Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate and Prostate-specific Membrane Positron Emission Tomography Prior to Prostate Biopsy (MP4 Study).

Magnetic resonance imaging Positron emission tomography Prostate biopsy Prostate cancer Prostate-specific membrane antigen

Journal

European urology open science
ISSN: 2666-1683
Titre abrégé: Eur Urol Open Sci
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101771568

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jan 2023
Historique:
accepted: 23 11 2022
entrez: 5 1 2023
pubmed: 6 1 2023
medline: 6 1 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computerised tomography (PET/CT) is increasingly being utilised in the diagnostic pathway for prostate cancer (PCa). Recent publications have suggested that this might help identify those who can avoid biopsy. The primary objective of this study was to determine whether PET magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) fusion could negate the need to biopsy prior to prostatectomy in a selected population of men. Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) for PCa is our standard of care prior to prostate biopsy. Biopsy-naïve men with one or more Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 4 or 5 lesions ≥10 mm on mpMRI were invited to undergo PSMA PET/CT prior to biopsy. Following ethics approval, 60 men were recruited between September 2020 and March 2021. The key exclusion criteria included a previous history of PCa and previous prostate surgery or biopsy. A positive PET MRI fusion scan was defined as "consistent with" as per the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center lexicon of certainty, and concordance with biopsy results was analysed. Clinically significant PCa (csPCa) was defined as grade group (GG) ≥2 on pathology. A chi-square analysis was performed with statistical significance defined at A total of 71 mpMRI lesions were positive on 61 (86%) PET MRI fusion scans. Fifty-nine of 61 lesions biopsied confirmed csPCa in 54 (92%). Of five of 59 lesions for which either biopsy was negative or low-grade cancer was found, three had rebiopsy of which two were confirmed to have csPCa corroborating with PET MRI fusion and one was reconfirmed to have GG1 only. For the remaining two, both had another lesion elsewhere in the gland confirming csPCa, and hence rebiopsy was not performed. Ultimately, 56 of 59 (95%) lesions with a positive PET MRI fusion scan were confirmed to have csPCa. All GG ≥3 cancers had a positive PET MRI fusion scan. This prospective study of PET MRI fusion assessment of men with PI-RADS 4 or 5 lesion ≥10 mm on mpMRI confirms that the majority of men (95%) with a positive PET MRI fusion scan will have csPCa. This supports recently published retrospective data suggesting that selected men might avoid prostate biopsy prior to radical prostatectomy. In this research, we have confirmed that prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computerised tomography in combination with magnetic resonance imaging could have an important role in enabling a diagnosis of prostate cancer. Using the combination of these scans, we could confidently predict the presence of aggressive prostate cancer in some men for which treatment is warranted. This means that there are some men who could possibility proceed directly to having prostate cancer surgery without the need for a confirmatory prostate biopsy.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computerised tomography (PET/CT) is increasingly being utilised in the diagnostic pathway for prostate cancer (PCa). Recent publications have suggested that this might help identify those who can avoid biopsy.
Objective UNASSIGNED
The primary objective of this study was to determine whether PET magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) fusion could negate the need to biopsy prior to prostatectomy in a selected population of men.
Design setting and participant UNASSIGNED
Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) for PCa is our standard of care prior to prostate biopsy. Biopsy-naïve men with one or more Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 4 or 5 lesions ≥10 mm on mpMRI were invited to undergo PSMA PET/CT prior to biopsy. Following ethics approval, 60 men were recruited between September 2020 and March 2021. The key exclusion criteria included a previous history of PCa and previous prostate surgery or biopsy.
Outcome measurements and statistical analysis UNASSIGNED
A positive PET MRI fusion scan was defined as "consistent with" as per the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center lexicon of certainty, and concordance with biopsy results was analysed. Clinically significant PCa (csPCa) was defined as grade group (GG) ≥2 on pathology. A chi-square analysis was performed with statistical significance defined at
Results and limitations UNASSIGNED
A total of 71 mpMRI lesions were positive on 61 (86%) PET MRI fusion scans. Fifty-nine of 61 lesions biopsied confirmed csPCa in 54 (92%). Of five of 59 lesions for which either biopsy was negative or low-grade cancer was found, three had rebiopsy of which two were confirmed to have csPCa corroborating with PET MRI fusion and one was reconfirmed to have GG1 only. For the remaining two, both had another lesion elsewhere in the gland confirming csPCa, and hence rebiopsy was not performed. Ultimately, 56 of 59 (95%) lesions with a positive PET MRI fusion scan were confirmed to have csPCa. All GG ≥3 cancers had a positive PET MRI fusion scan.
Conclusions UNASSIGNED
This prospective study of PET MRI fusion assessment of men with PI-RADS 4 or 5 lesion ≥10 mm on mpMRI confirms that the majority of men (95%) with a positive PET MRI fusion scan will have csPCa. This supports recently published retrospective data suggesting that selected men might avoid prostate biopsy prior to radical prostatectomy.
Patient summary UNASSIGNED
In this research, we have confirmed that prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computerised tomography in combination with magnetic resonance imaging could have an important role in enabling a diagnosis of prostate cancer. Using the combination of these scans, we could confidently predict the presence of aggressive prostate cancer in some men for which treatment is warranted. This means that there are some men who could possibility proceed directly to having prostate cancer surgery without the need for a confirmatory prostate biopsy.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36601041
doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.11.012
pii: S2666-1683(22)02699-4
pmc: PMC9806699
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

119-125

Informations de copyright

© 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Association of Urology.

Références

Lancet. 2020 Apr 11;395(10231):1208-1216
pubmed: 32209449
Eur Urol Focus. 2020 Mar 15;6(2):249-254
pubmed: 31054811
Radiology. 2020 Jul;296(1):76-84
pubmed: 32315265
BJU Int. 2019 Nov;124 Suppl 1:42-49
pubmed: 31287613
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Dec;203(6):W651-7
pubmed: 25415731
Eur Urol. 2022 Aug;82(2):156-160
pubmed: 34887117
BJU Int. 2020 Apr;125(4):515-524
pubmed: 31957122
BJU Int. 2013 Sep;112(5):585-93
pubmed: 23551500
Eur Urol. 2021 Dec;80(6):682-689
pubmed: 34465492
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021 May;48(5):1626-1638
pubmed: 33604691
Front Oncol. 2022 Feb 03;12:800904
pubmed: 35186741
Mol Imaging Biol. 2015 Aug;17(4):575-84
pubmed: 26013479
Radiographics. 2021 Mar-Apr;41(2):E64-E65
pubmed: 33646904
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2018 Nov;21(4):473-487
pubmed: 30104656
Future Oncol. 2021 Jun;17(17):2225-2241
pubmed: 33724868
Urol Oncol. 2022 Mar;40(3):104.e17-104.e21
pubmed: 34911650
Prostate Int. 2021 Jun;9(2):107-112
pubmed: 34386454

Auteurs

Henry H Woo (HH)

College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
SAN Prostate Centre of Excellence, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Department of Urology, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Hadia Khanani (H)

SAN Prostate Centre of Excellence, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Nadine J Thompson (NJ)

SAN Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Brian J Sorensen (BJ)

SAN Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Sris Baskaranathan (S)

SAN Prostate Centre of Excellence, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Department of Urology, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Philip Bergersen (P)

SAN Prostate Centre of Excellence, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Department of Urology, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Venu Chalasani (V)

SAN Prostate Centre of Excellence, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Department of Urology, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Thomas Dean (T)

SAN Prostate Centre of Excellence, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Department of Urology, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Max Dias (M)

SAN Prostate Centre of Excellence, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Department of Urology, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

James Symons (J)

College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
SAN Prostate Centre of Excellence, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Department of Urology, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Michael Wines (M)

SAN Prostate Centre of Excellence, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Department of Urology, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Anika Jain (A)

SAN Prostate Centre of Excellence, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Anthony-Joe Nassour (AJ)

SAN Prostate Centre of Excellence, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Lisa C Tarlinton (LC)

SAN Prostate Centre of Excellence, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
SAN Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Classifications MeSH