Which modality is better to diagnose high-grade transformation in retroperitoneal liposarcoma? Comparison of computed tomography, positron emission tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging.


Journal

International journal of clinical oncology
ISSN: 1437-7772
Titre abrégé: Int J Clin Oncol
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 9616295

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Mar 2023
Historique:
received: 05 09 2022
accepted: 20 12 2022
pubmed: 31 12 2022
medline: 9 3 2023
entrez: 30 12 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Survival in patients with retroperitoneal liposarcoma (RPLS) depends on the surgical management of the dedifferentiated foci. The present study investigated the diagnostic yield of contrast-enhanced CT, Patients treated with primary or recurrent RPLS who underwent the above imaging between January 2010 and December 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. The diagnostic accuracy of the three modalities for histologic subtype of dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLS) and French Federation of Cancer Center (FNCLCC) grade 2/3 were compared using receiver operating characteristic curves and areas under the curves (AUCs). The cohort involved 32 patients with 53 tumors; 30 of which exhibited DDLS and 31 of which did FNCLCC grades 2/3. The optimal thresholds for predicting DDLS were mean CT value of 31 Hounsfield Unit (HU) (AUC = 0.880, 95% CI 0.775-0.984; p < 0.001), maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of 2.9 (AUC = 0.865 95% CI 0.792-0.980; p < 0.001), while MRI failed to differentiate DDLS. The cutoff values for distinguishing FNCLCC grades 1 and 2/3 were a mean CT value of 24 HU (AUC = 0.858, 95% CI 0.731-0.985; p < 0.001) and SUVmax of 2.9 (AUC = 0.885, 95% CI 0.792-0.978; p < 0.001). MRI had no sufficient power to separate these grades. Contrast-enhanced CT and PET were useful for predicting DDLS and FNCLCC grade 2/3, while MRI was inferior to these two modalities.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Survival in patients with retroperitoneal liposarcoma (RPLS) depends on the surgical management of the dedifferentiated foci. The present study investigated the diagnostic yield of contrast-enhanced CT,
METHODS METHODS
Patients treated with primary or recurrent RPLS who underwent the above imaging between January 2010 and December 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. The diagnostic accuracy of the three modalities for histologic subtype of dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLS) and French Federation of Cancer Center (FNCLCC) grade 2/3 were compared using receiver operating characteristic curves and areas under the curves (AUCs).
RESULTS RESULTS
The cohort involved 32 patients with 53 tumors; 30 of which exhibited DDLS and 31 of which did FNCLCC grades 2/3. The optimal thresholds for predicting DDLS were mean CT value of 31 Hounsfield Unit (HU) (AUC = 0.880, 95% CI 0.775-0.984; p < 0.001), maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of 2.9 (AUC = 0.865 95% CI 0.792-0.980; p < 0.001), while MRI failed to differentiate DDLS. The cutoff values for distinguishing FNCLCC grades 1 and 2/3 were a mean CT value of 24 HU (AUC = 0.858, 95% CI 0.731-0.985; p < 0.001) and SUVmax of 2.9 (AUC = 0.885, 95% CI 0.792-0.978; p < 0.001). MRI had no sufficient power to separate these grades.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Contrast-enhanced CT and PET were useful for predicting DDLS and FNCLCC grade 2/3, while MRI was inferior to these two modalities.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36583836
doi: 10.1007/s10147-022-02287-6
pii: 10.1007/s10147-022-02287-6
doi:

Substances chimiques

Radiopharmaceuticals 0
Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 0Z5B2CJX4D

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

482-490

Informations de copyright

© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Japan Society of Clinical Oncology.

