, E138K, Y143R, S147G, R263K; all n=1) and the prevalence of NRTI-SDRMs was 5.77% (M184V: 0.85%; M184I: 0.18%; K65R/N: 0.11%; K70E: 0.07%; L74V/I: 0.18%; any thymidine analog mutations: 4.36%). INSTI-CRR was 2.33% (0.15% dolutegravir/bictegravir, 2.29% raltegravir/elvitegravir) and 1.74% to first-line NRTIs (0.89% tenofovir/tenofovir alafenamide, 1.74% abacavir, 1.07% lamivudine/emtricitabine).
CONCLUSIONS
We present the most recent data on TDR to integrase-based first-line regimens in Europe. Given the low prevalence of CRR to second-generation integrase inhibitors and to first-line NRTIs during 2018-2021, it is unlikely that newly diagnosed PWH in MeditRes countries would present with baseline resistance to a first-line regimen based on second-generation integrase inhibitors.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36571282
pii: 6960884
doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac972
doi:
Substances chimiques
Integrases
EC 2.7.7.-
HIV Integrase Inhibitors
0
Anti-Retroviral Agents
0
Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
0
Adenine
JAC85A2161
HIV Integrase
EC 2.7.7.-
Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1628-1635Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Potential conflicts of interest. E. T. has received funds for attending meetings and/or travel from Moderna. C. C. has received grants or contracts from ViiV Healthcare, Gilead, and Merck Sharp & Dohme and support for attending meetings and/or travel from Gilead and Merck Sharp & Dohme. A. de M. has received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from ViiV Healthcare and Gilead and support for attending meetings and/or travel from ViiV Healthcare. K. S. has received funds for attending symposia, speaking, organizing educational activities, and travel grants from Gilead Sciences and ViiV Healthcare. A. A. has received support and travel support paid to author from Gilead and AbbVie and payment for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events paid to author from Roche Diagnostics, Vircell, and Gilead. R. D. has received consulting fees for advisory board membership paid to author from GSK, and Hologic and payment or honoraria for lectures from GSK, ViiV Healthcare, Gilead, and Merck Sharp & Dohme. S. L.-N. has received funds for attending symposia, speaking, organizing educational activities, and travel grants from Gilead Sciences, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and ViiV Healthcare. P. G. has received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from Gilead, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and ViiV Healthcare; support for attending meetings and/or travel from Merck Sharp & Dohme and ViiV Healthcare; and support for participation on a data and safety monitoring board (DSMB) or advisory board from ViiV Healthcare. D. P. has received funds for attending meetings and/or travel from Moderna. M. M. S. has received payment to author for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from ViiV Healthcare and for participation on a DSMB or advisory board from ViiV Healthcare, Janssen-Cilag, and Theratechnologies. F. C.-S. has received grants or contracts paid to institution and/or collaborating partner from Gilead Sciences, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and ViiV Healthcare; consulting fees to author from Gilead Sciences, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Theratechnologies, and ViiV Healthcare; and payment or honoraria to author for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing, or educational events from AbbVie, Gilead Sciences, Janssen-Cilag, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and ViiV Healthcare. A.-G. M. has received support for attending meetings and/or travel from Gilead Sciences and speaking and research grants from ViiV Healthcare, Gilead Sciences, and Merck Sharp & Dohme. F. G. has received grants or contracts from Gilead, AbbVie, Roche, and Seegene; consulting fees from Gilead, ViiV Healthcare, AbbVie, and Thera; payment or honoraria for speaking from Gilead, ViiV Healthcare, AbbVie, Thera, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and Roche; and support for attending symposia from Gilead, AbbVie, and Vircell. All other authors report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed. Data availability. Data are available to investigators upon reasonable request.