The role of rectal endoscopic ultrasonography plus fine needle aspirartion and fine needle biopsy in pelvic masses.
Journal
European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology
ISSN: 1473-5687
Titre abrégé: Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9000874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 02 2023
01 02 2023
Historique:
pubmed:
28
12
2022
medline:
30
12
2022
entrez:
27
12
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The diagnostic role of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) and fine needle biopsy (FNB) of pelvic masses has not been well established. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of EUS plus FNA/FNB in suspected local recurrence of pelvic masses. All consecutive patients with a history of lower gastrointestinal and pelvic mass undergone EUS-FNA/FNB were included in the study. In total 34 patients who underwent EUS-guided FNA or FNB of a perirectal mass were enrolled. The sampled lesion was a mass in 22 patients (64.7%) and a lymph node in 10 patients (29.4%). The univariate logistic regression analysis for diagnostic accuracy showed lesion size as a significant predictor of diagnostic accuracy [odds ratio (OR), 1.61; 1.08-2.27; P = 0.02]. Diagnostic sensitivity was 100% (71.5-100%) with EUS-FNB and 75% (34.9-96.8%) with EUS-FNA ( P = 0.12); specificity was 100% in both groups ( P = 1.0). Sample adequacy was 94.1% in the whole cohort, with 20/20 adequacy rate (100%) in the EUS-FNB group and 12/14 (85.7%) in the EUS-FNA group ( P = 0.28). This is the first study demonstrating the diagnostic yield of EUS plus FNA/FNB in patients with pelvic masses comparing the two needles. Our results highlight the relevance of this technique, especially in undefined masses during oncological follow-up.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND AIM
The diagnostic role of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) and fine needle biopsy (FNB) of pelvic masses has not been well established. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of EUS plus FNA/FNB in suspected local recurrence of pelvic masses.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
All consecutive patients with a history of lower gastrointestinal and pelvic mass undergone EUS-FNA/FNB were included in the study.
RESULTS
In total 34 patients who underwent EUS-guided FNA or FNB of a perirectal mass were enrolled. The sampled lesion was a mass in 22 patients (64.7%) and a lymph node in 10 patients (29.4%). The univariate logistic regression analysis for diagnostic accuracy showed lesion size as a significant predictor of diagnostic accuracy [odds ratio (OR), 1.61; 1.08-2.27; P = 0.02]. Diagnostic sensitivity was 100% (71.5-100%) with EUS-FNB and 75% (34.9-96.8%) with EUS-FNA ( P = 0.12); specificity was 100% in both groups ( P = 1.0). Sample adequacy was 94.1% in the whole cohort, with 20/20 adequacy rate (100%) in the EUS-FNB group and 12/14 (85.7%) in the EUS-FNA group ( P = 0.28).
CONCLUSION
This is the first study demonstrating the diagnostic yield of EUS plus FNA/FNB in patients with pelvic masses comparing the two needles. Our results highlight the relevance of this technique, especially in undefined masses during oncological follow-up.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36574305
doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000002468
pii: 00042737-202302000-00002
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
153-158Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Références
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin 2021; 71:7–33
Marin G, Suarez J, Vera R, Balén E, Viudez A, Mata E. Local recurrence after five years is associated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy treatment in patients diagnosed with stage II and III rectal cancer. Int J Surg 2017; 44:15–20.
Kapiteijin E, Marijnen CAM, Nagtegaal ID, Putter H, Steup WH, Wiggers T, et al. Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable recatl cancer. N Engl J Med 2001; 345:638–646.
Wong RK, Tandan V, De Silva S, Figueredo A. Pre-operative radiotherapy and curative surgery for the management of localized rectal carcinoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; 18:CD002102.
Lee SI, Oliva E, Hahn PF, Russell AH. Malignant tumors of the female pelvic floor: imaging features that determine therapy: pictorial review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 196:S15–23 Quis S24
Weinstein S, Osei-Bonsu S, Aslam R, Yee J. Multidetector CT of the postoperative colon: review of normal appearances and common complications. Radiographics 2013; 33:515–532.
Colosio A, Fornes P, Soyer P, Lewin M, Loock M, Hoeffel C. Local colorectal cancer recurrence: pelvic MRI evaluation. Abdom Imaging 2013; 38:72–81.
Even-Sapir E, Parag Y, Lerman H, Gutman M, Levine C, Rabau M, et al. Detection of recurrence in patients with rectal cancer: PET/CT after abdominoperineal or anterior resection. Radiology 2004; 232:815–822.
Rimbaş M, Crino SF, Gasbarrini A, Costamagna G, Scarpa A, Larghi A. EUS-guided fine-needle tissue acquisition for solid pancreatic lesions: finally moving from fine-needle aspiration to fine-needle biopsy? Endosc Ultrasound 2018; 7:137–140.
Wani S, Muthusamy VR, McGrath CM, Sepulveda AR, Das A, Messersmith W, et al. AGA White paper: optimizing endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition and future directions. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 16:318–327
Cotton PB, Eisen GM, Aabakken L, Baron TH, Hutter MM, Jacobson BC, et al. A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71:446–454.
Shinji S, Yamada T, Matsuda A, Sonoda H, Ohta R, Iwai T, et al. Recent advances in the treatment of colorectal cancer: a review. J Nippon Med Sch 2022; 89:246–254.
