Impact of recycled manure solids bedding on hygiene and odds of hock lesions in dairy cows.

bedding dairy hock lesions hygiene recycled manure solids

Journal

Frontiers in veterinary science
ISSN: 2297-1769
Titre abrégé: Front Vet Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101666658

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 04 10 2022
accepted: 08 12 2022
entrez: 9 1 2023
pubmed: 10 1 2023
medline: 10 1 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The use of recycled manure solids (RMS) as bedding for dairy cows has become more popular over the last decade. Once producers own the RMS producing equipment, they are not restricted in the amount of bedding they can use in stalls, due to its large availability and low production costs. Thus, they are usually able to provide a soft lying area for their cows. Nevertheless, the potential positive impact of RMS on cows' hygiene and odds of hock lesions is not clearly demonstrated. Objectives of this research were, therefore, to compare RMS-bedded cows' hygiene level and odds of hock lesions to straw-bedded cows (comparative group). To achieve this, an observational cross-sectional study was conducted in 27 RMS- and 61 straw-bedded herds. During the farm visit, 30 cows per herd were scored for hygiene of three body regions (udder, lower legs and flank/upper legs) using a score ranging from 1 to 4 (1 being the cleanest and 4 the dirtiest). In addition, both hocks were scored (0 to 3) to evaluate the presence of lesions (0 when there was no lesion and 3 when a swelling protrusion > 2.5 cm was present). Continuation-ratio models were used to compute the odds of having a given score to the odds of having a lower score. Recycled manure solids usage was associated with lower odds of having an udder hygiene score ≥3 [odds ratio (OR): 0.43; 95% CI: 0.20, 0.95] and of having a score of 4 (OR: 0.29; 95% CI: 0.09, 0.93). It was also associated, compared to straw, with cleaner lower legs. We observed lower odds of having a score ≥2 (OR: 0.45; 95% CI: 0.21, 0.98), ≥3 (OR: 0.16; 95% CI: 0.04, 0.66), or a score of 4 (OR: 0.07; 95% CI: 0.01, 0.40) in RMS-bedded herds. No statistically significant association could be highlighted between RMS usage and flank/upper legs hygiene. Furthermore, we did not observe any statistically significant associations between bedding type (RMS vs. straw) and odds of hock lesions. In conclusion, cows bedded with RMS had generally cleaner udders and cleaner lower legs than straw-bedded ones. No association was found between bedding type and odds of hock lesions.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36619960
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.1061632
pmc: PMC9816320
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1061632

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Fréchette, Fecteau and Dufour.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

J Dairy Sci. 2019 Jul;102(7):6682-6698
pubmed: 31128869
J Dairy Sci. 2017 Mar;100(3):2119-2136
pubmed: 28041728
J Dairy Sci. 2012 Oct;95(10):5626-34
pubmed: 22863089
J Dairy Sci. 2007 Jul;90(7):3559-66
pubmed: 17582141
J Dairy Sci. 2019 Nov;102(11):10213-10234
pubmed: 31447166
Front Vet Sci. 2022 Apr 22;9:859858
pubmed: 35529833
Front Vet Sci. 2021 Sep 23;8:742868
pubmed: 34631863
J Dairy Sci. 2019 Dec;102(12):11308-11316
pubmed: 31548050
J Dairy Sci. 2000 Apr;83(4):697-702
pubmed: 10791785
J Dairy Sci. 2020 Nov;103(11):10940-10950
pubmed: 32952019
J Dairy Sci. 2022 Jan;105(1):389-408
pubmed: 34656347
J Dairy Sci. 2016 Jun;99(6):4707-4717
pubmed: 27060828
Vet J. 2014 Nov;202(2):222-8
pubmed: 25201250
J Dairy Sci. 2020 Jan;103(1):128-140
pubmed: 31677843
J Dairy Sci. 2003 Feb;86(2):521-9
pubmed: 12647958
Vet J. 2015 Nov;206(2):123-30
pubmed: 26388545
J Dairy Sci. 2008 Dec;91(12):4673-8
pubmed: 19038943
J Dairy Sci. 2010 Oct;93(10):4668-76
pubmed: 20855001
Vet Rec. 2011 Dec 10;169(24):634
pubmed: 21994312
J Dairy Sci. 2019 Apr;102(4):3376-3391
pubmed: 30738676

Auteurs

Annie Fréchette (A)

Regroupement FRQ-NT Op+Lait, Saint-Hyacinthe, QC, Canada.
Mastitis Network, Saint-Hyacinthe, QC, Canada.
Department of Pathology and Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Université de Montréal, Saint-Hyacinthe, QC, Canada.

Gilles Fecteau (G)

Regroupement FRQ-NT Op+Lait, Saint-Hyacinthe, QC, Canada.
Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Université de Montréal, Saint-Hyacinthe, QC, Canada.

Simon Dufour (S)

Regroupement FRQ-NT Op+Lait, Saint-Hyacinthe, QC, Canada.
Mastitis Network, Saint-Hyacinthe, QC, Canada.
Department of Pathology and Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Université de Montréal, Saint-Hyacinthe, QC, Canada.

Classifications MeSH