Patterns, predictors and prognostic relevance of high-grade hematotoxicity after temozolomide or temozolomide-lomustine in the CeTeG/NOA-09 trial.
Glioblastoma
Hematotoxicity
Lomustine
MGMT
Temozolomide
Journal
Journal of neuro-oncology
ISSN: 1573-7373
Titre abrégé: J Neurooncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8309335
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2023
Jan 2023
Historique:
received:
09
11
2022
accepted:
29
11
2022
pubmed:
8
1
2023
medline:
2
2
2023
entrez:
7
1
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In the randomized phase III trial CeTeG/NOA-09, temozolomide (TMZ)/lomustine (CCNU) combination therapy was superior to TMZ in newly diagnosed MGMT methylated glioblastoma, albeit reporting more frequent hematotoxicity. Here, we analyze high grade hematotoxicity and its prognostic relevance in the trial population. Descriptive and comparative analysis of hematotoxicity adverse events ≥ grade 3 (HAE) according to the Common Terminology of Clinical Adverse Events, version 4.0 was performed. The association of HAE with survival was assessed in a landmark analysis. Logistic regression analysis was performed to predict HAE during the concomitant phase of chemotherapy. HAE occurred in 36.4% and 28.6% of patients under CCNU/TMZ and TMZ treatment, respectively. The median onset of the first HAE was during concomitant chemotherapy (i.e. first CCNU/TMZ course or daily TMZ therapy), and 42.9% of patients with HAE receiving further courses experienced repeat HAE. Median HAE duration was similar between treatment arms (CCNU/TMZ 11.5; TMZ 13 days). Chemotherapy was more often discontinued due to HAE in CCNU/TMZ than in TMZ (19.7 vs. 6.3%, p = 0.036). The occurrence of HAE was not associated with survival differences (p = 0.76). Regression analysis confirmed older age (OR 1.08) and female sex (OR 2.47), but not treatment arm, as predictors of HAE. Older age and female sex are associated with higher incidence of HAE. Although occurrence of HAE was not associated with shorter survival, reliable prediction of patients at risk might be beneficial to allow optimal management of therapy and allocation of supportive measures. NCT01149109.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36609807
doi: 10.1007/s11060-022-04203-4
pii: 10.1007/s11060-022-04203-4
pmc: PMC9886607
doi:
Substances chimiques
Temozolomide
YF1K15M17Y
Lomustine
7BRF0Z81KG
Dacarbazine
7GR28W0FJI
Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating
0
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01149109']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase III
Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
147-153Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Sep 10;36(26):2680-2683
pubmed: 30004815
Neuro Oncol. 2022 Sep 1;24(9):1533-1545
pubmed: 35312789
J Neurooncol. 2022 Feb;156(3):625-634
pubmed: 35037156
Am J Clin Oncol. 2015 Oct;38(5):514-9
pubmed: 24064758
J Nucl Cardiol. 2019 Apr;26(2):391-393
pubmed: 30719655
Lancet. 2019 Feb 16;393(10172):678-688
pubmed: 30782343
Neuro Oncol. 2009 Dec;11(6):825-32
pubmed: 19179423
Neurology. 2019 Nov 5;93(19):e1799-e1806
pubmed: 31586022
N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 10;352(10):987-96
pubmed: 15758009
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2013 Sep;115(9):1814-9
pubmed: 23764039
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Oct;20(10):1444-1453
pubmed: 31488360
Clin Infect Dis. 2011 Feb 15;52(4):e56-93
pubmed: 21258094
Biol Sex Differ. 2020 Jun 5;11(1):32
pubmed: 32503637
N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 10;352(10):997-1003
pubmed: 15758010
Neurology. 2022 May 17;98(20):e2073-e2083
pubmed: 35351796
Neuro Oncol. 2020 Aug 17;22(8):1073-1113
pubmed: 32328653
Int Rev Neurobiol. 2008;83:1-10
pubmed: 18929073
J Clin Oncol. 2002 Mar 1;20(5):1375-82
pubmed: 11870182
Intern Med J. 2014 Dec;44(12b):1350-63
pubmed: 25482745