Massed vs Intensive Outpatient Prolonged Exposure for Combat-Related Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Journal
JAMA network open
ISSN: 2574-3805
Titre abrégé: JAMA Netw Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101729235
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 01 2023
03 01 2023
Historique:
entrez:
5
1
2023
pubmed:
6
1
2023
medline:
10
1
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Improved, efficient, and acceptable treatments are needed for combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). To determine the efficacy of 2 compressed prolonged exposure (PE) therapy outpatient treatments for combat-related PTSD. This randomized clinical trial was conducted among military personnel and veterans at 4 sites in Texas from 2017 to 2019. Assessors were blinded to conditions. Data were analyzed from November 2020 to October 2022. The interventions were massed-PE, which included 15 therapy sessions of 90 minutes each over 3 weeks, vs intensive outpatient program PE (IOP-PE), which included 15 full-day therapy sessions over 3 weeks with 8 treatment augmentations. The IOP-PE intervention was hypothesized to be superior to massed-PE. Coprimary outcomes included the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fifth Edition) (DSM-5) (CAPS-5) and the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) administered at baseline and posttreatment follow-ups. Measures ranged from 0 to 80, with higher scores indicating greater severity. Diagnostic remission and reliable change were secondary outcomes. Among 319 military personnel and veterans screened, 234 were randomized (mean [SD] age, 39.20 [7.72] years; 182 [78%] male participants), with 117 participants randomized to IOP-PE and 117 participants randomized to massed-PE. A total of 61 participants (26%) were African American, 58 participants (25%) were Hispanic, and 102 participants (44%) were White; 151 participants (65%) were married. Linear mixed-effects models found that CAPS-5 scores decreased in both treatment groups at the 1-month follow-up (IOP-PE: mean difference, -13.85 [95% CI, -16.47 to -11.23]; P < .001; massed-PE: mean difference, -14.13 [95% CI, -16.63 to -11.62]; P < .001). CAPS-5 change scores differed from 1- to 6-month follow-ups (mean difference, 4.44 [95% CI, 0.89 to 8.01]; P = .02). PTSD symptoms increased in massed-PE participants during follow-up (mean difference, 3.21 [95% CI, 0.65 to 5.77]; P = .01), whereas IOP-PE participants maintained treatment gains (mean difference, 1.23 [95% CI, -3.72 to 1.27]; P = .33). PCL-5 scores decreased in both groups from baseline to 1-month follow-up (IOP-PE: mean difference, -21.81 [95% CI, -25.57 to -18.04]; P < .001; massed-PE: mean difference, -19.96 [95% CI, -23.56 to -16.35]; P < .001) and were maintained at 6 months (IOP-PE: mean change, -0.21 [95% CI, -3.47 to 3.06]; P = .90; massed-PE: mean change, 3.02 [95% CI, -0.36 to 6.40]; P = .08). Both groups had notable PTSD diagnostic remission at posttreatment (IOP-PE: 48% [95% CI, 36% to 61%] of participants; massed-PE: 62% [95% CI, 51% to 73%] of participants), which was maintained at 6 months (IOP-PE: 53% [95% CI, 40% to 66%] of participants; massed-PE: 52% [95% CI, 38% to 66%] of participants). Most participants demonstrated reliable change on the CAPS-5 (61% [95% CI, 52% to 69%] of participants) and the PCL-5 (74% [95% CI, 66% to 81%] of participants) at the 1-month follow-up. These findings suggest that PE can be adapted into compressed treatment formats that effectively reduce PTSD symptoms. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03529435.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36602803
pii: 2800086
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.49422
pmc: PMC9856757
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03529435']
Types de publication
Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e2249422Références
Med Care. 2017 Nov;55(11):965-969
pubmed: 28930889
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Jul 27;18(1):242
pubmed: 30053860
Psychol Trauma. 2017 Aug;9(Suppl 1):19-24
pubmed: 27929311
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1991 Feb;59(1):12-9
pubmed: 2002127
Am J Psychiatry. 2014 Mar;171(3):294-304
pubmed: 24480899
Contemp Clin Trials. 2013 Jan;34(1):152-4
pubmed: 23117077
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1991 Oct;59(5):715-23
pubmed: 1955605
J Trauma Stress. 2015 Dec;28(6):489-98
pubmed: 26606250
JAMA. 2022 Apr 26;327(16):1549-1550
pubmed: 35363251
Psychol Serv. 2018 Nov;15(4):529-535
pubmed: 29265844
JAMA. 2018 Jan 23;319(4):354-364
pubmed: 29362795
Behav Modif. 2012 Nov;36(6):787-807
pubmed: 22679239
Contemp Clin Trials. 2018 Sep;72:126-136
pubmed: 30055335
Psychol Trauma. 2019 Nov;11(8):877-885
pubmed: 31070441
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2014 May 19;10:887-95
pubmed: 24899807
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2021 May 14;12(1):1917878
pubmed: 34025928
JAMA. 2015 Aug 4;314(5):489-500
pubmed: 26241600
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2018 Mar/Apr;33(2):E30-E40
pubmed: 28422901
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008 Mar;23(2):70-83
pubmed: 18301121
Mil Med. 2022 Aug 25;187(9-10):248-251
pubmed: 34850070
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2012;49(5):649-65
pubmed: 23015577
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2019 Jan;87(1):67-78
pubmed: 30431299
Psychol Serv. 2020 May;17(2):187-194
pubmed: 30299150
Depress Anxiety. 2001;13(3):132-56
pubmed: 11387733
J Clin Psychol. 2018 Dec;74(12):2070-2081
pubmed: 29917224
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2010 Jan;44(1):4-19
pubmed: 20073563
Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 Nov;110:106583
pubmed: 34600107
Psychol Assess. 2018 Mar;30(3):383-395
pubmed: 28493729
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1996 Jun;11 Suppl 3:89-95
pubmed: 8923116
J Psychiatr Res. 2021 Sep;141:226-232
pubmed: 34246978
Psychol Serv. 2021 Nov;18(4):606-618
pubmed: 32658509
Psychol Assess. 2016 Nov;28(11):1392-1403
pubmed: 26751087
Psychiatry Res. 2009 Jan 30;165(1-2):163-74
pubmed: 19042030
Mil Med. 2016 Jun;181(6):537-45
pubmed: 27244063
Psychol Assess. 2016 Nov;28(11):1379-1391
pubmed: 26653052
Psychol Med. 2019 Sep;49(12):1980-1989
pubmed: 30220261
Mil Med. 2021 Jan 25;186(Suppl 1):190-197
pubmed: 33499524