A Deep Learning System for Automated Quality Evaluation of Optic Disc Photographs in Neuro-Ophthalmic Disorders.
artificial intelligence
deep learning
optic nerve head
papilledema
retinal image quality assessment
Journal
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2075-4418
Titre abrégé: Diagnostics (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101658402
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 01 2023
03 01 2023
Historique:
received:
05
12
2022
revised:
27
12
2022
accepted:
28
12
2022
entrez:
8
1
2023
pubmed:
9
1
2023
medline:
9
1
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The quality of ocular fundus photographs can affect the accuracy of the morphologic assessment of the optic nerve head (ONH), either by humans or by deep learning systems (DLS). In order to automatically identify ONH photographs of optimal quality, we have developed, trained, and tested a DLS, using an international, multicentre, multi-ethnic dataset of 5015 ocular fundus photographs from 31 centres in 20 countries participating to the Brain and Optic Nerve Study with Artificial Intelligence (BONSAI). The reference standard in image quality was established by three experts who independently classified photographs as of "good", "borderline", or "poor" quality. The DLS was trained on 4208 fundus photographs and tested on an independent external dataset of 807 photographs, using a multi-class model, evaluated with a one-vs-rest classification strategy. In the external-testing dataset, the DLS could identify with excellent performance "good" quality photographs (AUC = 0.93 (95% CI, 0.91-0.95), accuracy = 91.4% (95% CI, 90.0-92.9%), sensitivity = 93.8% (95% CI, 92.5-95.2%), specificity = 75.9% (95% CI, 69.7-82.1%) and "poor" quality photographs (AUC = 1.00 (95% CI, 0.99-1.00), accuracy = 99.1% (95% CI, 98.6-99.6%), sensitivity = 81.5% (95% CI, 70.6-93.8%), specificity = 99.7% (95% CI, 99.6-100.0%). "Borderline" quality images were also accurately classified (AUC = 0.90 (95% CI, 0.88-0.93), accuracy = 90.6% (95% CI, 89.1-92.2%), sensitivity = 65.4% (95% CI, 56.6-72.9%), specificity = 93.4% (95% CI, 92.1-94.8%). The overall accuracy to distinguish among the three classes was 90.6% (95% CI, 89.1-92.1%), suggesting that this DLS could select optimal quality fundus photographs in patients with neuro-ophthalmic and neurological disorders affecting the ONH.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36611452
pii: diagnostics13010160
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13010160
pmc: PMC9818957
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : SingHealth Duke-NUS Academic Medical Centre
ID : 05/FYP2019/P2/06-A60
Organisme : Singapore National Medical Research Council
ID : CIRG18Nov-0013
Investigateurs
Masoud Aghsaei Fard
(M)
Selvakumar Ambika
(S)
Eray Atalay
(E)
Tin Aung
(T)
Étienne Bénard-Séguin
(É)
Mukharram M. Bikbov
(MM)
Carmen K. M. Chan
(CKM)
Noel C. Y. Chan
(NCY)
John J. Chen
(JJ)
Carol Y. Cheung
(CY)
Christophe Chiquet
(C)
Catherine Clermont-Vignal
(C)
Fiona Costello
(F)
L J Maillette de Buy Wenniger
(LJ)
Pedro L. Fonseca
(PL)
Reuben Chao Ming Foo
(RCM)
Clare L. Fraser
(CL)
J. Alexander Fraser
(JA)
Fumio Takano
(F)
Philippe Gohier
(P)
Rabih Hage
(R)
Steffen Hamann
(S)
Jeong-Min Hwang
(JM)
Jost B. Jonas
(JB)
Neringa Jurkute
(N)
Richard Kho
(R)
Janvier Ngoy Kilangalanga
(JN)
Dong Hyun Kim
(DH)
Wolf Alexander Lagrèze
(WA)
Jing Liang Loo
(JL)
Luis J. Mejico
(LJ)
Jonathan A. Micieli
(JA)
Neil Miller
(N)
Makoto Nakamura
(M)
Ajay Patil
(A)
Axel Petzold
(A)
Marie-Bénédicte Rougier
(MB)
Nicolae Sanda
(N)
Shweta Singhal
(S)
Gabriele Thumann
(G)
Valérie Touitou
(V)
Sharon Lee Choon Tow
(SLC)
Thi Ha Chau Tran
(THC)
Caroline Vasseneix
(C)
Elisabeth Arnberg Wibroe
(EA)
Hee Kyung Yang
(HK)
Christine Wen Leng Yau
(CWL)
Patrick Yu-Wai-Man
(P)
Leonard B Milea
(LB)
Références
BMC Ophthalmol. 2019 Aug 9;19(1):178
pubmed: 31399077
Diabet Med. 2003 Jun;20(6):467-74
pubmed: 12786681
Med Image Anal. 2020 Apr;61:101654
pubmed: 32066065
Ophthalmology. 2018 Aug;125(8):1199-1206
pubmed: 29506863
Bioinformatics. 2019 Nov 1;35(21):4522-4524
pubmed: 30989173
Telemed J E Health. 2006 Apr;12(2):89-98
pubmed: 16620162
Br J Ophthalmol. 2005 Jul;89(7):891-6
pubmed: 15965173
J Neuroophthalmol. 2020 Dec;40(4):485-493
pubmed: 31609835
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006 Mar;47(3):1120-5
pubmed: 16505050
Ophthalmologica. 2017;238(1-2):89-99
pubmed: 28675903
N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 30;382(18):1687-1695
pubmed: 32286748
Clin Ophthalmol. 2020 Feb 13;14:419-429
pubmed: 32103888
IEEE Trans Image Process. 2018 Jan;27(1):206-219
pubmed: 29028191
Ophthalmology. 2012 Aug;119(8):1701-4
pubmed: 22484117
J Digit Imaging. 2018 Dec;31(6):869-878
pubmed: 29704086
Sci Rep. 2018 Nov 12;8(1):16685
pubmed: 30420630
Acta Ophthalmol. 2021 Dec;99(8):e1415-e1420
pubmed: 33724706
Telemed J E Health. 2005 Dec;11(6):668-74
pubmed: 16430386
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2016 Aug;2016:1304-1307
pubmed: 28268565
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2021 Sep 1;10(11):16
pubmed: 34524409
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2022 Apr;22(4):243-256
pubmed: 35320466
Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2021 May-Jun 01;10(3):282-288
pubmed: 34383719
Ann Neurol. 2020 Oct;88(4):785-795
pubmed: 32621348
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019 Dec 1;137(12):1353-1360
pubmed: 31513266
Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2022 Mar-Apr 01;11(2):111-125
pubmed: 35533331
Comput Biol Med. 2019 May;108:317-331
pubmed: 31028967
Comput Biol Med. 2018 Dec 1;103:64-70
pubmed: 30340214