Références

Matthyssens LE, Creytens D, Ceelen WP (2015) Retroperitoneal liposarcoma: current insights in diagnosis and treatment. Front Surg. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2015.00004
doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2015.00004 pubmed: 25713799 pmcid: 4322543
Brennan MF, Antonescu CR, Moraco N et al (2014) Lessons learned from the study of 10,000 patients with soft tissue sarcoma. Ann Surg 260(3):416–422
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000869 pubmed: 25115417
Dehner CA, Hagemann IS, Chrisinger JSA (2021) Retroperitoneal dedifferentiated liposarcoma. Am J Clin Pathol 56(5):920–925
doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqab051
Lahat G, Madewell JE, Anaya DA et al (2009) Computed tomography scan-driven selection of treatment for retroperitoneal liposarcoma histologic subtypes. Cancer 115(5):1081–1090
doi: 10.1002/cncr.24045 pubmed: 19156920
Bhosale P, Wang J, Varma D et al (2016) Can abdominal computed tomography imaging help accurately identify a dedifferentiated component in a well-differentiated liposarcoma? J Comput Assist Tomogr 40(6):872–879
doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000462 pubmed: 27454788 pmcid: 5110394
Parkes A, Urquiola E, Bhosale P et al (2020) PET/CT imaging as a diagnostic tool in distinguishing well-differentiated versus dedifferentiated Liposarcoma. Sarcoma. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8363986
doi: 10.1155/2020/8363986 pubmed: 32565716 pmcid: 7285404
Li CP, Liu DN, Zhou NN et al (2021) Prediction of histologic subtype and FNCLCC grade by SUVmax measured on 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with retroperitoneal Liposarcoma. Contrast Media Mol Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/7191363
doi: 10.1155/2021/7191363 pubmed: 35024015 pmcid: 8719996
Subramaniam S, Callahan J, Bressel M et al (2021) The role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in retroperitoneal sarcomas-a multicenter retrospective study. J Surg Oncol 123(4):1081–1087
doi: 10.1002/jso.26379 pubmed: 33444466
Koh D-M, Collins DJ (2007) Diffusion-weighted MRI in the body: applications and challenges in oncology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188(6):1622–1635
doi: 10.2214/AJR.06.1403 pubmed: 17515386
Padhani AR, Liu G, Koh DM et al (2009) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as a cancer biomarker: consensus and recommendations. Neoplasia 11(2):102–125
doi: 10.1593/neo.81328 pubmed: 19186405 pmcid: 2631136
Bozgeyik Z, Onur MR, Poyraz AK (2013) The role of diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging in oncologic settings. Quant Imaging Med Surg 3(5):269–278
pubmed: 24273745 pmcid: 3834202
Sbaraglia M, Bellan E, Dei Tos AP (2021) The 2020 WHO classification of soft tissue tumours: news and perspectives. Pathologica 113(2):70–84
doi: 10.32074/1591-951X-213 pubmed: 33179614
Guillou L, Coindre JM, Bonichon F et al (1997) Comparative study of the national cancer institute and French federation of cancer centers sarcoma group grading systems in a population of 410 adult patients with soft tissue sarcoma. J Clin Oncol 15(1):350–362
doi: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.1.350 pubmed: 8996162
Xue G, Wang Z, Li C et al (2021) A novel nomogram for predicting local recurrence-free survival after surgical resection for retroperitoneal liposarcoma from a Chinese tertiary cancer center. Int J Clin Oncol 26(1):145–153
doi: 10.1007/s10147-020-01796-6 pubmed: 33068222
van Houdt WJ, Fiore M, Barretta F et al (2020) Patterns of recurrence and survival probability after second recurrence of retroperitoneal sarcoma: A study from TARPSWG. Cancer 126(22):4917–4925
doi: 10.1002/cncr.33139 pubmed: 32797703
Gronchi A, Strauss DC, Miceli R et al (2016) Variability in patterns of recurrence after resection of primary retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS): a report on 1007 patients from the multi-institutional collaborative rps working group. Ann Surg 263(5):1002–1009
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001447 pubmed: 26727100
Singer S, Antonescu CR, Riedel E et al (2003) Histologic subtype and margin of resection predict pattern of recurrence and survival for retroperitoneal liposarcoma. Ann Surg 238(3):358–370
doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000086542.11899.38 pubmed: 14501502 pmcid: 1422708
Tseng WW, Madewell JE, Wei W et al (2014) Locoregional disease patterns in well-differentiated and dedifferentiated retroperitoneal liposarcoma: implications for the extent of resection? Ann Surg Oncol 21(7):2136–2143
doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3643-4 pubmed: 24705628
Jensen OM, Høgh J, Ostgaard SE et al (1991) Histopathological grading of soft tissue tumours prognostic significance in a prospective study of 278 consecutive cases. J Pathol 163(1):19–24
doi: 10.1002/path.1711630105 pubmed: 2002420
Neuhaus SJ, Barry P, Clark MA et al (2005) Surgical management of primary and recurrent retroperitoneal liposarcoma. Br J Surg 92(2):246–252
doi: 10.1002/bjs.4802 pubmed: 15505870
Linehan DC, Lewis JJ, Leung D et al (2000) Influence of biologic factors and anatomic site in completely resected liposarcoma. J Clin Oncol 18(8):1637–1643
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.8.1637 pubmed: 10764423
Jha AK, Rodríguez JJ, Stopeck AT (2016) A maximum-likelihood method to estimate a single ADC value of lesions using diffusion MRI. Magn Reson Med 76(6):1919–1931
doi: 10.1002/mrm.26072 pubmed: 26743234 pmcid: 4937834
Walker-Samuel S, Orton M, Boult JKR et al (2011) Improving apparent diffusion coefficient estimates and elucidating tumor heterogeneity using Bayesian adaptive smoothing. Magn Reson Med 65(2):438–447
doi: 10.1002/mrm.22572 pubmed: 21264934
Walker-Samuel S, Orton M, McPhail LD et al (2009) Robust estimation of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in heterogeneous solid tumors. Magn Reson Med 62(2):420–429
doi: 10.1002/mrm.22014 pubmed: 19353661
Muzaffar R, Koester E, Frye S et al (2020) Development of simple methods to reduce the exposure of the public to radiation from patients who have undergone 18F-FDG PET/CT. J Nucl Med Technol 48(1):63–67
doi: 10.2967/jnmt.119.233296 pubmed: 31604894
Shaish H, Kang SK, Rosenkrantz AB (2017) The utility of quantitative ADC values for differentiating high-risk from low-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Abdom Radiol (NY) 42(1):260–270
doi: 10.1007/s00261-016-0848-y pubmed: 27562768
Hou B, Xiang S-F, Yao G-D et al (2014) Diagnostic significance of diffusion-weighted MRI in patients with cervical cancer: a meta-analysis. Tumour Biol 35(12):11761–11769
doi: 10.1007/s13277-014-2290-5 pubmed: 25168365
Gabelloni M, Faggioni L, Neri E (2019) Imaging biomarkers in upper gastrointestinal cancers. BJR Open. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjro.20190001
doi: 10.1259/bjro.20190001 pubmed: 33178936 pmcid: 7592483
Schurink NW, Lambregts DMJ, Beets-Tan RGH (2019) Diffusion-weighted imaging in rectal cancer: current applications and future perspectives. Br J Radiol 92(1096):20180655
doi: 10.1259/bjr.20180655 pubmed: 30433814 pmcid: 6540856
Satoh S, Kitazume Y, Ohdama S et al (2008) Can malignant and benign pulmonary nodules be differentiated with diffusion-weighted MRI? AJR Am J Roentgenol 191(2):464–470
doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.3133 pubmed: 18647918

Auteurs

Yu Nakashima (Y)

Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan.

Yukihiro Yokoyama (Y)

Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan. yyoko@med.nagoya-u.ac.jp.

Hiroshi Ogawa (H)

Department of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.

Ayako Sakakibara (A)

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.

Masaki Sunagawa (M)

Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan.

Yoshihiro Nishida (Y)

Department of Orthopedics, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.

Takashi Mizuno (T)

Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan.

Junpei Yamaguchi (J)

Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan.

Shunsuke Onoe (S)

Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan.

Nobuyuki Watanabe (N)

Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan.

Shoji Kawakatsu (S)

Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan.

Tsuyoshi Igami (T)

Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan.

Tomoki Ebata (T)

Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH