Mechanical tuning of virus-like particles.
Antigen conjugation
Atomic force microscopy
Mucosal vaccine
Nanomechanical properties
Single particle analysis
Virus-like particle
Journal
Journal of colloid and interface science
ISSN: 1095-7103
Titre abrégé: J Colloid Interface Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0043125
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 Mar 2023
15 Mar 2023
Historique:
received:
23
08
2022
revised:
18
12
2022
accepted:
18
12
2022
pubmed:
27
12
2022
medline:
18
1
2023
entrez:
26
12
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Virus-like particles (VLPs) are promising scaffolds for developing mucosal vaccines. For their optimal performance, in addition to design parameters from an immunological perspective, biophysical properties may need to be considered. We investigated the mechanical properties of VLPs scaffolded on the coat protein of Acinetobacter phage AP205 using atomic force microscopy and small angle X-ray scattering. Investigations showed that AP205 VLP is a tough nanoshell of stiffness 93 ± 23 pN/nm and elastic modulus 0.11 GPa. However, its mechanical properties are modulated by attaching muco-inert polyethylene glycol to 46 ± 10 pN/nm and 0.05 GPa. Addition of antigenic peptides derived from SARS-CoV2 spike protein by genetic fusion increased the stiffness to 146 ± 54 pN/nm although the elastic modulus remained unchanged. These results, which are interpreted in terms of shell thickness and coat protein net charge variations, demonstrate that surface conjugation can induce appreciable changes in the biophysical properties of VLP-scaffolded vaccines.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36571858
pii: S0021-9797(22)02238-X
doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2022.12.090
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Vaccines, Virus-Like Particle
0
RNA, Viral
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
963-971Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.