What is the relative risk of urologic malignancy in microscopic hematuria patients after negative evaluation? A long-term population-based retrospective analysis of 8465 patients.


Journal

Abdominal radiology (New York)
ISSN: 2366-0058
Titre abrégé: Abdom Radiol (NY)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101674571

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 2023
Historique:
received: 25 07 2022
accepted: 23 12 2022
revised: 22 12 2022
pubmed: 3 1 2023
medline: 25 2 2023
entrez: 2 1 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To evaluate whether microscopic hematuria (MH) patients with a negative initial evaluation have an elevated risk for urinary carcinoma. This is a population-based retrospective study with a matched control identified 8465 adults with an MH ICD code, an initial negative urinary malignancy work-up of cystoscopy and CT urography, and at least 35 months of clinical care. 8465 hematuria naïve controls were age, gender, and smoking status matched. Subsequent coding of non-prostatic urinary cancer, or any following hematuria codes: additional microscopic unspecified or unspecified hematuria, and gross hematuria was obtained. Χ There was no statistically significant difference in urinary malignancy rates (p > 0.05). Any urinary cancer: cases 0.74% (63/8465; 95% CI 0.58-0.95%)/controls 0.83% (71/8465; 95% CI 0.66-1.04%%) (p = 0.54); bladder: 0.45%/0.47% (p = 0.82); renal: 0.31%/0.38% (p = 0.43); ureteral: 0.01%/0.02% (p = 0.56). Subsequent gross hematuria in both males and females increased the odds of cancer: males 2.35 (p = 0.001; CI 1.42-3.91); females 4.25 (p < 0.001; CI 1.94-9.34). Males without additional hematuria had decreased odds ratio: 0.32 (p = 0.001; CI 0.16-0.64). Females without additional hematuria 0.58 (p = 0.19; CI 0.26-1.30) and both genders with additional unspecified hematuria/microscopic hematuria males 1.02 (p = 0.97; CI 0.50-2.08) and females 1.00 (p = 0.99; CI 0.38-2.66) did not have increased odds ratios (p > 0.05). MH patients with initial negative evaluation have a subsequent urologic malignancy rate of less than 1% and likely do not need further urinary evaluation unless they develop gross hematuria.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36592198
doi: 10.1007/s00261-022-03793-x
pii: 10.1007/s00261-022-03793-x
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1011-1019

Informations de copyright

© 2023. This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply.

