Guided Self-Help for People with Chronic Pain: Integrated Care in a Public Tertiary Pain Clinic-A Pilot Study.

Behavioural health coach Chronic pain Cognitive behavioural therapy Guided self-help Integrated care Knowledge translation Self-management Telehealth

Journal

Pain and therapy
ISSN: 2193-8237
Titre abrégé: Pain Ther
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101634491

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Apr 2023
Historique:
received: 25 09 2022
accepted: 22 11 2022
pubmed: 4 1 2023
medline: 4 1 2023
entrez: 3 1 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Globally, chronic pain affects more than 30% of people worldwide and is the leading cause of disability and health care utilisation. Access to timely, person-centred, cost-effective programs is unattainable for most. People living in regional, rural and remote areas are disproportionately affected due to scarcity of services and qualified, multidisciplinary health and medical professionals. Caring and supporting people with chronic pain involves a range of interventions that incorporate a multifaceted bio-psychosocial approach. Tertiary and primary chronic pain services are optimally placed to deliver integrated models of care. This pilot study explored the effectiveness of an integrated Guided Self-Help (GSH) program within a multidisciplinary tertiary pain unit in a public hospital in Australia. A service delivery evaluation was undertaken and a pilot study implemented to determine feasibility and useability of an integrated GSH program for people with chronic pain. A single-group pre-post evaluation was provided to a convenience sample of 42 people referred to the Flinders Medical Centre Pain Management Unit (FMC PMU). Delivered via telehealth or in person by postgraduate students, a manualised GSH workbook was utilised to support adherence and fidelity. Content included goal setting, pain conceptualisation, psychoeducation, activity scheduling, pacing and cognitive strategies. The purpose of the integrated GSH pilot program was to support participants in gaining increased pain literacy, knowledge of effective physical and psychological strategies and enhance self-management of their chronic pain. Levels of psychological distress (PHQ-9 and GAD-7), pain catastrophising (PCS), and pain severity/interference (BPI) were assessed at the beginning and end of support. Integrating the program within a multidisciplinary pain unit intended to facilitate and provide participants with an understanding of their pain through a psychosocial lens, build self-efficacy, and recognise the benefits of other non-medical supports to manage their chronic pain in the future. Outcome data were routinely collected as part of FMC PMU usual practice for clinical and quality assurance purposes, then analysed retrospectively. Thus, under the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Ethical Considerations in Quality Assurance and Evaluation Activities guidelines (NHMRC, 2014), and verified by the Southern Adelaide Local Health Network (SALHN) Research Committee (our institutional review board) via email (dated 10/09/2020), ethical review and approval were not required for this project as it constituted a quality improvement activity - specifically, a service delivery evaluation. This project is registered with the SALHN Quality Library (for quality assurance activities that are exempt from ethical approval) (Quality Register ID 3390). Participants showed statistically significant improvements on the PHQ-9 [i.e., mean drop of 2.85 (t = 3.16)], GAD [mean drop of 2.52 (t = 2.71)], and PCS [mean drop of 7.77 (t = 3.47)] with small-to-moderate effect sizes. BPI scores did not change. Results were similar when stratifying analyses by those who completed 2-5 versus 6-12 sessions. Integrating a GSH program for people with chronic pain into a multidisciplinary tertiary pain clinic is an efficacious and scalable way to increase access to effective strategies that can increase self-efficacy and self-management. Novel, scalable, and effective solutions are needed to improve quality of life and address disparities for people with chronic pain. The psychological shifts and benefits observed support efficacy towards self-management strategies that can increase autonomy and quality of life. Globally, chronic pain affects more than 30% of people worldwide and is the leading cause of disability and healthcare use. Access to available, effective, and individualised programs is unattainable . People living in regional, rural and remote areas are disproportionately affected due to scarcity of services and qualified, multidisciplinary health and medical professionals. Scalable solutions are needed to increase access to effective, evidence-based care options and reduce inequities for people with chronic pain. Caring and supporting people with chronic pain requires effective, multifaceted bio-psychosocial approaches that are tailored to individual needs. Using ‘coaches’, a manualised Guided Self-Help (GSH) program was integrated within a multidisciplinary tertiary pain unit in a public hospital in Australia, which showed promising solutions to increasing access and availability of timely, cost-effective supports that can be delivered via mobile devices. This pilot study explored the effectiveness of offering a GSH program to people with chronic pain integrated into a hospital-based, public, pain management unit to see if it increased people’s understanding of their pain and strategies that would support self-management. Coaches working in multidisciplinary teams can support people with information and strategies for their chronic pain, which can free up higher-trained health and medical professionals to care for people with greater complexity and ensure that timely access to support is received by matching need to level and type of support.

