New Home, New You: A retrospective mixed-methods evaluation of a health-related behavioural intervention programme supporting social housing tenants.
adult
health
housing
mental health
social housing
Journal
Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy
ISSN: 1369-7625
Titre abrégé: Health Expect
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9815926
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2023
04 2023
Historique:
revised:
15
11
2022
received:
06
03
2022
accepted:
22
12
2022
pubmed:
12
1
2023
medline:
15
3
2023
entrez:
11
1
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Social housing tenants are at greater risk of engaging in unhealthy behaviours than the general population. Housing association employees are in an ideal position to contribute positively to their tenants' health. 'New Home, New You' (NHNY) is a joint venture between a social housing association, a city council and a community healthcare provider in the South West of England. It was designed with the aim of improving the health and well-being of social housing tenants. The aim of this retrospective evaluation was to establish whether social housing tenants were benefiting from this health-related behavioural intervention in terms of their mental well-being and health-related behaviours. This was a mixed-methods evaluation. The outcome evaluation was a secondary analysis of quantitative data collected during the NHNY project. The process of delivering and receiving the intervention was evaluated using qualitative, semi-structured interviews with housing officers and tenants who had participated in the programme. The development of the intervention was evaluated through a focus group and additional semistructured interviews with key stakeholders. Quantitative data were analysed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. Qualitative interviews were analysed using thematic analysis. Six key stakeholders and a total of seven housing officers from several teams and seven tenants were interviewed. Of the 1016 tenants who were invited to participate in NHNY, 226 enroled in the programme. For participating tenants, the scope for health-related behaviour change was greatest in relation to eating and smoking. Small positive statistically significant changes in mental health were found between the 6- and 12-month mean score and between the baseline and the 12-month score. The findings indicate that NHNY may have been beneficial for some participating tenants. Housing officers can have a significant role in promoting health messages and embedding behaviour change among their tenants. Although the programme was implemented as a service improvement rather than a controlled trial and focused on a particular intervention and geographical area, other housing associations may find this evaluation useful for considering whether to adopt some of the principles applied in NHNY in other settings. A social housing tenant representative provided input on the methodology and methods used to evaluate NHNY, as well as the information sheet.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Social housing tenants are at greater risk of engaging in unhealthy behaviours than the general population. Housing association employees are in an ideal position to contribute positively to their tenants' health. 'New Home, New You' (NHNY) is a joint venture between a social housing association, a city council and a community healthcare provider in the South West of England. It was designed with the aim of improving the health and well-being of social housing tenants.
OBJECTIVES
The aim of this retrospective evaluation was to establish whether social housing tenants were benefiting from this health-related behavioural intervention in terms of their mental well-being and health-related behaviours.
METHODS
This was a mixed-methods evaluation. The outcome evaluation was a secondary analysis of quantitative data collected during the NHNY project. The process of delivering and receiving the intervention was evaluated using qualitative, semi-structured interviews with housing officers and tenants who had participated in the programme. The development of the intervention was evaluated through a focus group and additional semistructured interviews with key stakeholders. Quantitative data were analysed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. Qualitative interviews were analysed using thematic analysis.
RESULTS
Six key stakeholders and a total of seven housing officers from several teams and seven tenants were interviewed. Of the 1016 tenants who were invited to participate in NHNY, 226 enroled in the programme. For participating tenants, the scope for health-related behaviour change was greatest in relation to eating and smoking. Small positive statistically significant changes in mental health were found between the 6- and 12-month mean score and between the baseline and the 12-month score.
CONCLUSIONS
The findings indicate that NHNY may have been beneficial for some participating tenants. Housing officers can have a significant role in promoting health messages and embedding behaviour change among their tenants. Although the programme was implemented as a service improvement rather than a controlled trial and focused on a particular intervention and geographical area, other housing associations may find this evaluation useful for considering whether to adopt some of the principles applied in NHNY in other settings.
PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION
A social housing tenant representative provided input on the methodology and methods used to evaluate NHNY, as well as the information sheet.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36628614
doi: 10.1111/hex.13700
pmc: PMC10010073
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
752-764Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors. Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Am J Public Health. 2008 Jan;98(1):85-91
pubmed: 18048798
J Community Health Nurs. 2017 Oct-Dec;34(4):203-213
pubmed: 29023160
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009 Jun 19;9:40
pubmed: 19545366
BMJ Open. 2014 Nov 28;4(11):e006046
pubmed: 25432903
Health Expect. 2023 Apr;26(2):752-764
pubmed: 36628614
Qual Life Res. 2017 May;26(5):1129-1144
pubmed: 27853963
Can J Public Health. 1986 Nov-Dec;77(6):425-30
pubmed: 3580992
Am J Health Promot. 2014 Mar-Apr;28(4):268-74
pubmed: 23875989
J Prev Interv Community. 2015;43(2):109-22
pubmed: 25898218
J Public Health (Oxf). 2020 Aug 18;42(3):e231-e238
pubmed: 31294793
BMC Public Health. 2016 Jun 28;16:521
pubmed: 27353149
J Community Psychol. 2019 Nov;47(8):1834-1849
pubmed: 31421655
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007 Nov 27;5:63
pubmed: 18042300
Implement Sci. 2011 Apr 23;6:42
pubmed: 21513547
JAMA. 2016 Apr 26;315(16):1750-66
pubmed: 27063997