PsABIOnd Study and eDaily Substudy Design: Long-Term Effectiveness and Safety of Guselkumab and IL-17 Inhibitors in Routine Clinical Practice in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis.
Biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs)
Guselkumab
IL-17 inhibitors
Psoriatic arthritis
Real-world evidence
eHealth
Journal
Rheumatology and therapy
ISSN: 2198-6576
Titre abrégé: Rheumatol Ther
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101674543
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2023
Apr 2023
Historique:
received:
07
10
2022
accepted:
30
11
2022
pubmed:
31
12
2022
medline:
31
12
2022
entrez:
30
12
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Randomised clinical studies in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) do not always reflect patients in routine clinical practice. Large-scale data from routine practice are needed to better understand drug persistence, effectiveness and long-term safety of therapeutic agents. PsABIOnd is an international, prospective, observational study designed to collect long-term routine care data in patients with PsA who receive guselkumab (an interleukin-23 [IL-23] inhibitor) or an interleukin-17 (IL-17) inhibitor. Adult patients (≥ 18 years) with a confirmed diagnosis of PsA who are starting guselkumab or any approved IL-17 inhibitor as a first, second, third or fourth line of PsA treatment and who provide written informed consent will be eligible to participate. Participants will be followed for a maximum of 36 months (+3 months) from the start of treatment. Study visits will occur in line with the standard of care, approximately every 6 months, plus an additional visit at 3 months after the start of treatment. eDaily by PsABIOnd - aneHealth substudy, will document the impact of these treatments on wellbeing and symptoms in a subgroup of participants over a 24-week (+4 weeks) observation period on treatment. The primary objective of PsABIOnd is to evaluate treatment persistence with guselkumab and IL-17 inhibitors. Data sources will include validated electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) and physician-completed assessments. Safety data will be collected through reporting adverse events. The eDaily by PsABIOnd substudy will use wearable and digital technologies for continuous activity and sleep monitoring, and frequent patient eDiary and ePRO collection to provide a more detailed and comprehensive picture of PsA. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05049798. Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a type of arthritis associated with inflammation that occurs in almost one-third of patients with the inflammatory skin condition psoriasis. PsA can vary between individuals, and typically causes joint pain, swelling and stiffness, affecting both physical and social well-being. Over the past decade, several new PsA treatments have become available. However, there is currently a lack of agreement about the best treatment options. As PsA is a chronic (long-term) disease, the duration of time a patient continues taking a prescribed treatment (termed “treatment persistence”) is important. The randomised clinical trials used to determine if a treatment works use strict rules to select patients. Therefore, large studies from everyday practice are needed to better understand the effectiveness and safety of these PsA treatments for a wider range of patients. PsABIOnd is a real-life study that will compare guselkumab (an interleukin-23 inhibitor) and interleukin-17 inhibitors, which are two relatively new types of PsA treatments. The study will provide information about how long patients remain on these treatments and how effectively and safely they work over a 3-year period. PsABIOnd will also explore the impact of PsA on participants’ lives by collecting information about their quality of life, disease activity and treatment satisfaction. In addition, participants also taking part in the eDaily by PsABIOnd substudy will wear a watch-like device and use a smartphone-based app to record measurements including activity, sleep, pain and well-being to give a detailed picture of PsA and its impact on patients’ daily lives.
Autres résumés
Type: plain-language-summary
(eng)
Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a type of arthritis associated with inflammation that occurs in almost one-third of patients with the inflammatory skin condition psoriasis. PsA can vary between individuals, and typically causes joint pain, swelling and stiffness, affecting both physical and social well-being. Over the past decade, several new PsA treatments have become available. However, there is currently a lack of agreement about the best treatment options. As PsA is a chronic (long-term) disease, the duration of time a patient continues taking a prescribed treatment (termed “treatment persistence”) is important. The randomised clinical trials used to determine if a treatment works use strict rules to select patients. Therefore, large studies from everyday practice are needed to better understand the effectiveness and safety of these PsA treatments for a wider range of patients. PsABIOnd is a real-life study that will compare guselkumab (an interleukin-23 inhibitor) and interleukin-17 inhibitors, which are two relatively new types of PsA treatments. The study will provide information about how long patients remain on these treatments and how effectively and safely they work over a 3-year period. PsABIOnd will also explore the impact of PsA on participants’ lives by collecting information about their quality of life, disease activity and treatment satisfaction. In addition, participants also taking part in the eDaily by PsABIOnd substudy will wear a watch-like device and use a smartphone-based app to record measurements including activity, sleep, pain and well-being to give a detailed picture of PsA and its impact on patients’ daily lives.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36585602
doi: 10.1007/s40744-022-00518-w
pii: 10.1007/s40744-022-00518-w
pmc: PMC10011238
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT05049798']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
489-505Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Scotti L, Franchi M, Marchesoni A, Corrao G. Prevalence and incidence of psoriatic arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2018;48(1):28–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2018.01.003 .
doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2018.01.003
pubmed: 29398124
Ritchlin CT, Colbert RA, Gladman DD. Psoriatic arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(10):957–70. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1505557 .
doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1505557
pubmed: 28273019
Ogdie A, Coates LC, Gladman DD. Treatment guidelines in psoriatic arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2020;59(Suppl 1):i37–46. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kez383 .
doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez383
pubmed: 32159790
Lubrano E, Scriffignano S, Perrotta FM. Multimorbidity and comorbidity in psoriatic arthritis—a perspective. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2020;16(10):963–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/1744666X.2021.1825941 .
doi: 10.1080/1744666X.2021.1825941
pubmed: 32940114
Singh JA, Guyatt G, Ogdie A, et al. Special article: 2018 American college of rheumatology/national psoriasis foundation guideline for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019;71(1):5–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.40726 .
doi: 10.1002/art.40726
pubmed: 30499246
Gossec L, Baraliakos X, Kerschbaumer A, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of psoriatic arthritis with pharmacological therapies: 2019 update. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020;79(6):700–12. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217159 .
doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217159
pubmed: 32434812
Coates LC, Kavanaugh A, Mease PJ, et al. Group for research and assessment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis 2015 treatment recommendations for psoriatic arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016;68(5):1060–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39573 .
doi: 10.1002/art.39573
pubmed: 26749174
Gossec L, Coates LC, de Wit M, et al. Management of psoriatic arthritis in 2016: a comparison of EULAR and GRAPPA recommendations. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2016;12(12):743–50. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2016.183 .
doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2016.183
pubmed: 27829672
Dures E, Shepperd S, Mukherjee S, et al. Treat-to-target in PsA: methods and necessity. RMD Open. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2019-001083 .
doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2019-001083
pubmed: 33161377
pmcid: 7856118
Vashisht P, Sayles H, Cannella AC, Mikuls TR, Michaud K. Generalizability of patients with rheumatoid arthritis in biologic agent clinical trials. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2016;68(10):1478–88. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.22860 .
doi: 10.1002/acr.22860
pubmed: 26866293
Yiu ZZN, Mason KJ, Barker J, et al. A standardization approach to compare treatment safety and effectiveness outcomes between clinical trials and real-world populations in psoriasis. Br J Dermatol. 2019;181(6):1265–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.17849 .
doi: 10.1111/bjd.17849
pubmed: 30822358
pmcid: 6916305
Yiu ZZN, Mason KJ, Hampton PJ, et al. Randomized trial replication using observational data for comparative effectiveness of secukinumab and ustekinumab in psoriasis: a study from the British association of dermatologists biologics and immunomodulators register. JAMA Dermatol. 2021;157(1):66–73. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.4202 .
doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.4202
pubmed: 33263718
Zink A, Strangfeld A, Schneider M, et al. Effectiveness of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis in an observational cohort study: comparison of patients according to their eligibility for major randomized clinical trials. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54(11):3399–407. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.22193 .
doi: 10.1002/art.22193
pubmed: 17075823
Houttekiet C, de Vlam K, Neerinckx B, Lories R. Systematic review of the use of CRP in clinical trials for psoriatic arthritis: a concern for clinical practice? RMD Open. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001756 .
doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001756
pubmed: 35135860
pmcid: 8830278
Ishchenko A, Joly J, Neerinckx B, Lories R, de Vlam K. Evolution of patient characteristics in the era of biologic treatment of psoriatic arthritis: 18-year Belgian experience from the Leuven Spondyloarthritis Biologics Cohort (BioSPAR). Rheumatol Adv Pract. 2021;5(3):rkab085. https://doi.org/10.1093/rap/rkab085 .
doi: 10.1093/rap/rkab085
pubmed: 34888434
pmcid: 8651220
Monti S, Grosso V, Todoerti M, Caporali R. Randomized controlled trials and real-world data: differences and similarities to untangle literature data. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2018;57(57 Suppl 7):vii54–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/key109 .
doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/key109
pubmed: 30289534
Fagerli KM, Lie E, van der Heijde D, et al. Switching between TNF inhibitors in psoriatic arthritis: data from the NOR-DMARD study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72(11):1840–4. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-203018 .
doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-203018
pubmed: 23562987
Taylor W, Gladman D, Helliwell P, et al. Classification criteria for psoriatic arthritis: development of new criteria from a large international study. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54(8):2665–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.21972 .
doi: 10.1002/art.21972
pubmed: 16871531
Aletaha D, Alasti F, Smolen JS. Disease activity states of the DAPSA, a psoriatic arthritis specific instrument, are valid against functional status and structural progression. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76(2):418–21. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209511 .
doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209511
pubmed: 27457512
Coates LC, Fransen J, Helliwell PS. Defining minimal disease activity in psoriatic arthritis: a proposed objective target for treatment. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69(1):48–53. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2008.102053 .
doi: 10.1136/ard.2008.102053
pubmed: 19147615
ActiGraph. ActiGraph CentrePoint Insight Watch. 2022. https://actigraphcorp.com/cpiw/ . Accessed 7 Nov 2022.
Smolen JS, Siebert S, Korotaeva TV, et al. Effectiveness of IL-12/23 inhibition (ustekinumab) versus tumour necrosis factor inhibition in psoriatic arthritis: observational PsABio study results. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021;80(11):1419–28. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-220263 .
doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-220263
pubmed: 34162594