The Impact of PSMA-PET on Oncologic Control in Prostate Cancer Patients Who Experienced PSA Persistence or Recurrence.
PSMA-PET
PSMA-guided salvage treatment
hormone sensitive prostate cancer
recurrent prostate cancer
survival
Journal
Cancers
ISSN: 2072-6694
Titre abrégé: Cancers (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101526829
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 Dec 2022
30 Dec 2022
Historique:
received:
17
11
2022
revised:
22
12
2022
accepted:
27
12
2022
entrez:
8
1
2023
pubmed:
9
1
2023
medline:
9
1
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Background: Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen-Positron Emission Tomography (PSMA-PET) is currently recommended to restage prostate cancer (PCa) and to guide the delivery of salvage treatments. We aim to evaluate the oncologic outcomes of patients with recurrent PCa who received PSMA-PET. Methods: 324 hormone-sensitive PCa with PSA relapse after radical prostatectomy who underwent PSMA-PET in three high-volume European Centres. Patients have been stratified as pre-salvage who never received salvage treatments (n = 134), and post-salvage, including patients who received previous salvage therapies (n = 190). Patients with oligorecurrent (≤3 lesions), PSMA-positive disease underwent PSMA-directed treatments: salvage radiotherapy (sRT) or Metastases-directed therapy (MDT). Patients with polirecurrent (>3 lesions) PSMA-positive disease were treated with systemic therapy. Patients with negative PSMA-PET were treated with sRT or systemic therapies or observation. The primary outcome of the study was Progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary outcomes were: Metastases-free survival (MFS) and Castration Resistant Pca free survival (CRPC-FS). Results: median follow up was 23 months. In the pre-salvage setting, the PFS, MFS and CRPC-FS estimates at 3 years were 66.2% vs. 38.9%, 95.2% vs. 73.7% and 94.9% vs. 93.1% in patients with negative vs. positive PSMA-PET, respectively (all p ≥ 0.2). In the post-salvage setting, the PFS, MFS and CRPC-FS estimates at 3 years were 59.5% vs. 29.1%, 92.7% vs. 65.1% and 98.8% vs. 88.8% in patients with negative vs. positive PSMA-PET, respectively (all p ≤ 0.01). At multivariable analyses, a positive PSMA-PET was an independent predictor of progression (HR = 2.15) and metastatic disease (HR 2.37; all p ≤ 0.03). Conclusion: PSMA-PET in recurrent PCa detects the site of recurrence guiding salvage treatments and has a prognostic role in patients who received previous salvage treatments.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36612242
pii: cancers15010247
doi: 10.3390/cancers15010247
pmc: PMC9818949
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Feb 10;36(5):446-453
pubmed: 29240541
Eur Urol Oncol. 2022 Apr;5(2):146-152
pubmed: 35074282
Int J Urol. 2019 Aug;26(8):804-811
pubmed: 31083784
Nature. 2015 Apr 16;520(7547):353-357
pubmed: 25830880
Eur Urol. 2018 May;73(5):656-661
pubmed: 29358059
JAMA Oncol. 2020 May 1;6(5):650-659
pubmed: 32215577
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Jun 01;5(6):856-863
pubmed: 30920593
Eur Urol Oncol. 2022 Feb;5(1):44-51
pubmed: 34785189
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019 Jan;46(1):11-19
pubmed: 29905907
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020 Nov;47(12):2804-2815
pubmed: 32314028
BJU Int. 2022 Nov;130 Suppl 3:32-39
pubmed: 35488182
J Nucl Med. 2018 Mar;59(3):434-441
pubmed: 29242398
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017 Sep;44(10):1622-1635
pubmed: 28536833
BMC Cancer. 2017 Jun 29;17(1):453
pubmed: 28662647
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022 Jul;49(9):3257-3268
pubmed: 35217883
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020 Jan;47(1):136-146
pubmed: 31492993
J Nucl Med. 2018 May;59(5):789-794
pubmed: 29242404
BMC Cancer. 2020 May 12;20(1):406
pubmed: 32398040
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017 Jun;44(6):1014-1024
pubmed: 28283702
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021 May;48(5):1626-1638
pubmed: 33604691
Eur Urol Oncol. 2021 Dec 18;:
pubmed: 34933814
Nat Rev Urol. 2021 Nov;18(11):643-668
pubmed: 34363040
Eur Urol Focus. 2021 Mar;7(2):238-240
pubmed: 33386288
Eur Urol. 2021 Feb;79(2):243-262
pubmed: 33172724
Eur Urol. 2016 Dec;70(6):926-937
pubmed: 27363387