Effect of Second-Stage Pushing Timing on Postpartum Pelvic Floor Morbidity: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Journal
Obstetrics and gynecology
ISSN: 1873-233X
Titre abrégé: Obstet Gynecol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0401101
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 02 2023
01 02 2023
Historique:
received:
08
08
2022
accepted:
07
10
2022
pubmed:
6
1
2023
medline:
24
1
2023
entrez:
5
1
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To assess whether immediate or delayed pushing in the second-stage results in higher risk of pelvic floor morbidity. This study was a planned secondary aim of a multicenter randomized clinical trial that included nulliparous patients at 37 weeks of gestation or greater in labor with neuraxial analgesia. Participants were randomized in the second stage to initiate pushing immediately or wait 60 minutes before pushing. Participants had pelvic floor assessments at 1-5 days postpartum, 6 weeks postpartum, and 6 months postpartum. Rates of perineal lacerations, pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) measures, and scores on validated symptom-specific distress and quality-of-life questionnaires (PFDI-20 [Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory], PFIQ [Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire], FISI [Fecal Incontinence Severity Index], and MMHQ [Modified Manchester Health Questionnaire]) were compared. It was estimated that 630 participants would provide more than 80% power to detect a 40% difference in second-degree or greater perineal lacerations and approximately 80% power to detect a 40% difference in stage 2 or greater pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Among 2,414 participants in the primary trial conducted between May 19, 2014, and December 16, 2017, 941 (39%) had pelvic floor assessments: 452 immediate pushing and 489 delayed pushing. The mean age was 24.8 years, and 93.4% had vaginal delivery. There were no significant differences in perineal lacerations at delivery and POP at 6 weeks and 6 months postpartum. Changes from baseline in total and subscale scores for the PFDI-20, the PFIQ, and the MMHQ were not significantly different at 6 weeks postpartum and 6 months postpartum. The change in FISI score was higher in the immediate pushing group at 6 months (2.9±5.7 vs 2.0±4.5, difference 0.9, P =.01), but less than the minimum important difference of 4. Among nulliparous patients in the second stage with neuraxial analgesia, immediate pushing, compared with delayed pushing, did not increase perineal lacerations, POP-Q measures, or patient-reported pelvic floor symptoms at 6 weeks and 6 months postpartum. ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT02137200.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36603202
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005031
pii: 00006250-202302000-00004
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02137200']
Types de publication
Randomized Controlled Trial
Multicenter Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
245-252Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Financial Disclosure Methodius G. Tuuli reports that money was paid to his institution from the NIH and the Gates Foundation. Holly E. Richter reports the following: Renovia-research funding (SUI, FI); Up to Date-Royalties; NIA-research funding; NIDDK-research funding; NICHD-research funding; Obstet Gynecol & IUJ, travel reimbursement related to editor duties; Worldwide Fistula Fund, board; DSMB Bluewind; Symposia Medicus-CME speaker. The other authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest.
Références
Hallock JL, Handa VL. The epidemiology of pelvic floor disorders and childbirth: an update. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2016;43:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2015.10.008
doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2015.10.008
Blomquist JL, Munoz A, Carroll M, Handa VL. Association of delivery mode with pelvic floor disorders after childbirth. JAMA 2018;320:2438–47. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.18315
doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.18315
Memon HU, Handa VL. Vaginal childbirth and pelvic floor disorders. Womens Health (Lond) 2013;9:265–77. doi: 10.2217/whe.13.17
doi: 10.2217/whe.13.17
Handa VL, Blomquist JL, Knoepp LR, Hoskey KA, McDermott KC, Munoz A. Pelvic floor disorders 5-10 years after vaginal or cesarean childbirth. Obstet Gynecol 2011;118:777–84. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182267f2f
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182267f2f
Lemos A, Amorim MM, Dornelas de Andrade A, de Souza AI, Cabral Filho JE, Correia JB. Pushing/bearing down methods for the second stage of labour. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2017, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD009124. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2015.10.008
doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2015.10.008
Fitzpatrick M, Harkin R, McQuillan K, O'Brien C, O'Connell PR, O'Herlihy C. A randomised clinical trial comparing the effects of delayed versus immediate pushing with epidural analgesia on mode of delivery and faecal continence. BJOG 2002;109:1359–65. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2015.10.008
doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2015.10.008
Cahill AG, Srinivas SK, Tita ATN, Caughey AB, Richter HE, Gregory WT, et al. Effect of immediate vs delayed pushing on rates of spontaneous vaginal delivery among nulliparous women receiving neuraxial analgesia: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2018;320:1444–54. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.13986
doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.13986
Gregory WT, Cahill AG, Woolfolk C, Lowder JL, Caughey AB, Srinivas SK, et al. Impact of pushing timing on occult injury of levator ani: secondary analysis of a randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2022;226:718.e1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.02.020.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.02.020
Prevention and management of obstetric lacerations at vaginal delivery. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 198. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2018;132:e87–102. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002841
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002841
Diokno AC, Borodulin G. A new vaginal speculum for pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POPQ). Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2005;16:384–8. doi:10.1007/s00192-004-1271-4
doi: 10.1007/s00192-004-1271-4
Barber MD, Walters MD, Bump RC. Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7). Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;193:103–13. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2015.10.008
doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2015.10.008
Rockwood TH, Church JM, Fleshman JW, Kane RL, Mavrantonis C, Thorson AG, et al. Patient and surgeon ranking of the severity of symptoms associated with fecal incontinence: the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index. Dis Colon Rectum 1999;42:1525–32. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2015.10.008
doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2015.10.008
Kwon S, Visco AG, Fitzgerald MP, Ye W, Whitehead WE; Pelvic Floor Disorders Network. Validity and reliability of the Modified Manchester Health Questionnaire in assessing patients with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48:323–31. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2015.10.008
doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2015.10.008
Leeman L, Rogers R, Borders N, Teaf D, Qualls C. The effect of perineal lacerations on pelvic floor function and anatomy at 6 Months postpartum in a prospective cohort of nulliparous women. Birth 2016;43:293–302. doi: 10.1111/birt.12258
doi: 10.1111/birt.12258
Heilbrun ME, Nygaard IE, Lockhart ME, Richter HE, Brown MB, Kenton KS, et al. Correlation between levator ani muscle injuries on magnetic resonance imaging and fecal incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, and urinary incontinence in primiparous women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;202:488.e1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.01.002
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.01.002
Jelovsek JE, Chen Z, Markland AD, Brubaker L, Dyer KY, Meikle S, et al. Minimum important differences for scales assessing symptom severity and quality of life in patients with fecal incontinence. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 2014;20:342–8. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000078
doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000078
Gimovsky AC, Phillips JM, Amero M, Levine JO, Berghella V. Prolonged second stage effect on pelvic floor dysfunction: a follow up survey to a randomized controlled trial. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2022;35:5520–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2021.1887122
doi: 10.1080/14767058.2021.1887122
Jin X, Wu S, Huang J, Tong X, Li H, Chu L. Effect of prolonged second stage of labor on pelvic floor function: A prospective cohort study. Int Urogynecol J 2022;33:1633–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-022-05136-2
doi: 10.1007/s00192-022-05136-2
Pardo E, Rotem R, Glinter H, Erenberg M, Yahav L, Yohay Z, et al. Is there a correlation between pelvic floor dysfunction symptoms during pregnancy and the duration of the second stage of labor? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2022;35:4418–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2020.1850679
doi: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1850679