Bridging Radiation Rapidly and Effectively Cytoreduces High-Risk Relapsed/Refractory Aggressive B Cell Lymphomas Prior to Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy.
Bridging
Chimeric antigen receptor T cell
Diffuse large B cell lymphoma
Lymphoma
Radiation
Journal
Transplantation and cellular therapy
ISSN: 2666-6367
Titre abrégé: Transplant Cell Ther
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101774629
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2023
04 2023
Historique:
received:
29
09
2022
revised:
22
11
2022
accepted:
26
12
2022
pmc-release:
01
04
2024
medline:
28
3
2023
pubmed:
2
1
2023
entrez:
1
1
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Greater tumor burden before CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy predicts lower complete response rate and shorter overall survival (OS) in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Recent patterns of failure studies have identified lesion characteristics, including size, standard uptake value (SUV), and extranodal location, as associated with post-CAR-T therapy failure. Here we analyzed the effect of bridging radiation-containing treatment (BRT) on pre-CAR-T therapy lesion- and patient-level characteristics and post-CAR-T therapy outcomes, including patterns of failure. Consecutive NHL patients who received radiation therapy from 30 days before leukapheresis until CAR T cell infusion were reviewed. Metabolic tumor volume (MTV) was contoured with a threshold SUV of 4. The first post-CAR-T therapy failures were categorized as preexisting/new/mixed with respect to pre-CAR-T therapy disease and in-field/marginal/distant with respect to BRT. Forty-one patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL; n = 33), mantle cell lymphoma (n = 7), or Burkitt lymphoma (n = 1) were identified. BRT significantly improved established high-risk parameters of post-CAR-T therapy progression, including in-field median MTV (45.5 cc to .2 cc; P < .001), maximum SUV (18.1 to 4.4; P < .001), diameter (5.5 cm to 3.2 cm; P < .001), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH; 312 to 232; P = .025). DLBCL patients with lower LDH levels post-BRT had improved progression-free survival (PFS; P = .001). In DLBCL, first failures were new in 7 of 19 patients, preexisting in 5 of 19, and mixed in 7 of 19; with respect to BRT, 4 of 19 were in-field and 4 of 19 were marginal. Post-CAR-T therapy survival was similar in patients with initially low MTV and those with newly low MTV post-BRT using a statistically determined threshold of 16 cc (PFS, 26 months versus 31 months; OS unreached for both). BRT produced significant cytoreductions in diameter, SUV, MTV, and LDH, all predictors of poor post-CAR-T therapy outcomes. Similar PFS and OS in patients with initially low MTV and those who achieved newly low MTV after BRT suggest that BRT may "convert" poor-risk patients to better risk. In the future, the response to BRT may allow for risk stratification and individualization of bridging strategies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36587744
pii: S2666-6367(22)01870-X
doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2022.12.021
pmc: PMC10089652
mid: NIHMS1861575
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Receptors, Chimeric Antigen
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
259.e1-259.e10Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA008748
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Références
Mol Ther. 2018 Nov 7;26(11):2542-2552
pubmed: 30415658
Blood Adv. 2020 Jul 28;4(14):3268-3276
pubmed: 32702097
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Sep 20;38(27):3119-3128
pubmed: 32401634
Cancer Med. 2021 May;10(10):3214-3223
pubmed: 33932100
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020 Sep 1;108(1):178-188
pubmed: 32446950
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Jan;20(1):31-42
pubmed: 30518502
J Immunother. 2020 Jan;43(1):32-37
pubmed: 31219975
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2021 Dec 1;111(5):1145-1154
pubmed: 34242714
Blood Adv. 2020 Aug 11;4(15):3776-3787
pubmed: 32780846
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2019 Apr;25(4):625-638
pubmed: 30592986
Lancet Oncol. 2021 Oct;22(10):1403-1415
pubmed: 34516954
Lancet. 2020 Sep 19;396(10254):839-852
pubmed: 32888407
Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2020 Aug;28(4):1189-1196
pubmed: 32798397
Blood Adv. 2020 Oct 13;4(19):4898-4911
pubmed: 33035333
Clin Nucl Med. 2021 Aug 1;46(8):627-634
pubmed: 34115706
Radiother Oncol. 2022 Jan;166:171-179
pubmed: 34890736
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2019 Jun;25(6):1092-1098
pubmed: 30769193
N Engl J Med. 2022 Feb 17;386(7):640-654
pubmed: 34891224
Br J Radiol. 2021 Nov 1;94(1127):20210098
pubmed: 34375124
Nature. 2015 Apr 16;520(7547):373-7
pubmed: 25754329
Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018 Feb;52(1):5-15
pubmed: 29391907
Front Oncol. 2021 Aug 04;11:713577
pubmed: 34422666
Blood Adv. 2021 Sep 14;5(17):3397-3406
pubmed: 34432870
N Engl J Med. 2021 Mar 4;384(9):842-858
pubmed: 33657296
Ann Hematol. 2021 Sep;100(9):2303-2310
pubmed: 34236497
Radiology. 2015 Aug;276(2):323-38
pubmed: 26203705
Blood Adv. 2020 Nov 24;4(22):5607-5615
pubmed: 33180899
Blood Adv. 2020 Jul 14;4(13):2871-2883
pubmed: 32589728
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 Mar 1;100(3):652-669
pubmed: 29413279
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Dec 1;105(5):1012-1021
pubmed: 31175906
N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 2;382(14):1331-1342
pubmed: 32242358