Egg Quality of Italian Local Chicken Breeds: I. Yield Performance and Physical Characteristics.

egg production egg quality hen local breed physical trait

Journal

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
Titre abrégé: Animals (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101635614

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
30 Dec 2022
Historique:
received: 22 11 2022
revised: 22 12 2022
accepted: 24 12 2022
entrez: 8 1 2023
pubmed: 9 1 2023
medline: 9 1 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The aim of this study was to compare yield performance (from 39 to 50 weeks of age) and egg physical characteristics (at 50 weeks of age) of eight autochthonous chicken breeds of the Veneto region (Italy). Four white eggshell breeds, namely Padovana Camosciata (PA-C, chamois plumage), Padovana Dorata (PA-G, golden plumage), Polverara Bianca (PO-W, white plumage), and Polverara Nera (PO-B, black plumage), and four tinted eggshell breeds, namely Pepoi (PP), Ermellinata di Rovigo (ER), Robusta Maculata (RM), and Robusta Lionata (RL) from a conservation centre were considered in the trial. Significant differences (p < 0.05) among breeds were observed for yield performance and egg quality. From 39 to 50 weeks of age, the hen-day egg production was higher in PA-C and RM than in RL, and PO-W and ER were intermediate; PA-G, PO-B, and PP were the lowest. The hen-day egg production changed according to the age of the hens. From 39 to 42 weeks of age, ER showed the highest hen-day egg production and PA-G the lowest; from 47 to 50 weeks, PA-C, PO-W, and RM were the highest and PP the lowest. The tinted eggshell breeds, with the exception of PP, had higher egg weights than white eggshell breeds. PP egg weight was similar to PO-B. As regards the tinted eggshell breeds, RM eggs had the highest eggshell a* and b*, and PP the lowest. PA-C had the most spherical eggs, and PO-B and ER had the most ovoid eggs. PO-W and RM had the highest eggshell thickness and ER had the lowest. The highest eggshell ratio was observed for PO-W and PO-B, and the lowest for ER. The yolk-to-albumen ratio was higher in the white eggshell breeds than in PP, ER, and RL. ER had the highest Haugh units and PA-G the lowest. PO-W, PO-B, PA-C, PA-G, and ER had the lowest egg inclusions, and RL and RM the highest. Tinted eggshell eggs differed from white eggshell eggs by having higher meat spots. Results indicated that the eggs produced by the eight local chicken breeds differed according to the laying rate and a wide range of physical external and internal characteristics which allow the consumer to distinguish them for their genetic origin by the eggshell shape and colour, and to use them for different purposes to valorise poultry biodiversity.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36611756
pii: ani13010148
doi: 10.3390/ani13010148
pmc: PMC9817804
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Subventions

Organisme : PSRN 2014-2020, sub measure 10.2 &quot;Support for sustainable conservation, use and development of genetic resources in agriculture&quot;
ID : Protection of biodiversity of Italian poultry breeds - TuBAvI

Références

Poult Sci. 2020 Jul;99(7):3319-3327
pubmed: 32616225
Poult Sci. 2013 Dec;92(12):3292-9
pubmed: 24235241
Poult Sci. 2010 Jun;89(6):1239-51
pubmed: 20460671
J Appl Genet. 2002;43(3):319-29
pubmed: 12177521
Poult Sci. 2013 Oct;92(10):2783-8
pubmed: 24046428
Animals (Basel). 2020 Mar 31;10(4):
pubmed: 32244306
Poult Sci. 2017 Oct 1;96(10):3747-3754
pubmed: 28938769
Animals (Basel). 2021 Jan 10;11(1):
pubmed: 33435195
Br Poult Sci. 2010 Oct;51(5):629-34
pubmed: 21058066
Foods. 2021 Apr 19;10(4):
pubmed: 33921822
Animals (Basel). 2020 Aug 18;10(8):
pubmed: 32824706
Poult Sci. 2020 Mar;99(3):1768-1776
pubmed: 32111337
Poult Sci. 2005 Aug;84(8):1209-13
pubmed: 16156204
Poult Sci. 2018 Nov 1;97(11):4131-4136
pubmed: 30007345
Animals (Basel). 2021 Jan 20;11(2):
pubmed: 33498554
Anim Genet. 2012 Jul;43 Suppl 1:102-13
pubmed: 22742508
Poult Sci. 2019 Feb 1;98(2):940-948
pubmed: 30137530
Poult Sci. 2012 Sep;91(9):2330-40
pubmed: 22912471
Poult Sci. 2005 Mar;84(3):482-4
pubmed: 15782919
Anim Genet. 2006 Apr;37(2):106-12
pubmed: 16573524
Trends Ecol Evol. 1995 Jul;10(7):267-70
pubmed: 21237034
Poult Sci. 2017 Jan 1;96(1):246-258
pubmed: 27591274
Science. 2017 Jun 23;356(6344):1249-1254
pubmed: 28642430
Animals (Basel). 2021 Feb 27;11(3):
pubmed: 33673450
Poult Sci. 2021 Feb;100(2):441-451
pubmed: 33518095
Poult Sci. 2013 Aug;92(8):2226-35
pubmed: 23873574
Poult Sci. 2019 Oct 1;98(10):4516-4521
pubmed: 31287885

Auteurs

Chiara Rizzi (C)

Department of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and Environment (DAFNAE), University of Padova, Viale dell'Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Italy.

Filippo Cendron (F)

Department of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and Environment (DAFNAE), University of Padova, Viale dell'Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Italy.

Mauro Penasa (M)

Department of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and Environment (DAFNAE), University of Padova, Viale dell'Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Italy.

Martino Cassandro (M)

Department of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and Environment (DAFNAE), University of Padova, Viale dell'Università 16, 35020 Legnaro, Italy.
Federazione delle Associazioni Nazionali di Razza e Specie, Via XXIV Maggio 43, 00187 Roma, Italy.

Classifications MeSH