Development and External Validation of the STRATified CANcer Surveillance (STRATCANS) Multivariable Model for Predicting Progression in Men with Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer Starting Active Surveillance.
Cambridge Prognostic Groups (CPG)
MRI
PSA
active surveillance
biopsy
non-metastatic disease
prostate cancer
risk model
risk prediction
Journal
Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 Dec 2022
27 Dec 2022
Historique:
received:
28
08
2022
revised:
06
12
2022
accepted:
25
12
2022
entrez:
8
1
2023
pubmed:
9
1
2023
medline:
9
1
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
For men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer, we aimed to develop and validate a model to predict the risk of progression on active surveillance (AS), which could inform more personalised AS strategies. In total, 883 men from 3 European centres were used for model development and internal validation, and 151 men from a fourth European centre were used for external validation. Men with Cambridge Prognostic Group (CPG) 1-2 disease at diagnosis were eligible. The endpoint was progression to the composite endpoint of CPG3 disease or worse (≥CPG3). Model performance at 4 years was evaluated through discrimination (C-index), calibration plots, and decision curve analysis. The final multivariable model incorporated prostate-specific antigen (PSA), Grade Group, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) score (Prostate Imaging Reporting & Data System (PI-RADS) or Likert), and prostate volume. Calibration and discrimination were good in both internal validation (C-index 0.742, 95% CI 0.694-0.793) and external validation (C-index 0.845, 95% CI 0.712-0.958). In decision curve analysis, the model offered net benefit compared to a 'follow-all' strategy at risk thresholds of ≥0.08 and ≥0.04 in development and external validation, respectively. In conclusion, our model demonstrated good accuracy and clinical utility in predicting the progression on AS at 4 years post-diagnosis. Men with lower risk predictions could subsequently be offered less-intense surveillance. Further external validation in larger cohorts is now required.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36615017
pii: jcm12010216
doi: 10.3390/jcm12010216
pmc: PMC9821695
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
BMC Med. 2018 Feb 28;16(1):31
pubmed: 29490658
Urol Oncol. 2021 Jul;39(7):432.e1-432.e10
pubmed: 33308973
Eur Radiol. 2021 May;31(5):2696-2705
pubmed: 33196886
BJU Int. 2016 Sep;118(3):366-71
pubmed: 26765682
Eur Urol. 2017 Mar;71(3):353-365
pubmed: 27543165
Stat Med. 2019 Mar 30;38(7):1276-1296
pubmed: 30357870
Nat Rev Urol. 2020 Sep;17(9):499-512
pubmed: 32699318
BJU Int. 2020 Jan;125(1):49-55
pubmed: 31599113
JAMA Oncol. 2020 Oct 1;6(10):e203187
pubmed: 32852532
BJU Int. 2019 Nov;124(5):758-767
pubmed: 31063245
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jul 10;29(20):2795-800
pubmed: 21632511
Eur Urol. 2014 Jun;65(6):1023-31
pubmed: 24491309
PLoS Med. 2016 Aug 02;13(8):e1002063
pubmed: 27483464
Transl Androl Urol. 2018 Feb;7(1):83-97
pubmed: 29594023
Lancet. 2017 Feb 25;389(10071):815-822
pubmed: 28110982
Med Decis Making. 2006 Nov-Dec;26(6):565-74
pubmed: 17099194
Eur Urol. 2019 Nov;76(5):693-702
pubmed: 31451332
BJU Int. 2021 Jan;127(1):96-107
pubmed: 32531869
Eur Urol Focus. 2019 Jul;5(4):592-599
pubmed: 29226826
J Urol. 2017 Mar;197(3 Pt 1):621-626
pubmed: 27663459
J Urol. 2018 Mar;199(3):683-690
pubmed: 29203269
BMC Urol. 2015 Jun 13;15:52
pubmed: 26070313
N Engl J Med. 2018 May 10;378(19):1767-1777
pubmed: 29552975
Eur Urol. 2015 Nov;68(5):814-21
pubmed: 26138043
Br J Radiol. 2020 Aug;93(1112):20200298
pubmed: 32479105
Patient. 2014;7(4):427-36
pubmed: 24920082
J Urol. 2009 Nov;182(5):2274-8
pubmed: 19758635
Eur Urol Oncol. 2018 Oct;1(5):386-394
pubmed: 31158077