Developments in the design and delivery of self-management support for children and young people with diabetes: A narrative synthesis of systematic reviews.
children and young people
glycaemic control
self-management behaviours
self-management support
type 1 diabetes
type 2 diabetes
Journal
Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association
ISSN: 1464-5491
Titre abrégé: Diabet Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8500858
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2023
04 2023
Historique:
revised:
22
11
2022
received:
27
07
2022
accepted:
23
12
2022
pubmed:
29
12
2022
medline:
15
3
2023
entrez:
28
12
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Facilitated self-management support programmes have become central to the treatment of chronic diseases including diabetes. For many children and young people with diabetes (CYPD), the impact on glycated haemoglobin (HbA Create a narrative review of systematic reviews produced in the last 3 years that have explored the impact on CYPD of the four key elements of self-management support programmes: education, instruction and advice including peer support; psychological counselling via a range of therapies; self-monitoring, including diaries and telemetric devices; and telecare, the technology-enabled follow-up and support by healthcare providers. Games and gamification appear to offer a promising means of engaging and educating CYPD. Psychological interventions when delivered by trained practitioners, appear to improve HbA The cost-effective flexibility of increasing the reliance on technology is an attractive proposition; however, there are resource implications for digital connectivity in underserved populations. The need remains to improve the understanding of which elements of each component are most effective in a particular context, and how to optimise the influence and input of families, caregivers and peers.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e15035Subventions
Organisme : National Institute for Health Research
Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors. Diabetic Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Diabetes UK.
Références
Jonkman NH, Schuurmans MJ, Groenwold RHH, Hoes AW, Trappenburg JCA. Identifying components of self-management interventions that improve health-related quality of life in chronically ill patients: systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Patient Educ Couns. 2016;99(7):1087-1098. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2016.01.022
Nolte S, Elsworth GR, Sinclair AJ, Osborne RH. The extent and breadth of benefits from participating in chronic disease self-management courses: a national patient-reported outcomes survey. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;65(3):351-360.
Schulman-Green D, Jaser S, Martin F, et al. Processes of self-management in chronic illness. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2012;44(2):136-144.
Lorig KR, Holman HR. Self-management education: history, definition, outcomes, and mechanisms. Ann Behav Med. 2003;26(1):1-7.
Riegel B, Westland H, Iovino P, et al. Characteristics of self-care interventions for patients with a chronic condition: a scoping review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2021;116:103713. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103713
van Puffelen AL, Rijken M, Heijmans MJWM, Nijpels G, Schellevis FG, Diacourse Study G. Effectiveness of a self-management support program for type 2 diabetes patients in the first years of illness: results from a randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2019;14(6):e0218242. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0218242
Phelan H, Lange K, Cengiz E, et al. ISPAD clinical practice consensus guidelines 2018: diabetes education in children and adolescents. Pediatr Diabetes. 2018;19:75-83.
Campbell F, Bolinder JAN. FreeStyle Libre™ use for self-Management of Diabetes in teenagers and young adults. Diabetes. 2018;67(Suppl._1):158-LB. doi:10.2337/db18-158-LB
Christie D, Thompson R, Sawtell M, et al. Structured, intensive education maximising engagement, motivation and long-term change for children and young people with diabetes: a cluster randomised controlled trial with integral process and economic evaluation - the CASCADE study. Health Technol Assess 2014;18(20):1-202. 10.3310/hta18200
Khanolkar AR, Amin R, Taylor-Robinson D, et al. Ethnic differences in early glycemic control in childhood-onset type 1 diabetes. BMJ Open Diabetes Rese Care. 2017;5(1):e000423.
Barrett T, Jalaludin MY, Turan S, Hafez M, Shehadeh N, Panel NNPTDGE. Rapid progression of type 2 diabetes and related complications in children and young people-a literature review. Pediatr Diabetes. 2020;21(2):158-172.
Carter P, Cutfield W, Hofman P, et al. Ethnicity and social deprivation independently influence metabolic control in children with type 1 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2008;51(10):1835-1842.
