PsABIOnd Study and eDaily Substudy Design: Long-Term Effectiveness and Safety of Guselkumab and IL-17 Inhibitors in Routine Clinical Practice in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis.

Biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) Guselkumab IL-17 inhibitors Psoriatic arthritis Real-world evidence eHealth

Journal

Rheumatology and therapy
ISSN: 2198-6576
Titre abrégé: Rheumatol Ther
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101674543

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Apr 2023
Historique:
received: 07 10 2022
accepted: 30 11 2022
pubmed: 31 12 2022
medline: 31 12 2022
entrez: 30 12 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Randomised clinical studies in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) do not always reflect patients in routine clinical practice. Large-scale data from routine practice are needed to better understand drug persistence, effectiveness and long-term safety of therapeutic agents. PsABIOnd is an international, prospective, observational study designed to collect long-term routine care data in patients with PsA who receive guselkumab (an interleukin-23 [IL-23] inhibitor) or an interleukin-17 (IL-17) inhibitor. Adult patients (≥ 18 years) with a confirmed diagnosis of PsA who are starting guselkumab or any approved IL-17 inhibitor as a first, second, third or fourth line of PsA treatment and who provide written informed consent will be eligible to participate. Participants will be followed for a maximum of 36 months (+3 months) from the start of treatment. Study visits will occur in line with the standard of care, approximately every 6 months, plus an additional visit at 3 months after the start of treatment. eDaily by PsABIOnd - aneHealth substudy, will document the impact of these treatments on wellbeing and symptoms in a subgroup of participants over a 24-week (+4 weeks) observation period on treatment. The primary objective of PsABIOnd is to evaluate treatment persistence with guselkumab and IL-17 inhibitors. Data sources will include validated electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) and physician-completed assessments. Safety data will be collected through reporting adverse events. The eDaily by PsABIOnd substudy will use wearable and digital technologies for continuous activity and sleep monitoring, and frequent patient eDiary and ePRO collection to provide a more detailed and comprehensive picture of PsA. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05049798. Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a type of arthritis associated with inflammation that occurs in almost one-third of patients with the inflammatory skin condition psoriasis. PsA can vary between individuals, and typically causes joint pain, swelling and stiffness, affecting both physical and social well-being. Over the past decade, several new PsA treatments have become available. However, there is currently a lack of agreement about the best treatment options. As PsA is a chronic (long-term) disease, the duration of time a patient continues taking a prescribed treatment (termed “treatment persistence”) is important. The randomised clinical trials used to determine if a treatment works use strict rules to select patients. Therefore, large studies from everyday practice are needed to better understand the effectiveness and safety of these PsA treatments for a wider range of patients. PsABIOnd is a real-life study that will compare guselkumab (an interleukin-23 inhibitor) and interleukin-17 inhibitors, which are two relatively new types of PsA treatments. The study will provide information about how long patients remain on these treatments and how effectively and safely they work over a 3-year period. PsABIOnd will also explore the impact of PsA on participants’ lives by collecting information about their quality of life, disease activity and treatment satisfaction. In addition, participants also taking part in the eDaily by PsABIOnd substudy will wear a watch-like device and use a smartphone-based app to record measurements including activity, sleep, pain and well-being to give a detailed picture of PsA and its impact on patients’ daily lives.

Autres résumés

Type: plain-language-summary (eng)
Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a type of arthritis associated with inflammation that occurs in almost one-third of patients with the inflammatory skin condition psoriasis. PsA can vary between individuals, and typically causes joint pain, swelling and stiffness, affecting both physical and social well-being. Over the past decade, several new PsA treatments have become available. However, there is currently a lack of agreement about the best treatment options. As PsA is a chronic (long-term) disease, the duration of time a patient continues taking a prescribed treatment (termed “treatment persistence”) is important. The randomised clinical trials used to determine if a treatment works use strict rules to select patients. Therefore, large studies from everyday practice are needed to better understand the effectiveness and safety of these PsA treatments for a wider range of patients. PsABIOnd is a real-life study that will compare guselkumab (an interleukin-23 inhibitor) and interleukin-17 inhibitors, which are two relatively new types of PsA treatments. The study will provide information about how long patients remain on these treatments and how effectively and safely they work over a 3-year period. PsABIOnd will also explore the impact of PsA on participants’ lives by collecting information about their quality of life, disease activity and treatment satisfaction. In addition, participants also taking part in the eDaily by PsABIOnd substudy will wear a watch-like device and use a smartphone-based app to record measurements including activity, sleep, pain and well-being to give a detailed picture of PsA and its impact on patients’ daily lives.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36585602
doi: 10.1007/s40744-022-00518-w
pii: 10.1007/s40744-022-00518-w
pmc: PMC10011238
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT05049798']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

489-505

Informations de copyright

© 2022. The Author(s).