Autres résumés

Type: plain-language-summary (eng)
Globally, chronic pain affects more than 30% of people worldwide and is the leading cause of disability and healthcare use. Access to available, effective, and individualised programs is unattainable . People living in regional, rural and remote areas are disproportionately affected due to scarcity of services and qualified, multidisciplinary health and medical professionals. Scalable solutions are needed to increase access to effective, evidence-based care options and reduce inequities for people with chronic pain. Caring and supporting people with chronic pain requires effective, multifaceted bio-psychosocial approaches that are tailored to individual needs. Using ‘coaches’, a manualised Guided Self-Help (GSH) program was integrated within a multidisciplinary tertiary pain unit in a public hospital in Australia, which showed promising solutions to increasing access and availability of timely, cost-effective supports that can be delivered via mobile devices. This pilot study explored the effectiveness of offering a GSH program to people with chronic pain integrated into a hospital-based, public, pain management unit to see if it increased people’s understanding of their pain and strategies that would support self-management. Coaches working in multidisciplinary teams can support people with information and strategies for their chronic pain, which can free up higher-trained health and medical professionals to care for people with greater complexity and ensure that timely access to support is received by matching need to level and type of support.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36595182
doi: 10.1007/s40122-022-00464-z
pii: 10.1007/s40122-022-00464-z
pmc: PMC10036713
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

449-460

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s).