Graça Pereira M, Berg-Cross L, Almeida P, Cunha Machado J. Impact of family environment and support on adherence, metabolic control, and quality of life in adolescents with diabetes. Int J Behav Med. 2008;15(3):187-193. doi:10.1080/10705500802222436
Streisand R, Monaghan M. Young children with type 1 diabetes: challenges, research, and future directions. Curr Diab Rep. 2014;14(9):1-9.
Rodriguez KM. Intrinsic and extrinsic factors affecting patient engagement in diabetes self-management: perspectives of a certified diabetes educator. Clin Ther. 2013;35(2):170-178. doi:10.1016/j.clinthera.2013.01.002
Williams SJ, Caley L. Quality Improvement and Co-Production and Co-Design Models and Approaches. Improving Healthcare Services. Springer; 2020:55-67.
Higgins JP, Thomas J, Chandler J, et al. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. John Wiley & Sons; 2019.
Cooper H, Koenka AC. The overview of reviews: unique challenges and opportunities when research syntheses are the principal elements of new integrative scholarship. Am Psychol. 2012;67(6):446-462.
Smith V, Devane D, Begley CM, Clarke M. Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;11(1):15. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-11-15
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.
Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Inform Libraries J. 2009;26(2):91-108.
van Deursen AJAM, van Dijk JAGM. The first-level digital divide shifts from inequalities in physical access to inequalities in material access. New Media Soc. 2019;21(2):354-375. doi:10.1177/1461444818797082
McKenzie JE, Brennan SE. Synthesizing and presenting findings using other methods. In Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons; 2019:321-347.
Hermanns N, Ehrmann D, Finke-Groene K, Kulzer B. Trends in diabetes self-management education: where are we coming from and where are we going? A narrative review. Diabetic Med. 2020;37(3):436-447.
O'Hara M, Hynes L, O'Donnell M, et al. A systematic review of interventions to improve outcomes for young adults with type 1 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2017;34(6):753-769.
Charalampopoulos D, Hesketh KR, Amin R, Paes VM, Viner RM, Stephenson T. Psycho-educational interventions for children and young people with type 1 diabetes in the UK: how effective are they? A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017;12(6):e0179685.
Lazem S, Webster M, Holmes W, Wolf M. Games and diabetes: a review investigating theoretical frameworks, evaluation methodologies, and opportunities for design grounded in learning theories. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2016;10(2):447-452.
Ebrahimpour F, Najafi M, Sadeghi N. The design and development of a computer game on insulin injection. Electron Physician. 2014;6(2):845-855.
Marchetti D, Fraticelli F, Polcini F, et al. Preventing adolescents' diabesity: design, development, and first evaluation of “Gustavo in Gnam's planet”. Games Health J. 2015;4(5):344-351.
Sparapani VDC, Fels S, Nascimento LC. The value of children's voices for a video game development in the context of type 1 diabetes: focus group study. JMIR Diabet. 2017;2(2):e7652.
van Straten CL, Peter J, Kühne R. Child-robot relationship formation: a narrative review of empirical research. Int J Soc Robot. 2020;12(2):325-344.
Offringa R, Sheng T, Parks L, Clements M, Kerr D, Greenfield MS. Digital diabetes management application improves glycemic outcomes in people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2018;12(3):701-708.
Gatlin TK, Serafica R, Johnson M. Systematic review of peer education intervention programmes among individuals with type 2 diabetes. J Clin Nurs. 2017;26(23-24):4212-4222. doi:10.1111/jocn.13991
Litchman ML, Oser TK, Hodgson L, et al. In-person and technology-mediated peer support in diabetes care: a systematic review of reviews and gap analysis. Diabetes Educ. 2020;46(3):230-241.
Hong Y-R, Jo A, Cardel M, Huo J, Mainous AG III. Patient-provider communication with teach-back, patient-centered diabetes care, and diabetes care education. Patient Educ Couns. 2020;103(12):2443-2450.
