The feasibility of robot-assisted radical cystectomy: an experimental study.
Avatera system
Experimental study
Orthotopic ileal neobladder
Robot-assisted radical cystectomy
Journal
World journal of urology
ISSN: 1433-8726
Titre abrégé: World J Urol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8307716
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2023
Feb 2023
Historique:
received:
06
09
2022
accepted:
04
12
2022
pubmed:
29
12
2022
medline:
25
2
2023
entrez:
28
12
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To investigate the feasibility of the avatera system for performing robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) followed by intracorporeal reconstruction of ileal neobladder. Six anesthetized female pigs were used to perform RARC and formation of the intracorporeal orthotopic ileal neobladder. Three surgeons with different level of expertise in the use of robotic systems performed RARC after a short instructional lecture and a 2-h hands-on training. The urinary diversion phase was performed only by the experienced surgeon. The successful completion of the procedure, operative time for demolitive and reconstructive phases, intraoperative blood loss and malfunction of the robotic system were evaluated. An improvement of the operative time was observed for each surgeon. The experienced surgeon, the fellow and the resident improved their time by 11, 15, and 22 min, respectively, between the first and the second RARC performed. The most significant time difference was demonstrated by the resident, who had no previous experience in using robotic systems. The time difference between the first and the last orthotopic ileal neobladder creation for the experienced surgeon was 51 min. The feasibility of avatera system for performing complex surgical procedure such as RARC with intracorporeal neobladder formation was demonstrated by this experimental study. No major bleeding or severe malfunctions were observed during the procedures. Significant improvement in operative time was demonstrated with the increasing experience from 1st to 6th case.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36577927
doi: 10.1007/s00345-022-04266-y
pii: 10.1007/s00345-022-04266-y
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
477-482Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Kaufman DS, Shipley WU, Feldman AS (2009) Bladder cancer. Lancet (Lond Engl) 374(9685):239–49 (PubMed PMID: 19520422. Epub 2009/06/13. eng.)
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60491-8
Aminoltejari K, Black PC. Radical cystectomy: a review of techniques, developments and controversies. Translational andrology and urology. 2020 Dec;9(6):3073–81. PubMed PMID: 33457280. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC7807330. Epub 2021/01/19. eng.
Parra RO, Andrus CH, Jones JP, Boullier JA (1992) Laparoscopic cystectomy: initial report on a new treatment for the retained bladder. J Urol 148(4):1140–4 (PubMed PMID: 1404624. Epub 1992/10/01. eng)
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)36843-X
pubmed: 1404624
Chitwood WR Jr, Nifong LW, Elbeery JE et al (2000) Robotic mitral valve repair: trapezoidal resection and prosthetic annuloplasty with the da vinci surgical system. J Thora Cardiovasc Surg 120(6):1171–2 (PubMed PMID: 11088044. Epub 2000/11/23. eng)
doi: 10.1067/mtc.2000.110177
Tyritzis SI, Collins JW, Wiklund NP (2018) The current status of robot-assisted cystectomy. Indian J Urol IJU 34(2):101–9 (PubMed PMID: 29692502. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC5894281. Epub 2018/04/26. eng)
doi: 10.4103/iju.IJU_355_17
pubmed: 29692502
Van Koughnett JA, Jayaraman S, Eagleson R, Quan D, van Wynsberghe A, Schlachta CM (2009) Are there advantages to robotic-assisted surgery over laparoscopy from the surgeon’s perspective? J Robot Surg 3(2):79–82 (PubMed PMID: 27638219. Epub 2009/06/01. eng)
doi: 10.1007/s11701-009-0144-8
pubmed: 27638219
Bai Y, Wang S, Zheng W et al (2021) Clinical outcome of laparoscopic versus robot-assisted radical cystectomy for patients with bladder cancer: a retrospective study. BMC Surg. 21(1):388
doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01382-1
pubmed: 34727908
pmcid: 8561927
Minervini A, Vanacore D, Vittori G et al (2018) Florence robotic intracorporeal neobladder (FloRIN): a new reconfiguration strategy developed following the IDEAL guidelines. BJU Int 121(2):313–7 (PubMed PMID: 29140596. Epub 2017/11/16. eng)
doi: 10.1111/bju.14077
pubmed: 29140596
Avateramedical. Avaterasystem 2022 [cited 2022]. Available from: https://www.avatera.eu/en/avatera-system .
