Social Psychology of and for World-Making.
cultural psychology
ethics
imagination
methodological pluralism
social psychology
world-making
Journal
Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc
ISSN: 1532-7957
Titre abrégé: Pers Soc Psychol Rev
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9703164
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2023
Nov 2023
Historique:
medline:
23
10
2023
pubmed:
12
1
2023
entrez:
11
1
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Social psychology's disconnect from the vital and urgent questions of people's lived experiences reveals limitations in the current paradigm. We draw on a related perspective in social psychology We propose that social psychology should focus on "world-making" in two senses. First, people are future-oriented and often are guided more by what could be than what is. Second, social psychology can contribute to this future orientation by supporting people's world-making and also critically reflecting on the role of social psychological research in world-making. We unpack the philosophical assumptions, methodological procedures, and ethical considerations that underpin a social psychology of and for world-making. Social psychological research, whether it is intended or not, contributes to the societies and cultures in which we live, and thus it cannot be a passive bystander of world-making. By embracing social psychology of and for world-making and facing up to the contemporary societal challenges upon which our collective future depends will make social psychology more humble but also more relevant.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36628932
doi: 10.1177/10888683221145756
pmc: PMC10559643
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
378-392Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Références
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2020 Mar;54(1):152-157
pubmed: 31338787
Br J Soc Psychol. 2013 Jun;52(2):290-309
pubmed: 22007756
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Mar;96(3):574-87
pubmed: 19254104
J Health Soc Behav. 2015 Mar;56(1):131-48
pubmed: 25722129
Science. 2019 Nov 8;366(6466):
pubmed: 31699908
Curr Opin Psychol. 2020 Oct;35:36-40
pubmed: 32283520
Br J Soc Psychol. 2006 Mar;45(Pt 1):1-40; discussion 47-53
pubmed: 16573869
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2013 Sep;47(3):305-24
pubmed: 23625542
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Feb 26;116(9):3476-3481
pubmed: 30808741
Behav Brain Sci. 2010 Jun;33(2-3):61-83; discussion 83-135
pubmed: 20550733
Science. 2015 Aug 28;349(6251):aac4716
pubmed: 26315443
Lancet Planet Health. 2022 Mar;6(3):e230-e242
pubmed: 35278389
Annu Rev Psychol. 2018 Jan 4;69:511-534
pubmed: 29068778
Nat Med. 2021 Feb;27(2):225-228
pubmed: 33082575
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2018 May;13(3):359-372
pubmed: 29361241
Hum Dev. 2020 Jan;63(3-4):153-179
pubmed: 32139922
Nat Hum Behav. 2018 Sep;2(9):637-644
pubmed: 31346273
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010 Feb;11(2):127-38
pubmed: 20068583
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2014 Dec;48(4):435-52
pubmed: 24763935
Am Psychol. 2022 Nov;77(8):940-952
pubmed: 34807631
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2022 Sep;56(3):755-778
pubmed: 34782992
Am Psychol. 2019 Oct;74(7):809-822
pubmed: 31380665
Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Oct 25;41:e120
pubmed: 29065933
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2012 Dec;46(4):493-511
pubmed: 22843429
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2020 Feb;24(1):78-99
pubmed: 31642390