An algorithmic approach to balloon undilatable coronary lesions.
ATHR - atherectomy
BALC - balloon
LASR - laser
PCIC - percutaneous coronary intervention
complex PCI
cutting
Journal
Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions
ISSN: 1522-726X
Titre abrégé: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100884139
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 Dec 2022
28 Dec 2022
Historique:
revised:
05
12
2022
received:
31
10
2022
accepted:
16
12
2022
entrez:
29
12
2022
pubmed:
30
12
2022
medline:
30
12
2022
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Balloon undilatable lesions are lesions that have been successfully crossed by both a guidewire and a balloon but cannot be expanded despite multiple high-pressure balloon inflations. Balloon undilatable lesions can be de novo or in-stent. We describe a systematic, algorithmic approach to treat both de novo and in-stent balloon undilatable lesions using various techniques, such as high-pressure balloon inflation, plaque modification balloons, intravascular lithotripsy, very high-pressure balloon inflation, coronary atherectomy, laser coronary angioplasty, and extraplaque lesion crossing. Knowledge of the various techniques can increase the efficiency, success and safety of the procedure.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2022 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Références
Tajti P, Karmpaliotis D, Alaswad K, et al. Prevalence, presentation and treatment of ‘balloon undilatable’ chronic total occlusions: insights from a multicenter US registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;91:657-666.
McQuillan C, Jackson MWP, Brilakis ES, Egred M. Uncrossable and undilatable lesions-A practical approach to optimizing outcomes in PCI. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;97:121-126.
Simsek B, Kostantinis S, Karacsonyi J, et al. Prevalence and outcomes of balloon undilatable chronic total occlusions: insights from the PROGRESS-CTO. Int J Cardiol. 2022;362:42-46.
Karacsonyi J, Armstrong EJ, Truong HTD, et al. Contemporary use of laser during percutaneous coronary interventions: insights from the laser veterans affairs (LAVA) multicenter registry. J Invasive Cardiol. 2018;30:195-201.
Zhang M, Matsumura M, Usui E, et al. Intravascular ultrasound-derived calcium score to predict stent expansion in severely calcified lesions. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;14:e010296.
Fujino A, Mintz GS, Matsumura M, et al. A new optical coherence tomography-based calcium scoring system to predict stent underexpansion. EuroIntervention. 2018;13:2182-2189.
de Ribamar Costa J, Mintz GS, Carlier SG, et al. Nonrandomized comparison of coronary stenting under intravascular ultrasound guidance of direct stenting without predilation versus conventional predilation with a semi-compliant balloon versus predilation with a new scoring balloon. Am J Cardiol. 2007;100:812-817.
Matsukawa R, Kozai T, Tokutome M, et al. Plaque modification using a cutting balloon is more effective for stenting of heavily calcified lesion than other scoring balloons. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2019;34:325-334.
Mauri L, Bonan R, Weiner BH, et al. Cutting balloon angioplasty for the prevention of restenosis: results of the cutting balloon global randomized trial. Am J Cardiol. 2002;90:1079-1083.
Karacsonyi J, Nikolakopoulos I, Vemmou E, Rangan BV, Brilakis ES. Intracoronary lithotripsy. JACC: Case Reports. 2021;3:780-785.
Brinton TJ, Ali ZA, Hill JM, et al. Feasibility of shockwave coronary intravascular lithotripsy for the treatment of calcified coronary stenoses. Circulation. 2019;139:834-836.
Ali ZA, Nef H, Escaned J, et al. Safety and effectiveness of coronary intravascular lithotripsy for treatment of severely calcified coronary stenoses: the disrupt CAD II study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12:e008434.
Hill JM, Kereiakes DJ, Shlofmitz RA, et al. Intravascular lithotripsy for treatment of severely calcified coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76:2635-2646.
Saito S, Yamazaki S, Takahashi A, et al. Intravascular lithotripsy for vessel preparation in calcified coronary arteries prior to stent placement - Japanese disrupt CAD IV study 1-year results. Circulation reports. 2022;4:399-404.
Ielasi A, Moscarella E, Testa L, et al. IntravaScular lithotripsy for the management of UndILatable coronary StEnt: the SMILE registry. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2020;21:1555-1559.
