Egg Quality of Italian Local Chicken Breeds: II. Composition and Predictive Ability of VIS-Near-InfraRed Spectroscopy.

chemical composition hen infrared technology native breed quality

Journal

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
Titre abrégé: Animals (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101635614

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
25 Dec 2022
Historique:
received: 22 11 2022
revised: 16 12 2022
accepted: 20 12 2022
entrez: 8 1 2023
pubmed: 9 1 2023
medline: 9 1 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The aims of the present study were to characterize egg composition and develop VIS-Near-infrared spectroscopy (VIS-NIR) models for its predictions in Italian local chicken breeds, namely Padovana Camosciata, Padovana Dorata, Polverara Bianca, Polverara Nera, Pepoi, Ermellinata di Rovigo, Robusta Maculata and Robusta Lionata. Hens were reared in a single conservation center under the same environmental and management conditions. A total of 200 samples (25 samples per breed, two eggs/sample) were analyzed for the composition of albumen and yolk. Prediction models for these traits were developed on both fresh and freeze-dried samples. Eggs of Polverara Nera and Polverara Bianca differed from eggs of the other breeds (p < 0.05) in terms of the greatest moisture content (90.06 ± 1.23% and 89.57 ± 1.31%, respectively) and the lowest protein content (8.34 ± 1.27% and 8.81 ± 1.27%) in the albumen on wet basis. As regards the yolk, Robusta Maculata and Robusta Lionata differed (p < 0.05) from the other breeds, having lower protein content (15.62 ± 1.13% and 15.21 ± 0.63%, respectively) and greater lipid content (34.11 ± 1.12% and 35.30 ± 0.98%) on wet basis. Eggs of Pepoi had greater cholesterol content (1406.39 ± 82.34 mg/100 g) on wet basis compared with Padovana Camosciata, Polverara Bianca and Robusta Maculata (p < 0.05). Spectral data were collected in reflectance mode in the VIS-NIR range (400 to 2500 nm) using DS2500 (Foss, Hillerød, Denmark) on fresh and freeze-dried samples. Models were developed through partial least-squares regression on untreated and pre-treated spectra independently for yolk and albumen, and using several combinations of scattering corrections and mathematical treatments. The predictive ability of the models developed for each compound was evaluated through the coefficient of determination (R2cv), standard error of prediction (SEcv) and the ratio of performance to deviation (RPDcv) in cross-validation. Prediction models performed better for freeze-dried than fresh albumen and yolk. In particular, for the albumen the performance of models using freeze-dried eggs was excellent (R2cv ≥ 0.91), and for yolk it was suitable for the prediction of protein content and dry matter. Good performances of prediction were observed in yolk for dry matter (R2cv = 0.85), lipids and cholesterol (R2cv = 0.74). Overall, the results support the potential of infrared technology to predict the composition of eggs from local hens. Prediction models for proteins, dry matter and lipids of freeze-dried yolk could be used for labelling purposes to promote local breeds through the valorization of nutritional aspects.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36611687
pii: ani13010077
doi: 10.3390/ani13010077
pmc: PMC9817770
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Subventions

Organisme : Ministry of Agricultural, Food and Forestry Policies
ID : PSRN 2014-2020, sub-measure 10.2

Références

Meat Sci. 2001 Feb;57(2):133-7
pubmed: 22061355
Br Poult Sci. 2001 Jul;42(3):338-43
pubmed: 11469553
Poult Sci. 2013 Sep;92(9):2433-7
pubmed: 23960127
Poult Sci. 2018 Nov 1;97(11):4131-4136
pubmed: 30007345
Animals (Basel). 2021 Jan 20;11(2):
pubmed: 33498554
Poult Sci. 2012 Sep;91(9):2330-40
pubmed: 22912471
Animals (Basel). 2021 Apr 22;11(5):
pubmed: 33922160
Br Poult Sci. 2004 Dec;45(6):745-52
pubmed: 15697013
Anim Genet. 2006 Apr;37(2):106-12
pubmed: 16573524
Poult Sci. 2015 Oct;94(10):2566-75
pubmed: 26240390
Animals (Basel). 2020 Aug 18;10(8):
pubmed: 32824706
Poult Sci. 2020 Mar;99(3):1768-1776
pubmed: 32111337
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2015 Apr;407(10):2887-98
pubmed: 25662936
Poult Sci. 2010 Jun;89(6):1239-51
pubmed: 20460671
Br Poult Sci. 2010 Oct;51(5):629-34
pubmed: 21058066
Poult Sci. 2018 Jun 1;97(6):2239-2245
pubmed: 29562300
Foods. 2021 Sep 14;10(9):
pubmed: 34574289
J Dairy Sci. 2017 Aug;100(8):6084-6089
pubmed: 28624277

Auteurs

Filippo Cendron (F)

Department of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and Environment (DAFNAE), University of Padova, Viale dell'Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Italy.

Sarah Currò (S)

Department of Comparative Biomedicine and Food Science, University of Padova, Viale dell'Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Italy.

Chiara Rizzi (C)

Department of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and Environment (DAFNAE), University of Padova, Viale dell'Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Italy.

Mauro Penasa (M)

Department of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and Environment (DAFNAE), University of Padova, Viale dell'Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Italy.

Martino Cassandro (M)

Department of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and Environment (DAFNAE), University of Padova, Viale dell'Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Italy.
Federazione delle Associazioni Nazionali di Razza e Specie, Via XXIV Maggio 43, 00187 Roma, Italy.

Classifications MeSH