Automated estimation of ischemic core volume on noncontrast-enhanced CT via machine learning.

Acute ischemic stroke machine learning noncontrast CT

Journal

Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences
ISSN: 2385-2011
Titre abrégé: Interv Neuroradiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9602695

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
26 Dec 2022
Historique:
entrez: 27 12 2022
pubmed: 28 12 2022
medline: 28 12 2022
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Accurate estimation of ischemic core on baseline imaging has treatment implications in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Machine learning (ML) algorithms have shown promising results in estimating ischemic core using routine noncontrast computed tomography (NCCT). We used an ML-trained algorithm to quantify ischemic core volume on NCCT in a comparative analysis to pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in patients with AIS. Patients with AIS who had both pretreatment NCCT and MRI were enrolled. An automatic segmentation ML approach was applied using Brainomix software (Oxford, UK) to segment the ischemic voxels and calculate ischemic core volume on NCCT. Ischemic core volume was also calculated on baseline MRI DWI. Comparative analysis was performed using Bland-Altman plots and Pearson correlation. A total of 72 patients were included. The time-to-stroke onset time was 134.2/89.5 minutes (mean/median). The time difference between NCCT and MRI was 64.8/44.5 minutes (mean/median). In patients who presented within 1 hour from stroke onset, the ischemic core volumes were significantly (p  =  0.005) underestimated by ML-NCCT. In patients presented beyond 1 hour, the ML-NCCT estimated ischemic core volumes approximated those obtained by MRI-DWI and with significant correlation ( The ischemic core volumes calculated by the described ML approach on NCCT approximate those obtained by MRI in patients with AIS who present beyond 1 hour from stroke onset.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Accurate estimation of ischemic core on baseline imaging has treatment implications in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Machine learning (ML) algorithms have shown promising results in estimating ischemic core using routine noncontrast computed tomography (NCCT).
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
We used an ML-trained algorithm to quantify ischemic core volume on NCCT in a comparative analysis to pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in patients with AIS.
METHODS METHODS
Patients with AIS who had both pretreatment NCCT and MRI were enrolled. An automatic segmentation ML approach was applied using Brainomix software (Oxford, UK) to segment the ischemic voxels and calculate ischemic core volume on NCCT. Ischemic core volume was also calculated on baseline MRI DWI. Comparative analysis was performed using Bland-Altman plots and Pearson correlation.
RESULTS RESULTS
A total of 72 patients were included. The time-to-stroke onset time was 134.2/89.5 minutes (mean/median). The time difference between NCCT and MRI was 64.8/44.5 minutes (mean/median). In patients who presented within 1 hour from stroke onset, the ischemic core volumes were significantly (p  =  0.005) underestimated by ML-NCCT. In patients presented beyond 1 hour, the ML-NCCT estimated ischemic core volumes approximated those obtained by MRI-DWI and with significant correlation (
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
The ischemic core volumes calculated by the described ML approach on NCCT approximate those obtained by MRI in patients with AIS who present beyond 1 hour from stroke onset.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36572984
doi: 10.1177/15910199221145487
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

15910199221145487

Auteurs

Iris E Chen (IE)

Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Brian Tsui (B)

Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Haoyue Zhang (H)

Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Joe X Qiao (JX)

Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

William Hsu (W)

Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

May Nour (M)

Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Noriko Salamon (N)

Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Luke Ledbetter (L)

Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Jennifer Polson (J)

Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Corey Arnold (C)

Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Mersedeh BahrHossieni (M)

Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Reza Jahan (R)

Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Gary Duckwiler (G)

Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Jeffrey Saver (J)

Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

David Liebeskind (D)

Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Kambiz Nael (K)

Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Classifications MeSH