Intraoperative arthrography favorably impacts the early outcome of operatively managed fractures of the lateral humeral condyle displaced 1-5 mm in children.
Arthrogram
Lateral humeral condyle
Minimally displaced
Operative
Pediatric trauma
Percutaneous pinning
Radiography
Journal
Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research
ISSN: 1749-799X
Titre abrégé: J Orthop Surg Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101265112
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 Dec 2022
27 Dec 2022
Historique:
received:
25
09
2022
accepted:
22
12
2022
entrez:
27
12
2022
pubmed:
28
12
2022
medline:
30
12
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Controversy exists surrounding the optimal approach to managing pediatric lateral humeral condyle fractures (LHCF). The difficulty in assessing the articular surface using radiography and the intra-articular element potentially involved make LHCF susceptible to complications and delayed diagnoses. Arthrography has been used to delineate the articular surface to aid in deciding whether closed or open reduction is necessary. However, there has been scarce evidence to determine the accuracy of using radiography versus arthrography to predict articular disruption in LHCF displaced 1-5 mm. This study assesses; (1) the utility of intraoperative arthrography in modifying the method of operative reduction, (2) the accuracy of plain radiography in identifying articular integrity, and (3) the clinical outcomes of early operative treatment. This was a single-center prospective study that involved operatively treated pediatric LHCF with a displacement of 1-5 mm. Patient demographics, radiographic displacement, predicted radiographic articular integrity, articular integrity on arthrograms, modification of management and follow-up clinical outcomes were obtained. A total of 72 patients were included with a mean displacement of 2.6 mm and a mean follow-up of 16 months. The articular surface was disrupted in 21% of patients. The reduction method (open versus closed) was modified in 15 patients (21%) after an intraoperative arthrogram. Out of 25 patients with displacement < 2 mm, four of which (15%) had disrupted articular surface and were subsequently treated with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). While eleven patients with > 4 mm displacement had an intact articular hinge that were managed with closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP). All patients achieved union with no documented major complications. The ability of radiography to discriminate between disrupted/ intact articular integrity decreases as displacement decreases. Data from this study suggest using the degree of displacement measured on plain radiography is insufficient in predicting articular integrity for fractures displaced 1-5 mm. The use of arthrography guides reduction method and adequacy, avoiding scenarios of unnecessary open reduction and insufficient closed reduction. Further, a significant amount of outliers exist that have intact articular hinges above 4 mm and disrupted hinges below 2 mm of displacement. Finally we report favorable outcomes using a lower threshold for early operative treatment.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Controversy exists surrounding the optimal approach to managing pediatric lateral humeral condyle fractures (LHCF). The difficulty in assessing the articular surface using radiography and the intra-articular element potentially involved make LHCF susceptible to complications and delayed diagnoses. Arthrography has been used to delineate the articular surface to aid in deciding whether closed or open reduction is necessary. However, there has been scarce evidence to determine the accuracy of using radiography versus arthrography to predict articular disruption in LHCF displaced 1-5 mm. This study assesses; (1) the utility of intraoperative arthrography in modifying the method of operative reduction, (2) the accuracy of plain radiography in identifying articular integrity, and (3) the clinical outcomes of early operative treatment.
METHODS
METHODS
This was a single-center prospective study that involved operatively treated pediatric LHCF with a displacement of 1-5 mm. Patient demographics, radiographic displacement, predicted radiographic articular integrity, articular integrity on arthrograms, modification of management and follow-up clinical outcomes were obtained.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 72 patients were included with a mean displacement of 2.6 mm and a mean follow-up of 16 months. The articular surface was disrupted in 21% of patients. The reduction method (open versus closed) was modified in 15 patients (21%) after an intraoperative arthrogram. Out of 25 patients with displacement < 2 mm, four of which (15%) had disrupted articular surface and were subsequently treated with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). While eleven patients with > 4 mm displacement had an intact articular hinge that were managed with closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP). All patients achieved union with no documented major complications. The ability of radiography to discriminate between disrupted/ intact articular integrity decreases as displacement decreases.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Data from this study suggest using the degree of displacement measured on plain radiography is insufficient in predicting articular integrity for fractures displaced 1-5 mm. The use of arthrography guides reduction method and adequacy, avoiding scenarios of unnecessary open reduction and insufficient closed reduction. Further, a significant amount of outliers exist that have intact articular hinges above 4 mm and disrupted hinges below 2 mm of displacement. Finally we report favorable outcomes using a lower threshold for early operative treatment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36575490
doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03472-z
pii: 10.1186/s13018-022-03472-z
pmc: PMC9793543
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
569Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
J Pediatr Orthop. 2009 Sep;29(6):602-5
pubmed: 19700990
J Child Orthop. 2014 Feb;8(1):83-9
pubmed: 24488177
J Pediatr Orthop B. 2021 Mar 1;30(2):167-173
pubmed: 32694436
J Pediatr Orthop. 2016 Dec;36(8):780-786
pubmed: 26090985
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Dec;90(12):2673-81
pubmed: 19047713
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2017 Jan;33(1):21-25
pubmed: 28045839
J Pediatr Orthop. 2018 Sep;38(8):e429-e433
pubmed: 29917010
J Pediatr Orthop. 2004 Jul-Aug;24(4):385-91
pubmed: 15205620
J Pediatr Orthop. 1989 Nov-Dec;9(6):691-6
pubmed: 2600178
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Apr;48(2):1487
pubmed: 34028560
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018 Jun;138(6):809-817
pubmed: 29574555
J Pediatr Orthop. 2002 Jan-Feb;22(1):8-11
pubmed: 11744845
Orthopedics. 2020 Jan 1;43(1):30-35
pubmed: 31693741
J Pediatr Orthop. 2019 May/Jun;39(5):e349-e354
pubmed: 30531548
J Pediatr Orthop. 2020 Mar;40(3):e203-e209
pubmed: 31415016
Acta Orthop Scand. 1986 Aug;57(4):309-12
pubmed: 3788491
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Jan 9;16(1):32
pubmed: 33422107
J Pediatr Orthop. 2017 Mar;37(2):e83-e87
pubmed: 26840272
J Pediatr Orthop. 1995 Jul-Aug;15(4):422-5
pubmed: 7560027