Guidelines for resident training in veterinary clinical pathology. IV: Laboratory quality management-Teaching domains, competencies, and suggested learning outcomes.
EPA
QA
QC
competency-based
entrustable professional activity
quality assessment
quality assurance
quality control
Journal
Veterinary clinical pathology
ISSN: 1939-165X
Titre abrégé: Vet Clin Pathol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9880575
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 Jan 2023
06 Jan 2023
Historique:
received:
13
10
2022
accepted:
18
10
2022
entrez:
7
1
2023
pubmed:
8
1
2023
medline:
8
1
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
The 2019 ASVCP Education Committee Forum for Discussion, presented at the annual ASVCP/ACVP meeting, identified a need to develop recommendations for teaching laboratory quality management principles in veterinary clinical pathology residency training programs. To present a competency-based framework for teaching laboratory quality management principles in veterinary clinical pathology residency training programs, including entrustable professional activities (EPAs), domains of competence, individual competencies, and learning outcomes. A joint subcommittee of the ASVCP Quality Assurance and Laboratory Standards (QALS) and Education Committees executed this project. A draft guideline version was reviewed by the ASVCP membership and shared with selected ACVP committees in early 2022, and a final version was voted upon by the full QALS and Education Committees in late 2022. Eleven domains of competence with relevant individual competencies were identified. In addition, suggested learning outcomes and resource lists were developed. Domains and individual competencies were mapped to six EPAs. This guideline presents a framework for teaching principles of laboratory quality management in veterinary clinical pathology residency training programs and was designed to be comprehensive yet practical. Guidance on pedagogical terms and possible routes of implementation are included. Recommendations herein aim to improve and support resident training but may require gradual implementation, as programs phase in necessary expertise and resources. Future directions include the development of learning milestones and assessments and consideration of how recommendations intersect with the American College of Veterinary Pathologists training program accreditation and certifying examination.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The 2019 ASVCP Education Committee Forum for Discussion, presented at the annual ASVCP/ACVP meeting, identified a need to develop recommendations for teaching laboratory quality management principles in veterinary clinical pathology residency training programs.
OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVE
To present a competency-based framework for teaching laboratory quality management principles in veterinary clinical pathology residency training programs, including entrustable professional activities (EPAs), domains of competence, individual competencies, and learning outcomes.
METHODS
METHODS
A joint subcommittee of the ASVCP Quality Assurance and Laboratory Standards (QALS) and Education Committees executed this project. A draft guideline version was reviewed by the ASVCP membership and shared with selected ACVP committees in early 2022, and a final version was voted upon by the full QALS and Education Committees in late 2022.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Eleven domains of competence with relevant individual competencies were identified. In addition, suggested learning outcomes and resource lists were developed. Domains and individual competencies were mapped to six EPAs.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This guideline presents a framework for teaching principles of laboratory quality management in veterinary clinical pathology residency training programs and was designed to be comprehensive yet practical. Guidance on pedagogical terms and possible routes of implementation are included. Recommendations herein aim to improve and support resident training but may require gradual implementation, as programs phase in necessary expertise and resources. Future directions include the development of learning milestones and assessments and consideration of how recommendations intersect with the American College of Veterinary Pathologists training program accreditation and certifying examination.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2023 American Society for Veterinary Clinical Pathology.
Références
Christopher MM, Stokol T, Sharkey L. Guidelines for resident training in veterinary clinical pathology. I Clinical Chemistry Vet Clin Pathol. 2003;32:202-208.
Sharkey L, Wellman M, Christopher MM. Guidelines for resident training in veterinary clinical pathology. II Hematology Vet Clin Pathol. 2006;35:382-387.
Kidney BA, Dial SM, Christopher MM. Guidelines for resident training in veterinary clinical pathology. III. Cytopathology and surgical pathology. Vet Clin Pathol. 2009;38:281-287.
North American Veterinary medical Education Consortium. Roadmap for Veterinary Medical Education in the 21st Century: Responsive, Collaborative, Flexible. NAVMEC report and recommendation. NAVMEC; 2011.
Newman AW, Moller CA, Evans SJM, Viall A, Baker K, Schaefer DMW. American Society for Veterinary Clinical Pathology - recommended clinical pathology competencies for graduating veterinarians. J Vet Med ed. 2021;e20210004. doi:10.3138/jvme-2021-0004
The Royal College of Pathologists. Curriculum for Specialty Training in Veterinary Clinical Pathology. RCP; 2018.
Competency Based Veterinary Education: CBVE framework. American Association of Veterinary Medical Colleges; 2018.
Competency Based Veterinary Education (CBVE). CBVE Terminology A Common Language for Developing the CBVE Shared Mental Model. American Association of Veterinary Medical Colleges; 2022. Available at https://cbve.org/terminology. Accessed March 2022.
McCloskey CB et al. Entrustable professional activities for pathology: recommendations from the college of American pathologists graduate medical education committee. Academic Pathol. 2017;4:1-9. doi:10.1177/23742895177142
Laposata M, Dighe A. “Pre-pre” and “post-post” analytical error: high incidence patient safety hazards involving the clinical laboratory. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2007;45:712-719. doi:10.1515/CCLM.2007.173
Plebani M, Laposata M, Lundberg GD. The brain-to-brain loop concept for laboratory testing 40 years after its introduction. Am J Clin Pathol. 2011;136:829-833. doi:10.1309/AJCPR28HWHSSDNON
Plebani M. Toward a new paradigm in laboratory medicine: the five rights. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2016;54:1881-1891. doi:10.1515/cclm-2016-0848
Westgard JO. Basic Method Validation and Verification Training in Analytical Quality Management for Healthcare Laboratories. 4th ed. Westgard QC; 2020:33.
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). EP15-A2 User Verification of Performance for Precision and Trueness; Approved Guideline. 2nd ed. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2005.