Dynamic Morphology of the Ascending Aorta and Its Implications for Proximal Landing in Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair.

TEVAR of ascending aorta dynamic morphology of ascending aorta endograft of ascending aorta landing zone morphology thoracic endovascular aortic repair

Journal

Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
21 Dec 2022
Historique:
received: 15 09 2022
revised: 14 12 2022
accepted: 17 12 2022
entrez: 8 1 2023
pubmed: 9 1 2023
medline: 9 1 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

In this study, we assessed the dynamic segmental anatomy of the entire ascending aorta (AA), enabling the determination of a favorable proximal landing zone and appropriate aortic sizing for the most proximal thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Methods: Patients with a non-operated AA (diameter < 40 mm) underwent electrocardiogram-gated computed tomography angiography (ECG-CTA) of the entire AA in the systolic and diastolic phases. For each plane of each segment, the maximum and minimum diameters in the systole and diastole phases were recorded. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare aortic size values. Results: A total of 100 patients were enrolled (53% male; median age 82.1 years; age range 76.8−85.1). Analysis of the dynamic plane dimensions of the AA during the cardiac cycle showed significantly higher systolic values than diastolic values (p < 0.001). Analysis of the proximal AA segment showed greater distal plane values than proximal plane values (p < 0.001), showing a reversed funnel form. At the mid-ascending segment, the dynamic values did not notably differ between the distal plane and the proximal segmental plane, demonstrating a cylindrical form. At the distal segment of the AA, the proximal plane values were larger than the distal segmental plane values (p < 0.001), thus generating a funnel form. Conclusions: The entire AA showed greater systolic than diastolic aortic dimensions throughout the cardiac cycle. The mid-ascending and distal-ascending segments showed favorable forms for TEVAR using a regular cylindrical endograft design. The most proximal segment of the AA showed a pronounced conical form; therefore, a specific endograft design should be considered.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36614871
pii: jcm12010070
doi: 10.3390/jcm12010070
pmc: PMC9821435
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Références

Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2022 Mar 08;18:117-122
pubmed: 35300364
Eur J Radiol. 2012 Jan;81(1):158-64
pubmed: 20850234
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2012 Nov 14;14:77
pubmed: 23151055
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Jan;67(1):332-342
pubmed: 28844469
J Endovasc Ther. 2020 Jun;27(3):368-376
pubmed: 32242769
Ann Vasc Surg. 2017 Jan;38:227-232
pubmed: 27522983
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Dec;66(6):1686-1695
pubmed: 28583728
J Endovasc Ther. 2016 Aug;23(4):620-5
pubmed: 27170148
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Jun;61(6):1383-90.e1
pubmed: 25735260
Ann Vasc Surg. 2016 Aug;35:168-73
pubmed: 27263817
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011 Dec;27(8):1195-204
pubmed: 21359833
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2018 May 2;18(1):76
pubmed: 29720088
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 Jan 1;55(1):133-162
pubmed: 30312382
J Vasc Surg. 2022 May;75(5):1561-1569
pubmed: 34973400
Ann Vasc Surg. 2020 Jan;62:173-182
pubmed: 31394211
J Vasc Surg. 2004 Jan;39(1):20-6
pubmed: 14718806
Hypertension. 2010 Feb;55(2):319-26
pubmed: 20065154
J Endovasc Ther. 2007 Aug;14(4):551-60
pubmed: 17696632
J Endovasc Ther. 2022 Jul 12;:15266028221109455
pubmed: 35822261
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Dec;72(6):1883-1890
pubmed: 32289436
Eur J Radiol. 2009 Dec;72(3):483-8
pubmed: 18805663
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2006 Nov;32(5):532-6
pubmed: 16798028
J Endovasc Ther. 2022 May 19;:15266028221095018
pubmed: 35587698
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Nov;66(5):1587-1601
pubmed: 28830707
J Endovasc Ther. 2019 Aug;26(4):439-445
pubmed: 31140362
Eur Radiol. 2009 Jan;19(1):245-53
pubmed: 18648819
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2018 Jul 31;18(1):154
pubmed: 30064358

Auteurs

Denis Skrypnik (D)

Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.

Marius Ante (M)

Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.

Katrin Meisenbacher (K)

Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.

Dorothea Kronsteiner (D)

Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, University of Heidelberg, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany.

Matthias Hagedorn (M)

Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.

Fabian Rengier (F)

Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.

Florian Andre (F)

Clinic for Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.

Norbert Frey (N)

Clinic for Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.

Dittmar Böckler (D)

Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.

Moritz S Bischoff (MS)

Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.

Classifications MeSH