Insurance Coverage of Prophylactic Mastectomies: A National Review of the United States.

Breast Breast neoplasms Hereditary cancer syndromes Insurance XCoverage Mastectomy Prophylactic mastectomy Prophylactic surgical procedures Risk reduction

Journal

Clinical breast cancer
ISSN: 1938-0666
Titre abrégé: Clin Breast Cancer
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100898731

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 2023
Historique:
received: 21 09 2022
accepted: 01 12 2022
pubmed: 2 1 2023
medline: 4 2 2023
entrez: 1 1 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Breast cancer is associated with a multitude of risk factors, such as genetic predisposition and mutations, family history, personal medical history, or previous radiotherapy. A prophylactic mastectomy (PM) may be considered a suitable risk-reducing procedure in some cases. However, there are significant discrepancies between national society recommendations and insurance company requirements for PM. The authors conducted a cross-sectional analysis of insurance policies for a PM. One-hundred companies were selected based on the greatest state enrolment and market share. Their policies were identified through a Web-based search and telephone interviews, and their medical necessity criteria were extracted. Preauthorized coverage of PMs was provided by 39% of insurance policies (n = 39) and 5 indications were identified. There was consensus amongst these policies to cover a PM for BRCA1/2 mutations (n = 39, 100%), but was more variable for other genetic mutations (15%-90%). Coverage of PM for the remaining indications varied among insurers: previous radiotherapy (92%), pathological changes in the breast (3%-92%), personal history of cancer (64%) and family history risk factors (39%-51%). There is a marked level of variability in both the indications and medical necessity criteria for PM insurance policies. The decision to undergo a PM must be carefully considered with a patient's care team and should not be affected by insurance coverage status.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Breast cancer is associated with a multitude of risk factors, such as genetic predisposition and mutations, family history, personal medical history, or previous radiotherapy. A prophylactic mastectomy (PM) may be considered a suitable risk-reducing procedure in some cases. However, there are significant discrepancies between national society recommendations and insurance company requirements for PM.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The authors conducted a cross-sectional analysis of insurance policies for a PM. One-hundred companies were selected based on the greatest state enrolment and market share. Their policies were identified through a Web-based search and telephone interviews, and their medical necessity criteria were extracted.
RESULTS
Preauthorized coverage of PMs was provided by 39% of insurance policies (n = 39) and 5 indications were identified. There was consensus amongst these policies to cover a PM for BRCA1/2 mutations (n = 39, 100%), but was more variable for other genetic mutations (15%-90%). Coverage of PM for the remaining indications varied among insurers: previous radiotherapy (92%), pathological changes in the breast (3%-92%), personal history of cancer (64%) and family history risk factors (39%-51%).
CONCLUSION
There is a marked level of variability in both the indications and medical necessity criteria for PM insurance policies. The decision to undergo a PM must be carefully considered with a patient's care team and should not be affected by insurance coverage status.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36588087
pii: S1526-8209(22)00269-5
doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2022.12.001
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

211-218

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Disclosure The authors have stated that they have no conflicts of interest.

Auteurs

Michael Ha (M)

Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.

Ledibabari M Ngaage (LM)

Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.

Emily R Finkelstein (ER)

Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL. Electronic address: erf92@miami.edu.

Marissa Klein (M)

Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.

Annie Yanga (A)

Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.

Shannon M Colohan (SM)

Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.

Suliat M Nurudeen (SM)

Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.

Julia H Terhune (JH)

Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.

Sheri Slezak (S)

Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.

Yvonne M Rasko (YM)

Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH