Women's Perception of Transgastric and Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) - Impact of Medical Education, Stage of Life and Cross-Cultural Aspects.
Arab female
natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery
perception
Journal
International journal of women's health
ISSN: 1179-1411
Titre abrégé: Int J Womens Health
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101531698
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
25
07
2022
accepted:
17
11
2022
entrez:
5
1
2023
pubmed:
6
1
2023
medline:
6
1
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Despite that NOTES produces at least matchable clinical long-term results when compared to laparoscopy, still a restraint within the medical community and among patients is evident. Consequently, it might be meaningful to evaluate factors of patient's NOTES perception to promote its acceptance. NOTES is still quite novel and questionnaires regarding its perception by the public is still lacking even so in the Middle East. Aim of our survey is to investigate the viewpoint of female healthcare staff on NOTES. A total of 350 questionnaires along with written information about Minimally Invasive Surgery and NOTES were distributed among the female staff in a Tertiary-care Hospital in Abu Dhabi, 257 were returned completely anonymously and voluntarily and entered into a database with a response rate of 73%. We surveyed factors like religion, medical background, age as well as history of previous laparoscopy, endoscopy, birth and other aspects that may impact a woman's perception of both transgastric and transvaginal NOTES for cholecystectomy and ovariectomy, respectively. Univariate analyses revealed the majority of Muslim women to be more receptive to NOTES as a choice of surgical technique for cholecystectomy and for ovariectomy, respectively, when compared to Christians and Hindus. However, when compared to Muslims, Christian and Hindu groups had a larger share of medical professions. Women with a medical background would opt significantly less for NOTES. Among younger women, NOTES cholecystectomy was refused due to anxiety concerning future pregnancies and sexual dysfunction. Multinomial logistic regression analysis determined medical background and with independent predictive value for the overall choice of interventional technique (p<0.001). Marital status played a significant role only in the comparison of laparoscopy vs transgastric NOTES when performing cholecystectomy and ovariectomy (p<0.01). In this first study emanating from the Middle East, medical education and partly life stage rather than cross-cultural differences seem to influence NOTES perception in women.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36601385
doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S382457
pii: 382457
pmc: PMC9807120
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1881-1895Informations de copyright
© 2022 Benhidjeb et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The author declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Références
Dig Dis Sci. 2011 Aug;56(8):2415-22
pubmed: 21706205
Int Braz J Urol. 2016 Jan-Feb;42(1):78-82
pubmed: 27136470
Br J Surg. 2017 Jul;104(8):977-989
pubmed: 28608958
Yonsei Med J. 2012 Sep;53(5):960-7
pubmed: 22869479
Gastrointest Endosc. 2004 Jul;60(1):114-7
pubmed: 15229442
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Aug;207(2):112.e1-6
pubmed: 22704765
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021 Sep;406(6):2045-2052
pubmed: 33788009
World J Urol. 2015 Dec;33(12):2009-14
pubmed: 25944678
Surg Endosc. 2021 Dec;35(12):6865-6872
pubmed: 33398552
Surg Endosc. 2010 Oct;24(10):2424-31
pubmed: 20224999
Surg Endosc. 2013 Aug;27(8):2807-12
pubmed: 23392983
Chirurg. 2015 Jun;86(6):577-86
pubmed: 24994591
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2021 Apr;41(3):434-438
pubmed: 32530343
Chirurg. 2015 Jun;86(6):587-94
pubmed: 25213855
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2013 Apr;398(4):571-9
pubmed: 23456357
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2014 Aug;399(6):717-24
pubmed: 24952726
Surg Endosc. 2012 Dec;26(12):3597-604
pubmed: 22717796
Dig Endosc. 2014 May;26(3):458-66
pubmed: 24199741
Surg Innov. 2016 Apr;23(2):201-11
pubmed: 26234564
Br J Surg. 2015 Jan;102(2):e73-92
pubmed: 25627137
Surg Endosc. 2012 Dec;26(12):3435-41
pubmed: 22648123
World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Apr 21;18(15):1800-5
pubmed: 22553405
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2022 Jun;31(5):803-809
pubmed: 35073493
Surg Endosc. 2009 Aug;23(8):1770-4
pubmed: 19057953
Dig Dis Sci. 2013 Aug;58(8):2167-76
pubmed: 23516034
Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Feb;87(2):509-516
pubmed: 28993135
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2011 Mar;21(2):101-6
pubmed: 21401408
Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2019 Jan;28(1):101-113
pubmed: 30414675
Chirurg. 2011 Aug;82(8):707-13
pubmed: 21431963
Surg Endosc. 2015 Apr;29(4):774-80
pubmed: 25159629
Chirurg. 2007 Jun;78(6):537-42
pubmed: 17492263