Martin AS, Corcoran AT (2021) Contemporary techniques and outcomes of robotic assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion. Transl Androl Urol 10(5):2216–32 (PubMed PMID: 34159105. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC8185677. Epub 2021/06/24. eng)
doi: 10.21037/tau.2019.09.45
pubmed: 34159105
pmcid: 8185677
Rassweiler JJ, Autorino R, Klein J et al (2017) Future of robotic surgery in urology. BJU Int 120(6):822–41 (PubMed PMID: 28319324. Epub 2017/03/21. eng)
doi: 10.1111/bju.13851
pubmed: 28319324
Leijte E, de Blaauw I, Van Workum F, Rosman C, Botden S (2020) Robot assisted versus laparoscopic suturing learning curve in a simulated setting. Surg Endosc 34(8):3679–89 (PubMed PMID: 31754849. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC7326898. Epub 2019/11/23. eng.)
doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07263-2
pubmed: 31754849
Alip SL, Kim J, Rha KH, Han WK (2022) Future platforms of robotic surgery. Urol Clin N Am 49(1):23–38 (PubMed PMID: 34776052. Epub 2021/11/16. eng.)
doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2021.07.008
Liatsikos E, Tsaturyan A, Kyriazis I, Kallidonis P, Manolopoulos D, Magoutas A (2022) Market potentials of robotic systems in medical science: analysis of the Avatera robotic system. World J Urol. 40(1):283–9 (PubMed PMID: 34424374. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC8381715. Epub 2021/08/24. eng)
doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03809-z
pubmed: 34424374
Spampinato G, Binet A, Fourcade L et al (2021) Comparison of the learning curve for robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty between senior and junior surgeons. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech Part A. 31(4):478–83 (PubMed PMID: 33651635. Epub 2021/03/03. eng)
doi: 10.1089/lap.2020.0822
Tuo Z, Zhang Y, Wang J et al (2021) Three-port approach vs standard laparoscopic radical cystectomy with an ileal conduit: a single-centre retrospective study. BMC Urol. 21(1):159
doi: 10.1186/s12894-021-00920-6
pubmed: 34781963
pmcid: 8591944
Dai X, Fan S, Hao H et al (2021) Comparison of KD-SR-01 robotic partial nephrectomy and 3D-laparoscopic partial nephrectomy from an operative and ergonomic perspective: A prospective randomized controlled study in porcine models. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg MRCAS. 17(2):e2187 (PubMed PMID: 33068498. Epub 2020/10/18. eng.)
Berguer R, Smith W (2006) An ergonomic comparison of robotic and laparoscopic technique: the influence of surgeon experience and task complexity. J Surg Res 134(1):87–92 (PubMed PMID: 16376941. Epub 2005/12/27. eng)
doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2005.10.003
pubmed: 16376941
Menon M, Hemal AK, Tewari A et al (2003) Nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical cystoprostatectomy and urinary diversion. BJU Int 92(3):232–6 (PubMed PMID: 12887473. Epub 2003/07/31. eng)
doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410X.2003.04329.x
pubmed: 12887473
Fujimura T (2019) Current status and future perspective of robot-assisted radical cystectomy for invasive bladder cancer 26(11):1033-42
Khetrapal P, Conroy S, Kelly JD, Catto JWF (2020) Comparing open-radical cystectomy and robot-assisted radical cystectomy: current status and analysis of the evidence. Curr Opin Urol 30(3):400–6 (PubMed PMID: 32235281. Epub 2020/04/03. eng)
doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000000755
pubmed: 32235281
Parekh DJ, Reis IM, Castle EP et al (2018) Robot-assisted radical cystectomy versus open radical cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer (RAZOR): an open-label, randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet (Lond Engl) 391(10139):2525–36 (PubMed PMID: 29976469. Epub 2018/07/07. eng.)
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30996-6
Mastroianni R, Ferriero M, Tuderti G et al (2022) Open radical cystectomy versus robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion: early outcomes of a single-center randomized controlled trial. J Urol 207(5):982–92 (PubMed PMID: 34986007. Epub 2022/01/06. eng.)
doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002422
pubmed: 34986007
Mastroianni R, Tuderti G, Anceschi U et al (2022) Comparison of patient-reported health-related quality of life between open radical cystectomy and robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion: interim analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Eur Urol Focus 8(2):465–71 (PubMed PMID: 33712389. Epub 2021/03/14. eng.)
doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.03.002
pubmed: 33712389
Fonseka T, Ahmed K, Froghi S, Khan SA, Dasgupta P, Shamim Khan M (2015) Comparing robotic, laparoscopic and open cystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Archivio italiano di urologia, andrologia : organo ufficiale [di] Societa italiana di ecografia urologica e nefrologica 87(1):41–8. (PubMed PMID: 25847896. Epub 2015/04/08. Eng)
Brassetti A, Mastroianni R, Simone G (2019) Are we really seeking for equivalence? The virtue of the robot is in technology. Transl Androl Urol 8(Suppl 5):S502-s4 (PubMed PMID: 32042631. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC6989866. Epub 2020/02/12. eng)
doi: 10.21037/tau.2019.08.19
pubmed: 32042631
pmcid: 6989866
Lombardo R, Mastroianni R, Tuderti G, et al (2021) Benchmarking PASADENA consensus along the learning curve of robotic radical cystectomy with intracorporeal neobladder: CUSUM based assessment. J Clin Med 10(24). (PubMed PMID: 34945265. Pubmed Central PMCID: PMC8706610. Epub 2021/12/25. eng.)