Intrathoracic surgery as part of primary cytoreduction for advanced ovarian cancer: Going to the next level - A Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center study.
Cytoreduction
Intrathoracic surgery
Ovarian cancer
Journal
Gynecologic oncology
ISSN: 1095-6859
Titre abrégé: Gynecol Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0365304
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2023
03 2023
Historique:
received:
15
11
2022
revised:
28
12
2022
accepted:
29
12
2022
pmc-release:
01
03
2024
pubmed:
10
1
2023
medline:
15
3
2023
entrez:
9
1
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We investigated the feasibility, safety, and survival outcomes of intrathoracic cytoreduction during primary debulking surgery (PDS) for advanced ovarian cancer. We conducted a database review of patients with stage IIIB-IV ovarian (including fallopian tube and primary peritoneal) carcinoma who underwent PDS at our institution from 01/01/2006-9/30/2021. Patients who underwent intrathoracic cytoreduction as part of primary treatment were included. Patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy or surgery for reasons other than cytoreduction were excluded. Among 178 patients identified for inclusion, complete gross resection (CGR) in the abdomen and thorax was achieved in 131 (74%); 45 (25%) had optimal cytoreduction, and 2 (1%) had suboptimal cytoreduction. Thirty-one patients (17%) had at least one grade ≥ 3 complication; 8 were possibly related to intrathoracic cytoreduction. There were no deaths within 30 days following surgery. Median length of follow-up among survivors was 53.4 months. Among all patients, the median PFS was 33.6 months (95% CI: 24.7-61.9) and the 3-year PFS rate was 48.9% (95% CI: 41.2%-56.2%). Median OS was 81.3 months (95% CI: 68.9-103). When stratified by residual disease status, median PFS was 51.8 months when CGR was achieved versus 16.7 months with residual disease (HR: 2.17; P < .001) and median OS was 97.6 months when CGR was achieved versus 65.9 months with residual disease (HR: 2.05; P = .003). Intrathoracic cytoreduction during PDS for advanced ovarian cancer is both safe and feasible. CGR can be achieved in patients with intrathoracic disease if properly selected, and could significantly improve both PFS and OS.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36621269
pii: S0090-8258(22)02023-6
doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.12.023
pmc: PMC10023324
mid: NIHMS1863444
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
46-53Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA008748
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest Outside of the submitted work, REO reports honoraria from GSK, Bayer, Regeneron, SeaGen, Fresenius Kabi, Immunogen, MJH Life Sciences, and Curio. AI reports consulting fees from Mylan. NAR reports grant funding from GRAIL paid to the institution. RG reports honoraria from GSK, AstraZeneca, Natera, Springworks, Corcept, MJH, and PER. DC reports personal fees from Apyx Medical, Verthermia Inc., Biom ‘Up, and AstraZeneca, as well as recent or current stock/options ownership of Apyx Medical, Verthemia, Intuitive Surgical, Inc., TransEnterix, Inc., Doximity, Moderna, and BioNTech SE. DJ reports consulting fees from AstraZeneca and serves on a clinical trial steering committee at Merck. BJP reports consulting fees from Intuitive Surgical, AstraZenenca, Medtronic, and CEEVRA. All other authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.
Références
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Nov;30(11):1657-1664
pubmed: 33028623
Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Jul;114(1):26-31
pubmed: 19395008
Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Apr;145(1):21-26
pubmed: 28159407
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Aug 10;(8):CD007565
pubmed: 21833960
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Oct;159(1):66-71
pubmed: 32792282
Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Mar;140(3):436-42
pubmed: 26777991
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Dec 1;23(34):8802-11
pubmed: 16314640
J Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Oct;26(4):336-42
pubmed: 26197773
Gynecol Oncol. 2012 May;125(2):483-92
pubmed: 22366151
Cancer. 2007 Apr 15;109(8):1513-22
pubmed: 17354232
Gynecol Oncol. 2006 Nov;103(2):559-64
pubmed: 16714056
Lancet. 2015 Jul 18;386(9990):249-57
pubmed: 26002111
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Apr;170(4):974-9; discussion 979-80
pubmed: 8166218
Gynecol Oncol. 2000 Sep;78(3 Pt 1):269-74
pubmed: 10985879
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Dec;19(12):1680-1687
pubmed: 30413383
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009 Feb;35(2):135-43
pubmed: 18289825
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Nov;24(12):3700-3705
pubmed: 28861808
Gynecol Oncol. 2018 Oct;151(1):24-31
pubmed: 30126704
Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Sep;130(3):493-8
pubmed: 23747291
Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1975 Oct;42:101-4
pubmed: 1234624
Gynecol Oncol. 2003 Aug;90(2 Pt 2):S33-9
pubmed: 12928004
Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Jan;140(1):15-21
pubmed: 26541980
Gynecol Oncol. 2010 Mar;116(3):483-8
pubmed: 19945741
J Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Apr;26(2):87-9
pubmed: 25872889
Gynecol Oncol. 2007 Jul;106(1):69-74
pubmed: 17397910
Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Jan;107(1):77-85
pubmed: 16394043
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2011 May;21(4):750-5
pubmed: 21543936
Gynecol Oncol. 2001 Sep;82(3):489-97
pubmed: 11520145