Foster NC, Beck RW, Miller KM, et al. State of type 1 diabetes management and outcomes from the T1D exchange in 2016-2018. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2019;21(2):66-72.
Skinner T, Joensen L, Parkin T. Twenty-five years of diabetes distress research. Diabet Med. 2020;37(3):393-400.
Nicolucci A, Burns KK, Holt R, et al. Educational and psychological issues diabetes attitudes, wishes and needs second study (DAWN2TM): cross-national benchmarking of diabetes-related psychosocial outcomes for people with diabetes. Diabet Med. 2013;30:767-777.
Schmidt C, van Loon BP, Vergouwen A, Snoek F, Honig A. Systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological interventions in people with diabetes and elevated diabetes-distress. Diabet Med. 2018;35(9):1157-1172.
Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008;337:a1655.
Rey Velasco E, Pals RAS, Skinner TC, Grabowski D. Pre-empting the challenges faced in adolescence: a systematic literature review of effects of psychosocial interventions for preteens with type 1 diabetes. Endocrinol Diabet Metab. 2020;3(2):e00120. doi:10.1002/edm2.120
Jaser SS, Faulkner MS, Whittemore R, et al. Coping, self-management, and adaptation in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Ann Behav Med. 2012;43(3):311-319. doi:10.1007/s12160-012-9343-z
Sturt J, Dennick K, Hessler D, Hunter BM, Oliver J, Fisher L. Effective interventions for reducing diabetes distress: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Diabet Nurs. 2015;12(2):40-55. doi:10.1179/2057332415Y.0000000004
Law E, Fisher E, Eccleston C, Palermo TM. Psychological interventions for parents of children and adolescents with chronic illness. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;2021:3.
Feldman MA, Anderson LM, Shapiro JB, et al. Family-based interventions targeting improvements in health and family outcomes of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a systematic review. Curr Diab Rep. 2018;18(3):1-12.
Hou C, Carter B, Hewitt J, Francisa T, Mayor S. Do mobile phone applications improve glycemic control (HbA1c) in the self-management of diabetes? A systematic review, meta-analysis, and GRADE of 14 randomized trials. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(11):2089-2095.
Hilliard ME, Levy W, Anderson BJ, et al. Benefits and barriers of continuous glucose monitoring in young children with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2019;21(9):493-498. doi:10.1089/dia.2019.0142
Houts PS, Doak CC, Doak LG, Loscalzo MJ. The role of pictures in improving health communication: a review of research on attention, comprehension, recall, and adherence. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;61(2):173-190. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2005.05.004
Umpierrez GE, Kovatchev BP. Glycemic variability: how to measure and its clinical implication for type 2 diabetes. Am J Med Sci. 2018;356(6):518-527. doi:10.1016/j.amjms.2018.09.010
Rodriguez-León C, Villalonga C, Munoz-Torres M, Ruiz JR, Banos O. Mobile and wearable technology for the monitoring of diabetes-related parameters: systematic review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021;9(6):e25138. doi:10.2196/25138
So CF, Chung JWY. Telehealth for diabetes self-management in primary healthcare: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Telemed Telecare. 2018;24(5):356-364. doi:10.1177/1357633X17700552
Guljas R, Ahmed A, Chang K, Whitlock A. Impact of telemedicine in managing type 1 diabetes among school-age children and adolescents: an integrative review. J Pediatr Nurs. 2014;29(3):198-204. doi:10.1016/j.pedn.2013.10.013
Lunde P, Nilsson BB, Bergland A, Kvaerner KJ, Bye A. The effectiveness of smartphone apps for lifestyle improvement in noncommunicable diseases: systematic review and meta-analyses. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(5):e162. doi:10.2196/jmir.9751
Pérez YIV, Medlow S, Ho J, Steinbeck K. Mobile and web-based apps that support self-management and transition in young people with chronic illness: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(11):e13579.
Huang Z, Soljak M, Boehm BO, Car J. Clinical relevance of smartphone apps for diabetes management: a global overview. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2018;34(4):e2990.