Voices to be heard: Understanding family perspectives in forensic care trajectories.

Persons labeled as Not Criminally Responsible care trajectories family recovery forensic psychiatry qualitative research

Journal

Frontiers in psychiatry
ISSN: 1664-0640
Titre abrégé: Front Psychiatry
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101545006

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 18 08 2022
accepted: 28 11 2022
entrez: 2 1 2023
pubmed: 3 1 2023
medline: 3 1 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

De-institutionalization of psychiatric care has greatly increased the role of family members in the recovery pathways of Persons labeled as Not Criminally Responsible (PNCR). However, the role of family members in supporting PNCR in forensic psychiatric care remains understudied. Scarce evidence indicates that PNCR have to deal with stigma and endure specific burdens (i.e., symptom-specific, financial, social, and emotional). Recovery-focused research showed that recovery in both persons with a severe mental illness and family members develop in parallel with each other and are characterized by similar helpful principles (e.g., hope and coping skills). As such, the recovery pathways of PNCR often goes hand in hand with the recovery pathway of their family members. During the family recovery process, family members often experience not being listened to or being empowered by professionals or not being involved in the decision-making process in the care trajectory of their relative. Therefore, the aim of this study is to capture how family members experience the care trajectories of their relatives, more specifically by looking at family recovery aspects and personal advocacy of family members. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 21 family members of PNCR from 14 families. A thematic analysis confirms that family members suffer from stigma and worry significantly about the future of their relative. Regarding the care trajectory of PNCR, family members experienced barriers in multiple domains while trying to support their relative: involvement in care and information sharing, visiting procedures, transitions between wards, and the psychiatric and judicial reporting by professionals. In addition, family members emphasized the importance of (social) support for themselves during the forensic psychiatric care trajectories and of a shared partnership. These findings tie in with procedural justice theory as a precondition for family support and family recovery within forensic psychiatric care.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36590630
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1022490
pmc: PMC9798123
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1022490

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Rowaert, De Pau, De Meyer, Nicaise, Vander Laenen and Vanderplasschen.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Health Expect. 2018 Feb;21(1):192-200
pubmed: 28779520
Int J Health Serv. 2017 Jul;47(3):532-549
pubmed: 26588941
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2011 Jun;199(6):398-402
pubmed: 21629019
Fam Process. 2016 Sep;55(3):460-82
pubmed: 27411376
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2006 Jan-Feb;29(1):57-67
pubmed: 16278016
Int J Rehabil Res. 2016 Mar;39(1):11-9
pubmed: 26756851
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2017 Sep;38(9):705-711
pubmed: 28613093
Eur Psychiatry. 2018 Jun;51:58-73
pubmed: 29571072
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 May 15;17(1):349
pubmed: 28506296
Community Ment Health J. 2010 Oct;46(5):482-5
pubmed: 20464490
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2012 Feb;24(1):11-8
pubmed: 22385422
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2016 Sep;51(9):1233-45
pubmed: 27357819
Ir J Psychol Med. 2008 Dec;25(4):123-127
pubmed: 30282248
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2019 May;63(6):919-939
pubmed: 28893122
Community Ment Health J. 2008 Oct;44(5):337-45
pubmed: 18437570
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2018 Oct;27(5):1535-1545
pubmed: 29573117
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2015 Dec;59(14):1605-22
pubmed: 25583981
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2017 Sep - Oct;54:76-82
pubmed: 28528986
Int J Rehabil Res. 2002 Jan;25(1):25-32
pubmed: 11953712
BJPsych Open. 2021 Dec 17;8(1):e17
pubmed: 34915963
Collegian. 2006 Jul;13(3):6-10
pubmed: 17036449
Community Ment Health J. 2015 Oct;51(7):761-7
pubmed: 25947133
Eur Psychiatry. 2011 May;26(4):201-7
pubmed: 20965119
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2022 Dec;41:124-131
pubmed: 36428040
J Res Nurs. 2020 Dec;25(8):664-676
pubmed: 34394689
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2004 Jul-Aug;27(4):361-74
pubmed: 15271530
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2008 Feb;17(1):44-56
pubmed: 18211403
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2020 Jan - Feb;68:101539
pubmed: 32033703
Health Place. 2019 Jan;55:29-36
pubmed: 30466813

Auteurs

Sara Rowaert (S)

Department of Special Needs Education, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Marjolein De Pau (M)

Department of Criminology, Criminal Law and Social Law, Institute for International Research on Criminal Policy (IRCP), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Florian De Meyer (F)

Department of Special Needs Education, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Pablo Nicaise (P)

Faculty of Public Health, Institute of Health and Society (IRSS), Catholic University of Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.

Freya Vander Laenen (F)

Department of Criminology, Criminal Law and Social Law, Institute for International Research on Criminal Policy (IRCP), Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Wouter Vanderplasschen (W)

Department of Special Needs Education, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Classifications MeSH