A Holistic Approach to Identify and Classify COVID-19 from Chest Radiographs, ECG, and CT-Scan Images Using ShuffleNet Convolutional Neural Network.
COVID-19
CT scans
ECG Trace Images
ShuffleNet
chest radiographs
classification
convolutional neural networks
detection
medical imaging
Journal
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2075-4418
Titre abrégé: Diagnostics (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101658402
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 Jan 2023
03 Jan 2023
Historique:
received:
29
11
2022
revised:
21
12
2022
accepted:
28
12
2022
entrez:
8
1
2023
pubmed:
9
1
2023
medline:
9
1
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Early and precise COVID-19 identification and analysis are pivotal in reducing the spread of COVID-19. Medical imaging techniques, such as chest X-ray or chest radiographs, computed tomography (CT) scan, and electrocardiogram (ECG) trace images are the most widely known for early discovery and analysis of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Deep learning (DL) frameworks for identifying COVID-19 positive patients in the literature are limited to one data format, either ECG or chest radiograph images. Moreover, using several data types to recover abnormal patterns caused by COVID-19 could potentially provide more information and restrict the spread of the virus. This study presents an effective COVID-19 detection and classification approach using the Shufflenet CNN by employing three types of images, i.e., chest radiograph, CT-scan, and ECG-trace images. For this purpose, we performed extensive classification experiments with the proposed approach using each type of image. With the chest radiograph dataset, we performed three classification experiments at different levels of granularity, i.e., binary, three-class, and four-class classifications. In addition, we performed a binary classification experiment with the proposed approach by classifying CT-scan images into COVID-positive and normal. Finally, utilizing the ECG-trace images, we conducted three experiments at different levels of granularity, i.e., binary, three-class, and five-class classifications. We evaluated the proposed approach with the baseline COVID-19 Radiography Database, SARS-CoV-2 CT-scan, and ECG images dataset of cardiac and COVID-19 patients. The average accuracy of 99.98% for COVID-19 detection in the three-class classification scheme using chest radiographs, optimal accuracy of 100% for COVID-19 detection using CT scans, and average accuracy of 99.37% for five-class classification scheme using ECG trace images have proved the efficacy of our proposed method over the contemporary methods. The optimal accuracy of 100% for COVID-19 detection using CT scans and the accuracy gain of 1.54% (in the case of five-class classification using ECG trace images) from the previous approach, which utilized ECG images for the first time, has a major contribution to improving the COVID-19 prediction rate in early stages. Experimental findings demonstrate that the proposed framework outperforms contemporary models. For example, the proposed approach outperforms state-of-the-art DL approaches, such as Squeezenet, Alexnet, and Darknet19, by achieving the accuracy of 99.98 (proposed method), 98.29, 98.50, and 99.67, respectively.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36611454
pii: diagnostics13010162
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13010162
pmc: PMC9818310
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2020 Nov;196:105581
pubmed: 32534344
Expert Syst Appl. 2022 May 1;193:116377
pubmed: 35002099
Int J Oral Sci. 2020 Mar 3;12(1):9
pubmed: 32127517
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Jun 17;2022:6486570
pubmed: 35755757
Eur Radiol. 2021 Aug;31(8):6096-6104
pubmed: 33629156
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Aug 24;21(17):
pubmed: 34502591
Pattern Recognit. 2022 Feb;122:108255
pubmed: 34456369
Pattern Recognit. 2021 Dec;120:108135
pubmed: 34642504
Radiography (Lond). 2021 May;27(2):443-452
pubmed: 33168371
Comput Biol Med. 2020 Jun;121:103792
pubmed: 32568675
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Nov 04;9:1005920
pubmed: 36405585
Health Inf Sci Syst. 2022 Jan 19;10(1):1
pubmed: 35096384
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2022 May;218:106731
pubmed: 35286874
J Healthc Eng. 2022 Jan 25;2022:4130674
pubmed: 35178226
Comput Biol Med. 2022 May;144:105350
pubmed: 35305501
Nat Med. 2020 Aug;26(8):1224-1228
pubmed: 32427924
Neural Comput Appl. 2022 Jan 5;:1-15
pubmed: 35013650
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Oct 06;22(19):
pubmed: 36236674
J Med Biol Eng. 2020;40(3):462-469
pubmed: 32412551
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Feb 23;22(5):
pubmed: 35270898
Phys Eng Sci Med. 2020 Sep;43(3):915-925
pubmed: 32588200
Med Hypotheses. 2020 Jul;140:109761
pubmed: 32344309
Comput Biol Med. 2021 May;132:104319
pubmed: 33799220
Data Brief. 2021 Jan 18;34:106762
pubmed: 33521183