Clinical Effectiveness of Non-Immersive Virtual Reality Tasks for Post-Stroke Neuro-Rehabilitation of Distal Upper-Extremities: A Case Report.
DTI
case report
cortical excitability
distal upper extremities
fMRI
neuro-rehabilitation
stroke
virtual reality
Journal
Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 Dec 2022
22 Dec 2022
Historique:
received:
11
11
2022
revised:
19
12
2022
accepted:
19
12
2022
entrez:
8
1
2023
pubmed:
9
1
2023
medline:
9
1
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
A library of non-immersive Virtual Reality (VR) tasks were developed for post-stroke rehabilitation of distal upper extremities. The objective was to evaluate the rehabilitation impact of the developed VR-tasks on a patient with chronic stroke. The study involved a 50-year-old male patient with chronic (13 month) stroke. Twenty VR therapy sessions of 45 min each were given. Clinical scales, cortical-excitability measures, functional MRI (fMRI), and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) data were acquired pre-and post-therapy to evaluate the motor recovery. Increase in Fugl-Meyer Assessment (wrist/hand) by 2 units, Barthel Index by 5 units, Brunnstrom Stage by 1 unit, Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination by 3 units, Wrist Active Range of Motion by 5° and decrease in Modified Ashworth Scale by 1 unit were observed. Ipsilesional Motor Evoked Potential (MEP) amplitude (obtained using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation) was increased by 60.9µV with a decrease in Resting Motor Threshold (RMT) by 7%, and contralesional MEP amplitude was increased by 56.2µV with a decrease in RMT by 7%. The fMRI-derived Laterality Index of Sensorimotor Cortex increased in precentral-gyrus (from 0.28 to 0.33) and in postcentral-gyrus (from 0.07 to 0.3). The DTI-derived FA-asymmetry decreased in precentral-gyrus (from 0.029 to 0.024) and in postcentral-gyrus (from 0.027 to 0.017). Relative reduction in task-specific performance metrics, i.e., time taken to complete the task (31.6%), smoothness of trajectory (76.7%), and relative percentage error (80.7%), were observed from day 1 to day 20 of the VR therapy. VR therapy resulted in improvement in clinical outcomes in a patient with chronic stroke. The research also gives insights to further improve the overall system of rehabilitation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36614892
pii: jcm12010092
doi: 10.3390/jcm12010092
pmc: PMC9820917
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Case Reports
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : Science and Engineering Research Board
ID : TTR/2021/000035
Organisme : Indian Council of Medical Research
ID : 55/4/1/CARE-Disability & AT/2020/NCD-II
Références
Lancet. 2011 May 14;377(9778):1693-702
pubmed: 21571152
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015 Sep;29(8):767-76
pubmed: 25549656
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2015 Oct;57:392-400
pubmed: 26344667
Neuroimage. 2009 Aug;47 Suppl 2:T90-7
pubmed: 19286464
Brain Struct Funct. 2015 Mar;220(2):1093-107
pubmed: 24415059
Clin Neurophysiol. 2015 Jun;126(6):1071-1107
pubmed: 25797650
Clin Neurophysiol. 2012 May;123(5):858-82
pubmed: 22349304
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011 Mar-Apr;25(3):275-84
pubmed: 21357529
J Neuroimaging. 2020 Jan;30(1):5-14
pubmed: 31608550
Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2013 Jul;16(3):394-7
pubmed: 24101824
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2016 Nov 2;13(1):96
pubmed: 27806718
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Apr;96(4 Suppl):S94-103
pubmed: 25194451
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007 Jun;78(6):587-92
pubmed: 17210628
Neural Regen Res. 2017 Nov;12(11):1823-1831
pubmed: 29239328
JAMA. 2004 Oct 20;292(15):1853-61
pubmed: 15494583
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 27;19(3):
pubmed: 35162459
Neural Regen Res. 2013 Nov 5;8(31):2904-13
pubmed: 25206611
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007 Sep-Oct;21(5):412-28
pubmed: 17369516
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2007;23(4):243-55
pubmed: 17192704
Neuroimage. 2004 Aug;22(4):1767-74
pubmed: 15275932
Stroke. 2000 Jun;31(6):1360-4
pubmed: 10835457
Neural Plast. 2016;2016:6238575
pubmed: 27840742
Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Jun 19;13:210
pubmed: 31275126
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Nov;86(11):2218-23
pubmed: 16271575
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2021 Nov 3;18(1):158
pubmed: 34732203
Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2005;23(1):11-7
pubmed: 15846028
Brain. 2007 Jan;130(Pt 1):170-80
pubmed: 17148468
Neurotherapeutics. 2020 Oct;17(4):1919-1930
pubmed: 32671578
Neuroimage Clin. 2019;21:101620
pubmed: 30527907
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008 Mar-Apr;22(2):111-21
pubmed: 17876068
Brain. 2003 Jun;126(Pt 6):1430-48
pubmed: 12764063
Front Neuroeng. 2014 Jul 29;7:31
pubmed: 25120466
Neuroimage. 2007 Jan 1;34(1):322-31
pubmed: 17045490
Stroke. 2002 Jun;33(6):1610-7
pubmed: 12053000
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Sep 21;11:469
pubmed: 28983244
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2000 Aug;69(2):269-72
pubmed: 10896709
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Aug;95(8):1461-9
pubmed: 24657112
Ann Neurol. 1991 Jan;29(1):63-71
pubmed: 1996881
Brain. 2002 Jul;125(Pt 7):1544-57
pubmed: 12077004
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2001 Sep;9(3):308-18
pubmed: 11561668
J Neurosurg. 2001 Jun;94(6):955-60
pubmed: 11409525
Ann Rehabil Med. 2016 Jun;40(3):420-31
pubmed: 27446778
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2016 Feb 24;13:17
pubmed: 26911438
Brain. 1993 Dec;116 ( Pt 6):1387-98
pubmed: 8293277
Neurosci Lett. 2010 Sep 20;482(1):21-5
pubmed: 20609381
Stroke. 2013 May;44(5):1375-82
pubmed: 23532011