Belluco C, Forlin M, Olivieri M, Cannizzaro R, Canzonieri V, Buonadonna A, et al. Long-term outcome of rectal cancer with clinically (EUS/MRI) metastatic mesorectal lymph nodes treated by neoadjuvant chemoradiation: role of organ preservation strategies in relation to pathologic response. Ann Surg Oncol 2016; 23:4302–4309
Book: Chapter 6: ERUS and ERUS-FNA of Intramural and Extramural Masses of the Colorectum, pages 111-149. ERUS and ERUS-FNA of intramural and extramural masses of the colorectum. Bardales R (ed). Cytology of the mediastinum and gut via endoscopic ultrasound-guided aspiration. Springer. 2015.
Paiella S, Landoni L, Rota R, Valenti M, Elio G, Crinò SF, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for the diagnosis and grading of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a retrospective analysis of 110 cases. Endoscopy. 2020; 52:988–994.
Crinó SF, Brandolese A, Vieceli F, Paiella S, Conti Bellocchi MC, Manfrin E, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound features associated with malignancy and aggressiveness of nonhypovascular solid pancreatic lesions: results from a prospective observational study. Ultraschall Med. 2021; 42:167–177.
Crinò SF, Conti Bellocchi MC, Bernardoni L, Manfrin E, Parisi A, Amodio A, et al. Diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA of small (≤15 mm) solid pancreatic lesions using a 25-gauge needle. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2018; 17:70–74.
Facciorusso A, Barresi L, Cannizzaro R, Antonini F, Triantafyllou K, Tziatzios G, et al. Diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition in autoimmune pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open 2021; 9:E66–E75.
Facciorusso A, Crinò SF, Muscatiello N, Gkolfakis P, Samanta J, Londoño Castillo J, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle biopsy versus fine-needle aspiration for tissue sampling of abdominal lymph nodes: a propensity score matched multicenter comparative study. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:4298.
Crinò SF, Ammendola S, Meneghetti A, Bernardoni L, Conti Bellocchi MC, Gabbrielli A, et al. Comparison between EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology and EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy histology for the evaluation of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Pancreatology 2021; 21:443–450.
Facciorusso A, Sunny SP, Del Prete V, Antonino M, Muscatiello N. Comparison between fine-needle biopsy and fine-needle aspiration for EUS-guided sampling of subepithelial lesions: a meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 91:14–22.e2.
Facciorusso A, Del Prete V, Buccino VR, Purohit P, Setia P, Muscatiello N. Diagnostic yield of Franseen and Fork-Tip biopsy needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition: a meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open 2019; 7:E1221–E1230.
Facciorusso A, Paraskevas G, Crinò SF, Apostolis P, Ioannis SP, Konstantinos T, et al. Comparative diagnostic performance of end-cutting fine-needle biopsy needles for endoscopic ultrasound tissue sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a network meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 95:1067–1077.
Di Leo M, Crinò SF, Bernardoni L, Rahal D, Auriemma F, Correale L, et al. EUS-guided core biopsies of pancreatic solid masses using a new fork-tip needle: a multicenter prospective study. Dig Liver Dis 2019; 51:1275–1280.
Crinò SF, Bernardoni L, Manfrin E, Parisi A, Gabbrielli A. Endoscopic ultrasound features of pancreatic schwannoma. Endosc Ultrasound 2016; 5:396–398.
In memoriam: Fine-needle aspiration, birth: Fine-needle biopsy: the changing trend in endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition. Dig Endosc 2019; 31:197–202
Mangiavillano B, Sosa-Valencia L, Deprez P, Eisendrath P, Robles-Medranda C, Eusebi LH, et al. Tissue acquisition and pancreatic masses: which needle and which acquisition technique should be used? Endosc Int Open 2020; 8:E1315–E1320.
Tian L, Tang AL, Zhang L, Liu X-W, Li J-B, Wang F, et al. Evaluation of 22G fine-needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine-needle biopsy (FNB) for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of pancreatic lesions: a prospective comparison study. Surg Endosc 2018; 32:3533–3539.
Asokkumar R, Yung Ka C, Loh T, Kah Ling L, Gek San T, Ying H, et al. Comparison of tissue and molecular yield between fine-needle biopsy (FNB) and fine-needle aspiration (FNA): a randomized study. Endosc Int Open. 2019; 7:E955–E963.
Mangiavillano B, Frazzoni L, Togliani T, Fabbri C, Tarantino I, De Luca L, et al. Macroscopic on-site evaluation (MOSE) of specimens from solid lesions acquired during EUS-FNB: multicenter study and comparison between needle gauges. Endosc Int Open 2021; 9:E901–E906.
Boo SJ, Byeon JS, Park DH, Seo DW, Yang D-H, Jung KW, et al. EUS-guided fine needle aspiration and trucut needle biopsy for examination of rectal and perirectal lesions. Scand J Gastroenterol 2011; 46:1510–1518
Amin K, Olyaee M, Tawfik O, Fan F. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration as a diagnostic and staging tool for rectal and perirectal lesions-an institutional experience. Ann Diagn Pathol 2013; 17:494–497.
Maleki Z, Erozan Y, Geddes S, Li QK. Endorectal ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration: a useful diagnostic tool for perirectal and intraluminal lesions. Acta Cytol 2013; 57:9–18.