Références

Australian Institute of Health and Wellbeing, retrieved 10th May 2021. https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/chronicdisease/chronicpaininaustralia/contents/summary .
Savvakis M, Kolokouras. Quality of life and chronic pain: coping practices and experiences of patients with musculoskeletal diseases. Int J Caring Sci. 2019;12(3):1423–9.
Mills SEE, Nicolson KP, Smith BH. Chronic pain: a review of its epidemiology and associated factors in population-based studies. Br J Anaesthesiol. 2019;123(2):273–83.
doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.03.023
Karran E, Grant A, Mosely L. Low back pain and the social determinants of health: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. Pain. 2020;161(10):1097.
Australian Pain Society (2010) Waiting in Pain (Report). Pain Australia. https://www.painaustralia.org.au/
Sturgeon JA. Psychological therapies for the management of chronic pain. Psychol Res Behavior Management. 2014;10(7):115–24.
doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S44762
Moseley GL, Butler DS. Fifteen years of explaining pain: the past, present, and future. Journal of Pain. 2015;16(9):807–13.
doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.05.005 pubmed: 26051220
Hogg MN, Gibson S, Helou A, DeGabriele J, Farrell MJ. Waiting in pain: a systematic investigation into the provision of persistent pain services in Australia. Med J Aust. 2012;196(6):386–90.
doi: 10.5694/mja12.10140 pubmed: 22471539
Hogg MN, Kavanagh A, Farrell MJ, Burke ALJ. Waiting in pain II: an updated review of the provision of persistent pain services in Australia. Pain Med. 2021;22(6):1367–75.
doi: 10.1093/pm/pnaa374 pubmed: 33106875
World Health Organisation. Task shifting rational redistribution of tasks among health workforce teams: global recommendations and guidelines. World Health Organisation; 2008.
Orkin AM, Rao S, Venugopal J, et al. Conceptual framework for taskshifting and tasksharing: an international Delphi study. Hum Resour Health. 2021;19:61.
doi: 10.1186/s12960-021-00605-z pubmed: 33941191 pmcid: 8091141
Fairburn CG, Patel V. The impact of digital technology on psychological treatments and their dissemination. Behav Res Ther. 2017;88:19–25.
doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2016.08.012 pubmed: 28110672 pmcid: 5214969
Kazdin AE. Addressing the treatment gap: a key challenge for extending evidence-based psychosocial interventions. Behav Res Ther. 2017;88:7–18.
doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2016.06.004 pubmed: 28110678
Baigent M, Smith D, Battersby M, Lawn S, Redpath P, McCoy A. The Australian version of IAPT: clinical outcomes of the multi-site cohort study of NewAccess. J Ment Health. 2020;6(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2020.1760224 .
doi: 10.1080/09638237.2020.1760224
Clark DM. Realizing the mass public benefit of evidence-based psychological therapies: the IAPT program. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2018;14:159–83.
doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050817-084833 pubmed: 29350997 pmcid: 5942544
KallandKnapstad M, Goplen F, Skouen JS, Ask T, Nordahl SHG. Symptom severity and quality of life in patients with concurrent neck pain and dizziness. Disability Rehabil. 2020;42(19):2743–6.
doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1571640
Lawn S, Huang N, Zabeen S, Smith D, Battersby M, Redpath P, Glover F, Venning A, Cameron J, Fairweather-Schmidt K. Outcomes of telephone-delivered low-intensity cognitive behaviour therapy (LiCBT) to community dwelling Australians with a recent hospital admission due to depression or anxiety: MindStep™. BMC Psychiatry. 2019;19(1):2.
doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1987-1 pubmed: 30606169 pmcid: 6319009
Venning A, Oswald T, Barnes M, Glover F, Lawn S, Azadi L, Tepper N, Redpath P. It’s what’s under the hood that counts: comparing therapeutic outcomes when using Australian vs. UK-produced clinical materials in an Australian mental health program. Aust Health Rev. 2020;45(5):606–12.
doi: 10.1071/AH20307
The National Strategic Action Plan for Pain Management (2019). Pain Australia. Australian Department of Health. https://www.painaustralia.org.au/static/uploads/files/national-action-plan-final-02-07-2019-wfpnnlamkiqw.pdf
Redpath P, Venning A, Oswald T, Wall C. Rethinking pain. Flinders University; 2017.
Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J General Intern Med. 2001;16(9):606–13.
doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x
Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Löwe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(10):1092–7.
doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092 pubmed: 16717171
Cleeland CS, Ryan KM. Pain assessment: global use of the brief pain inventory. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 1994;23(2):129–38.
pubmed: 8080219
Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Farrar JT, Haythornthwaite JA, Jensen MP, Katz NP, Kerns RD, Stucki G, Allen RR, Bellamy N, Carr DB, Chandler J, Cowan P, Dionne R, Galer BS, Hertz S, Jadad AR, Kramer LD, Manning DC, Martin S, McCormick CG, McDermott MP, McGrath P, Quessy S, Rappaport BA, Robbins W, Robinson JP, Rothman M, Royal MA, Simon L, Stauffer JW, Stein W, Tollett J, Wernicke J, Witter J. IMMPACT. Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain. 2005;113(1–2):9–19.
doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2004.09.012 pubmed: 15621359
Kean J, Monahan P, Kroenke K, Wu J, Yu Z, Stump T, Krebs EE. Comparative responsiveness of the PROMIS pain interference short forms, brief pain inventory, PEG, and SF-36 bodily pain subscale. Med Care. 2016;54(4):414.
doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000497 pubmed: 26807536 pmcid: 4792763
Sullivan MJL, Bishop SR, Pivik J. The pain catastrophizing scale: development and validation. Am Psychol Assoc Inc. 1995;7(4):524–32.
Osman A, Barrios FX, Gutierrez PM, Kopper BA, Merrifield T, Grittmann L. The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: further psychometric evaluation with adult samples. J Behav Med. 2000;23(4):351–65.
doi: 10.1023/A:1005548801037 pubmed: 10984864
Van Damme S, Crombez G, Bijttebier P, Goubert L, Van Houdenhove B. A confirmatory factor analysis of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale: invariant factor structure across clinical and non-clinical populations. Pain. 2002;96(3):319–24.
doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00463-8 pubmed: 11973004
IBM Corp. Released 2016. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 24.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp. 2016.
Kistin C, Silverstein M. Pilot studies: a critical but potentially misused component of interventional research. JAMA. 2015;314(15):1561–2.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.10962 pubmed: 26501530 pmcid: 4917389
Lancaster GA, Dodd S, Williamson PR. Design and analysis of pilot studies: recommendations for good practice. J Eval Clin Pract. 2004;10(2):307–12.
doi: 10.1111/j..2002.384.doc.x pubmed: 15189396
Australian Health Services Research Institute. Patient outcomes in pain management: Flinders Medical Centre, Pain Management Unit. 2019 annual report 1 January to 31 December 2019. 2020.
Wilkinson M, Venning A, Redpath P, Ly M, Brown S, Battersby M. Can low intensity cognitive behavioural therapy for non-cardiac chest pain presentations to an emergency department be efficacious? A pilot study. Aust Psychol Soc. 2009;54:494–501.
doi: 10.1111/ap.12424
Turk DC, Dworkin RH, Allen RR, Bellamy N, Brandenburg N, Carr DB, Cleeland C, Dionne R, Farrar JT, Galer BS, Hewitt DJ, Jadad AR, Katz NP, Kramer LD, Manning DC, McCormick CG, McDermott MP, McGrath P, Quessy S, Rappaport BA, Robinson JP, Royal MA, Simon L, Stauffer JW, Stein W, Tollett J, Witter J. Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. Pain. 2003;106(3):337–45.
doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2003.08.001 pubmed: 14659516
Coulter A, Entwistle VA, Eccles A, Ryan S, Shepperd S and Perera R. Personalised care planning for adults with chronic or long‐term health conditions Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015. Iss. 3. Art. No: CD010523. Modified Brief Pain Inventory, reproduced with acknowledgement of the Pain Research Group, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Centre, USA.

Auteurs

Paula Redpath (P)

Discipline of Behavioural Health, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. paula.redpath@flinders.edu.au.

Amelia Searle (A)

Pain Management Unit, Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, SA Health, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Cindy Wall (C)

College of Health and Human Sciences, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.

Anthony Venning (A)

Discipline of Behavioural Health, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Tassia Oswald (T)

Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, Kings College London, London, UK.

Fiona Glover (F)

Discipline of Behavioural Health, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Peter Herriot (P)

Pain Management Unit, Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, SA Health, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Classifications MeSH