Barriers and Facilitators of Obtaining Social Determinants of Health of Patients With Cancer Through the Electronic Health Record Using Natural Language Processing Technology: Qualitative Feasibility Study With Stakeholder Interviews.
cancer
clinical
communication
data
education
electronic health records
natural language processing
patient
qualitative
social determinants of health
technology
Journal
JMIR formative research
ISSN: 2561-326X
Titre abrégé: JMIR Form Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101726394
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 Dec 2022
27 Dec 2022
Historique:
received:
28
09
2022
accepted:
05
12
2022
revised:
01
12
2022
entrez:
27
12
2022
pubmed:
28
12
2022
medline:
28
12
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Social determinants of health (SDoH), such as geographic neighborhoods, access to health care, education, and social structure, are important factors affecting people's health and health outcomes. The SDoH of patients are scarcely documented in a discrete format in electronic health records (EHRs) but are often available in free-text clinical narratives such as physician notes. Innovative methods like natural language processing (NLP) are being developed to identify and extract SDoH from EHRs, but it is imperative that the input of key stakeholders is included as NLP systems are designed. This study aims to understand the feasibility, challenges, and benefits of developing an NLP system to uncover SDoH from clinical narratives by conducting interviews with key stakeholders: (1) oncologists, (2) data analysts, (3) citizen scientists, and (4) patient navigators. Individuals who frequently work with SDoH data were invited to participate in semistructured interviews. All interviews were recorded and subsequently transcribed. After coding transcripts and developing a codebook, the constant comparative method was used to generate themes. A total of 16 participants were interviewed (5 data analysts, 4 patient navigators, 4 physicians, and 3 citizen scientists). Three main themes emerged, accompanied by subthemes. The first theme, importance and approaches to obtaining SDoH, describes how every participant (n=16, 100%) regarded SDoH as important. In particular, proximity to the hospital and income levels were frequently relied upon. Communication about SDoH typically occurs during the initial conversation with the oncologist, but more personal information is often acquired by patient navigators. The second theme, SDoH exists in numerous forms, exemplified how SDoH arises during informal communication and can be difficult to enter into the EHR. The final theme, incorporating SDoH into health services research, addresses how more informed SDoH can be collected. One strategy is to empower patients so they are aware about the importance of SDoH, as well as employing NLP techniques to make narrative data available in a discrete format, which can provide oncologists with actionable data summaries. Extracting SDoH from EHRs was considered valuable and necessary, but obstacles such as narrative data format can make the process difficult. NLP can be a potential solution, but as the technology is developed, it is important to consider how key stakeholders document SDoH, apply the NLP systems, and use the extracted SDoH in health outcome studies.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Social determinants of health (SDoH), such as geographic neighborhoods, access to health care, education, and social structure, are important factors affecting people's health and health outcomes. The SDoH of patients are scarcely documented in a discrete format in electronic health records (EHRs) but are often available in free-text clinical narratives such as physician notes. Innovative methods like natural language processing (NLP) are being developed to identify and extract SDoH from EHRs, but it is imperative that the input of key stakeholders is included as NLP systems are designed.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
This study aims to understand the feasibility, challenges, and benefits of developing an NLP system to uncover SDoH from clinical narratives by conducting interviews with key stakeholders: (1) oncologists, (2) data analysts, (3) citizen scientists, and (4) patient navigators.
METHODS
METHODS
Individuals who frequently work with SDoH data were invited to participate in semistructured interviews. All interviews were recorded and subsequently transcribed. After coding transcripts and developing a codebook, the constant comparative method was used to generate themes.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 16 participants were interviewed (5 data analysts, 4 patient navigators, 4 physicians, and 3 citizen scientists). Three main themes emerged, accompanied by subthemes. The first theme, importance and approaches to obtaining SDoH, describes how every participant (n=16, 100%) regarded SDoH as important. In particular, proximity to the hospital and income levels were frequently relied upon. Communication about SDoH typically occurs during the initial conversation with the oncologist, but more personal information is often acquired by patient navigators. The second theme, SDoH exists in numerous forms, exemplified how SDoH arises during informal communication and can be difficult to enter into the EHR. The final theme, incorporating SDoH into health services research, addresses how more informed SDoH can be collected. One strategy is to empower patients so they are aware about the importance of SDoH, as well as employing NLP techniques to make narrative data available in a discrete format, which can provide oncologists with actionable data summaries.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Extracting SDoH from EHRs was considered valuable and necessary, but obstacles such as narrative data format can make the process difficult. NLP can be a potential solution, but as the technology is developed, it is important to consider how key stakeholders document SDoH, apply the NLP systems, and use the extracted SDoH in health outcome studies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36574288
pii: v6i12e43059
doi: 10.2196/43059
pmc: PMC9832350
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e43059Informations de copyright
©Jordan Alpert, Hyehyun (Julia) Kim, Cara McDonnell, Yi Guo, Thomas J George, Jiang Bian, Yonghui Wu. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 27.12.2022.
Références
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Nov 25;28(12):2608-2616
pubmed: 34549294
JAMIA Open. 2021 Feb 09;4(3):ooaa069
pubmed: 34514351
Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Apr;102(4):810-814
pubmed: 30391299
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Dec 28;29(1):187-196
pubmed: 34664641
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Nov 25;28(12):2716-2727
pubmed: 34613399
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e205867
pubmed: 32515797
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Feb;48(2):215-218
pubmed: 25217095
Med Care. 2019 Jun;57 Suppl 6 Suppl 2:S197-S201
pubmed: 31095061
Cureus. 2022 Aug 14;14(8):e27993
pubmed: 36120243
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Nov 1;27(11):1764-1773
pubmed: 33202021
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2022 Feb 21;2021:1225-1233
pubmed: 35309014
J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Jan;21 Suppl 1:S3-8
pubmed: 16405707
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Sep;104(9):2224-2231
pubmed: 33775499
Front Public Health. 2022 Mar 28;10:778463
pubmed: 35419333
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019 Aug 21;264:1456-1457
pubmed: 31438179
JAMIA Open. 2022 Feb 16;5(1):ooac006
pubmed: 35224458
Popul Health Manag. 2021 Apr;24(2):222-230
pubmed: 32598228
SSM Popul Health. 2021 Jun 05;15:100836
pubmed: 34169138
JAMA Oncol. 2021 Jun 1;7(6):935-937
pubmed: 33830178
Am J Med. 2013 Oct;126(10):853-7
pubmed: 24054954
Prev Med. 2022 Aug;161:107150
pubmed: 35809824
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020 Jun;13(6):e006752
pubmed: 32412300
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Dec 24;99(52):e23818
pubmed: 33350768
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2018 Jun;10(6):807-815
pubmed: 30025784
Am J Med Sci. 2016 Apr;351(4):366-73
pubmed: 27079342