Références

Barocas DA, Boorjian SA, Alvarez RD, et al. Microhematuria: AUA/SUFU guideline. J Urol. 2020;204(4):778-786.
doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001297 pubmed: 32698717
Davis R, Jones JS, Barocas DA, et al. Diagnosis, evaluation and follow-up of asymptomatic microhematuria (AMH) in adults: AUA guideline. The Journal of urology. 2012 Dec;188(6S):2473-81.
doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.09.078 pubmed: 23098784
Madeb R, Golijanin D, Knopf J, et al. Long-term Outcome of Patients With a Negative Work-up for Asymptomatic Microhematuria. J Urol 2010;75(1):20-25.
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.06.107
Pichler R, Heidbegger I, Leonhartsberger N, et al. The Need for Repeated Urological Evaluation in Low-risk Patients with Microscopic Hematuria After Negative Diagnostic Work-Up. Anticancer Res 2013; 33:5525-5530.
pubmed: 24324092
Mishriki SF, Nabi G, Cohen NP. Diagnosis of urologic malignancies in patients with asymptomatic dipstick hematuria: prospective study with 13 years’ follow-up. Urology. 2008 Jan 1;71(1):13-6.
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.08.031 pubmed: 18242356
Murakami S, Igarashi T, Hara S, Shimazaki J. Strategies for Asymptomatic Microscopic Hematuria: A Prospective Study of 1,034 Patients. J Urol 1990; 144:99-101.
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)39379-5 pubmed: 2193173
Wakui M, Shiigai T. Urinary tract cancer screening through analysis of urinary red blood cell volume distribution. International Journal of Urology. 2000 Jul;7(7):248-53.
doi: 10.1046/j.1442-2042.2000.00184.x pubmed: 10910226
Howard RS, Golin AL. Long-term followup of asymptomatic microhematuria. The Journal of urology. 1991 Feb 1;145(2):335-6.
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)38331-3 pubmed: 1988725
Davides KC, King LM, and Jacobs D: Management of microscopic hematuria: twenty-year experience with 150 cases in a community hospital. Urology 28: 453–455, 1986.
doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(86)90142-1 pubmed: 3787916
Edwards TJ, Dickinson AJ, Gosling J,McInerney PD, Natale S, McGrath JS. Patient-specific risk of undetected malignant disease after investigation for haematuria, based on a 4-year follow-up. BJU Int 2011;107:247–52.
doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09521.x pubmed: 20726979
Smith MR, Read KC, Stegman ML, Kroll NJ, Van Every MJ. Evaluation of asymptomatic microscopic hematuria by renal ultrasound to detect upper tract malignancy: a 20-year experience in a community hospital. Urology. 2019 Nov 1;133:34-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.07.009
Rothmans K. Epidemiology: An Introduction, Oxford University Press, 2002:132.
Pak JS, Wang EY, Lee K, Pina LA, McKiernan JM, Anderson CB. Diagnostic yield of repeat evaluation for asymptomatic microscopic hematuria after negative initial work-up. Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations 2021 May 1;39 (5):300-e1.
doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.11.032
Jaffe JS, Ginsberg PC, Gill RA, Harkaway RC. A new diagnostic algorithm for the evaluation of microscopic hematuria. Urology. 2001 May 1;57(5):889-94.
doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(00)01124-9 pubmed: 11337288
Ghandour R, Freifeld Y, Singla N, Lotan Y. Evaluation of hematuria in a large public health care system. Bladder Cancer. 2019 Jan 1;5(2):119-29.
doi: 10.3233/BLC-190221 pubmed: 31930164 pmcid: 6953989
Edwards TJ, Dickinson AJ, Natalie S, Gosling J, McGrath JS. A Prospective Analysis of the Diagnostic Yield Resulting From the Attendance of 4020 Patients at a Protocol-Driven Hematuria Clinic. BJU Int. 2006;97(2): 301-305.
doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.05976.x pubmed: 16430634
Yecies T, Bandari J, Fam M,Macleod L, Jacobs B, Davies B. Risk of Radiation from Computerized Tomography Urography in the Evaluation of Asymptomatic Microscopic Hematuria. J. Oncol 2018; 200:967-972.
Khadra MH, Pickard RS, Charlton M, Powell PH, Neal DE. A Prospective Analysis of 1,930 Patients with Hematuria to Evaluate Current Diagnostic Practice. J Urol 2000; 163:524-527.
doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67916-5 pubmed: 10647670

Auteurs

Christopher J Lisanti (CJ)

Brooke Army Medical Center, 3551 Roger Brooke Dr., Ft., Sam Houston, TX, USA. Lisantic@aol.com.
Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA. Lisantic@aol.com.

Adam Graeber (A)

Brooke Army Medical Center, 3551 Roger Brooke Dr., Ft., Sam Houston, TX, USA.

Helal Syed (H)

Brooke Army Medical Center, 3551 Roger Brooke Dr., Ft., Sam Houston, TX, USA.

Adam Moeck (A)

Brooke Army Medical Center, 3551 Roger Brooke Dr., Ft., Sam Houston, TX, USA.

Alexander G Rittel (AG)

Defense Healthcare Management Systems, San Antonio, TX, USA.

James K Aden (JK)

Brooke Army Medical Center, 3551 Roger Brooke Dr., Ft., Sam Houston, TX, USA.

Ryan Schwope (R)

Brooke Army Medical Center, 3551 Roger Brooke Dr., Ft., Sam Houston, TX, USA.
Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA.

Forrest Jellison (F)

Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, CA, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH