Stereotactic MR-Guided Adaptive Radiotherapy for Pancreatic Tumors: Updated Results of the Montpellier Prospective Registry Study.
borderline resectable pancreatic cancers (BRPC)
locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC)
pancreas cancer
pancreatic tumors
stereotactic MR-guided adaptive radio therapy (SMART)
stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)
Journal
Cancers
ISSN: 2072-6694
Titre abrégé: Cancers (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101526829
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 Dec 2022
20 Dec 2022
Historique:
received:
23
11
2022
revised:
12
12
2022
accepted:
16
12
2022
entrez:
8
1
2023
pubmed:
9
1
2023
medline:
9
1
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Introduction: Stereotactic MR-guided Adaptive RadioTherapy (SMART) is a novel process to treat pancreatic tumors. We present an update of the data from our prospective registry of SMART for pancreatic tumors. Materials and methods: After the establishment of the SMART indication in a multidisciplinary board, we included all patients treated for pancreatic tumors. Primary endpoints were acute and late toxicities. Secondary endpoints were survival outcomes (local control, overall survival, distant metastasis free survival) and dosimetric advantages of adaptive process on targets volumes and OAR. Results: We included seventy consecutive patients in our cohort between October 2019 and April 2022. The prescribed dose was 50 Gy in 5 consecutive fractions. No severe acute SMART related toxicity was noted. Acute and late Grade ≤ 2 gastro intestinal were low. Daily adaptation significantly improved PTV and GTV coverage as well as OAR sparing. With a median follow-up of 10.8 months since SMART completion, the median OS, 6-months OS, and 1-year OS were 20.9 months, 86.7% (95% CI: (75−93%), and 68.6% (95% CI: (53−80%), respectively, from SMART completion. Local control at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years were, respectively, 96.8 % (95% CI: 88−99%), 86.5 (95% CI: 68−95%), and 80.7% (95% CI: 59−92%). There was no grade > 2 late toxicities. Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancers (LAPC) and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancers (BRPC) patients (52 patients) had a median OS, 6-months OS, and 1-year OS from SMART completion of 15.2 months, 84.4% (95% CI: (70−92%)), and 60.5% (95% CI: (42−75%)), respectively. The median OS, 1-year OS, and 2-year OS from initiation of induction chemotherapy were 22.3 months, 91% (95% CI: (78−97%)), and 45.8% (95% CI: (27−63%)), respectively. Twenty patients underwent surgical resection (38.7 % of patients with initially LAPC) with negative margins (R0). Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the largest series of SMART for pancreatic tumors. The treatment was well tolerated with only low-grade toxicities. Long-term OS and LC rates were achieved. SMART achieved high secondary resection rates in LAPC patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36612004
pii: cancers15010007
doi: 10.3390/cancers15010007
pmc: PMC9817834
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Radiother Oncol. 2019 Mar;132:16-22
pubmed: 30825964
Cancer. 2020 May 15;126(10):2120-2131
pubmed: 32125712
Front Oncol. 2022 Mar 09;12:842402
pubmed: 35356227
Cancer Res. 2014 Jun 1;74(11):2913-21
pubmed: 24840647
Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Dec 1;46(6):1764-1772
pubmed: 28605500
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2020 Jun 25;6(1):100506
pubmed: 33665480
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Jun;17(6):801-810
pubmed: 27160474
Radiother Oncol. 2017 Dec;125(3):439-444
pubmed: 28811038
World J Gastroenterol. 2022 Feb 21;28(7):745-754
pubmed: 35317275
Radiother Oncol. 2018 Mar;126(3):519-526
pubmed: 29277446
Cancer Med. 2019 May;8(5):2123-2132
pubmed: 30932367
Front Oncol. 2022 Jun 23;12:888462
pubmed: 35814383
CA Cancer J Clin. 2019 Jan;69(1):7-34
pubmed: 30620402
Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. 2017 Aug;1868(1):69-92
pubmed: 28249796
Cancer Radiother. 2021 May;25(3):283-295
pubmed: 33423968
JAMA. 2016 May 3;315(17):1844-53
pubmed: 27139057
Radiat Oncol. 2022 Mar 12;17(1):53
pubmed: 35279185
Radiother Oncol. 2020 May;146:97-109
pubmed: 32146260
Strahlenther Onkol. 2016 Dec;192(12):875-885
pubmed: 27778052
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2021 Mar-Apr;11(2):134-147
pubmed: 32947042