Références

Scotti L, Franchi M, Marchesoni A, Corrao G. Prevalence and incidence of psoriatic arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2018;48(1):28–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2018.01.003 .
doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2018.01.003 pubmed: 29398124
Ritchlin CT, Colbert RA, Gladman DD. Psoriatic arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(10):957–70. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1505557 .
doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1505557 pubmed: 28273019
Ogdie A, Coates LC, Gladman DD. Treatment guidelines in psoriatic arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2020;59(Suppl 1):i37–46. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kez383 .
doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez383 pubmed: 32159790
Lubrano E, Scriffignano S, Perrotta FM. Multimorbidity and comorbidity in psoriatic arthritis—a perspective. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2020;16(10):963–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/1744666X.2021.1825941 .
doi: 10.1080/1744666X.2021.1825941 pubmed: 32940114
Singh JA, Guyatt G, Ogdie A, et al. Special article: 2018 American college of rheumatology/national psoriasis foundation guideline for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019;71(1):5–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.40726 .
doi: 10.1002/art.40726 pubmed: 30499246
Gossec L, Baraliakos X, Kerschbaumer A, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of psoriatic arthritis with pharmacological therapies: 2019 update. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020;79(6):700–12. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217159 .
doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217159 pubmed: 32434812
Coates LC, Kavanaugh A, Mease PJ, et al. Group for research and assessment of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis 2015 treatment recommendations for psoriatic arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016;68(5):1060–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39573 .
doi: 10.1002/art.39573 pubmed: 26749174
Gossec L, Coates LC, de Wit M, et al. Management of psoriatic arthritis in 2016: a comparison of EULAR and GRAPPA recommendations. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2016;12(12):743–50. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2016.183 .
doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2016.183 pubmed: 27829672
Dures E, Shepperd S, Mukherjee S, et al. Treat-to-target in PsA: methods and necessity. RMD Open. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2019-001083 .
doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2019-001083 pubmed: 33161377 pmcid: 7856118
Vashisht P, Sayles H, Cannella AC, Mikuls TR, Michaud K. Generalizability of patients with rheumatoid arthritis in biologic agent clinical trials. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2016;68(10):1478–88. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.22860 .
doi: 10.1002/acr.22860 pubmed: 26866293
Yiu ZZN, Mason KJ, Barker J, et al. A standardization approach to compare treatment safety and effectiveness outcomes between clinical trials and real-world populations in psoriasis. Br J Dermatol. 2019;181(6):1265–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.17849 .
doi: 10.1111/bjd.17849 pubmed: 30822358 pmcid: 6916305
Yiu ZZN, Mason KJ, Hampton PJ, et al. Randomized trial replication using observational data for comparative effectiveness of secukinumab and ustekinumab in psoriasis: a study from the British association of dermatologists biologics and immunomodulators register. JAMA Dermatol. 2021;157(1):66–73. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.4202 .
doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.4202 pubmed: 33263718
Zink A, Strangfeld A, Schneider M, et al. Effectiveness of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis in an observational cohort study: comparison of patients according to their eligibility for major randomized clinical trials. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54(11):3399–407. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.22193 .
doi: 10.1002/art.22193 pubmed: 17075823
Houttekiet C, de Vlam K, Neerinckx B, Lories R. Systematic review of the use of CRP in clinical trials for psoriatic arthritis: a concern for clinical practice? RMD Open. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001756 .
doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001756 pubmed: 35135860 pmcid: 8830278
Ishchenko A, Joly J, Neerinckx B, Lories R, de Vlam K. Evolution of patient characteristics in the era of biologic treatment of psoriatic arthritis: 18-year Belgian experience from the Leuven Spondyloarthritis Biologics Cohort (BioSPAR). Rheumatol Adv Pract. 2021;5(3):rkab085. https://doi.org/10.1093/rap/rkab085 .
doi: 10.1093/rap/rkab085 pubmed: 34888434 pmcid: 8651220
Monti S, Grosso V, Todoerti M, Caporali R. Randomized controlled trials and real-world data: differences and similarities to untangle literature data. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2018;57(57 Suppl 7):vii54–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/key109 .
doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/key109 pubmed: 30289534
Fagerli KM, Lie E, van der Heijde D, et al. Switching between TNF inhibitors in psoriatic arthritis: data from the NOR-DMARD study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72(11):1840–4. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-203018 .
doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-203018 pubmed: 23562987
Taylor W, Gladman D, Helliwell P, et al. Classification criteria for psoriatic arthritis: development of new criteria from a large international study. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54(8):2665–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.21972 .
doi: 10.1002/art.21972 pubmed: 16871531
Aletaha D, Alasti F, Smolen JS. Disease activity states of the DAPSA, a psoriatic arthritis specific instrument, are valid against functional status and structural progression. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76(2):418–21. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209511 .
doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209511 pubmed: 27457512
Coates LC, Fransen J, Helliwell PS. Defining minimal disease activity in psoriatic arthritis: a proposed objective target for treatment. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69(1):48–53. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2008.102053 .
doi: 10.1136/ard.2008.102053 pubmed: 19147615
ActiGraph. ActiGraph CentrePoint Insight Watch. 2022. https://actigraphcorp.com/cpiw/ . Accessed 7 Nov 2022.
Smolen JS, Siebert S, Korotaeva TV, et al. Effectiveness of IL-12/23 inhibition (ustekinumab) versus tumour necrosis factor inhibition in psoriatic arthritis: observational PsABio study results. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021;80(11):1419–28. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-220263 .
doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-220263 pubmed: 34162594

Auteurs

Stefan Siebert (S)

School of Infection and Immunity, College of Medical, Veterinary & Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK. stefan.siebert@glasgow.ac.uk.

Frank Behrens (F)

Rheumatology and Fraunhofer TMP, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Ennio Lubrano (E)

Vincenzo Tiberio Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Molise, Campobasso, Italy.

Nicolas Martin (N)

Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson, Allschwil, Switzerland.

Mohamed Sharaf (M)

Johnson and Johnson Middle East, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.

Christine Contré (C)

Previous Employee of Janssen-Cilag, Issy-les-Moulineaux, France.

Elke Theander (E)

Previous Employee of Janssen-Cilag AB, Solna, Sweden.

Rubén Queiro (R)

Rheumatology Division & ISPA Translational Immunology Division, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo University, Oviedo, Spain.

Miriam Zimmermann (M)

Immunology, Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Zug, Switzerland.

Laure Gossec (L)

Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Paris, France.
Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, APHP, Rheumatology Department, Paris, France.

Classifications MeSH