Blachutzik F, Honton B, Escaned J, et al. Safety and effectiveness of coronary intravascular lithotripsy in eccentric calcified coronary lesions: a patient-level pooled analysis from the disrupt CAD I and CAD II studies. Clin Res Cardiol. 2021;110:228-236.
Secco GG, Ghione M, Mattesini A, et al. Very high-pressure dilatation for undilatable coronary lesions: indications and results with a new dedicated balloon. EuroIntervention. 2016;12:359-365.
Secco GG, Buettner A, Parisi R, et al. Clinical experience with very high-pressure dilatation for resistant coronary lesions. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2019;20:1083-1087.
Dobrzycki S, Reczuch K, Legutko J, et al. Rotational atherectomy in everyday clinical practice. Association of cardiovascular interventions of the Polish Society of Cardiology (Asocjacja Interwencji Sercowo-Naczyniowych Polskiego Towarzystwa Kardiologicznego - AISN PTK): expert opinion. Kardiol Pol. 2018;76:1576-1584.
Sharma SK, Tomey MI, Teirstein PS, et al. North American expert review of rotational atherectomy. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12:e007448.
Lawton JS, Tamis-Holland JE, Bangalore S, et al. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI guideline for coronary artery revascularization: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2022;145:e4-e17.
Bouisset F, Barbato E, Reczuch K, et al. Clinical outcomes of PCI with rotational atherectomy: the European multicentre Euro4C registry. EuroIntervention. 2020;16:e305-e312.
Abdel-Wahab M, Toelg R, Byrne RA, et al. High-speed rotational atherectomy versus modified balloons prior to drug-eluting stent implantation in severely calcified coronary lesions. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11:e007415.
Kinnaird T, Gallagher S, Sharp A, et al. Operator volumes and in-hospital outcomes. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2021;14:1423-1430.
Parikh K, Chandra P, Choksi N, Khanna P, Chambers J. Safety and feasibility of orbital atherectomy for the treatment of calcified coronary lesions: the ORBIT I trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;81:1134-1139.
Lee M, Généreux P, Shlofmitz R, et al. Orbital atherectomy for treating de novo, severely calcified coronary lesions: 3-year results of the pivotal ORBIT II trial. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2017;18:261-264.
Lee MS, Shlofmitz E, Goldberg A, Shlofmitz R. Multicenter registry of real-world patients with severely calcified coronary lesions undergoing orbital atherectomy: 1-year outcomes. J Invasive Cardiol. 2018;30:121-124.
Khan AA, Murtaza G, Khalid MF, et al. Outcomes of rotational atherectomy versus orbital atherectomy for the treatment of heavily calcified coronary stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;98:884-892.
Darmoch F, Ullah W, Al-Khadra Y, et al. Characteristics and hospital outcomes of coronary atherectomy within the United States: a multivariate and propensity-score matched analysis. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2021;19:865-870.
Sharma SK, Kini A, Mehran R, Lansky A, Kobayashi Y, Marmur JD. Randomized trial of rotational atherectomy versus balloon angioplasty for diffuse in-stent restenosis (ROSTER). Am Heart J. 2004;147:16-22.
Ferri LA, Jabbour RJ, Giannini F, et al. Safety and efficacy of rotational atherectomy for the treatment of undilatable underexpanded stents implanted in calcific lesions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;90:E19-E24.
Neupane S, Basir M, Tan C, et al. Feasibility and safety of orbital atherectomy for the treatment of in-stent restenosis secondary to stent under-expansion. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;97:2-7.
Karacsonyi J, Alaswad K, Choi JW, et al. Laser for balloon uncrossable and undilatable chronic total occlusion interventions. Int J Cardiol. 2021;336:33-37.
Sintek M, Coverstone E, Bach R, et al. Excimer laser coronary angioplasty in coronary lesions: use and safety from the NCDR/CATH PCI registry. Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2021;14:e010061.
Yeoh J, Hill J, Spratt JC. Intravascular lithotripsy assisted chronic total occlusion revascularization with reverse controlled antegrade retrograde tracking. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;93:1295-1297.