An atlas of substrate specificities for the human serine/threonine kinome.
Journal
Nature
ISSN: 1476-4687
Titre abrégé: Nature
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0410462
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2023
01 2023
Historique:
received:
01
05
2022
accepted:
17
11
2022
pubmed:
12
1
2023
medline:
28
1
2023
entrez:
11
1
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Protein phosphorylation is one of the most widespread post-translational modifications in biology
Identifiants
pubmed: 36631611
doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05575-3
pii: 10.1038/s41586-022-05575-3
pmc: PMC9876800
doi:
Substances chimiques
Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases
EC 2.7.11.1
Serine
452VLY9402
Threonine
2ZD004190S
Proteome
0
Phosphoproteins
0
Phosphoserine
17885-08-4
Phosphothreonine
1114-81-4
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
759-766Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P01 CA120964
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P01 CA117969
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : R01 GM104047
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA014051
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIEHS NIH HHS
ID : R35 ES028374
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : T32 CA203702
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDDK NIH HHS
ID : U24 DK116204
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA226898
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : R35 GM139550
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R35 CA197588
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Cohen, P. The origins of protein phosphorylation. Nat. Cell Biol. 4, E127–E130 (2002).
doi: 10.1038/ncb0502-e127
Manning, G., Whyte, D. B., Martinez, R., Hunter, T. & Sudarsanam, S. The protein kinase complement of the human genome. Science 298, 1912–1934 (2002).
doi: 10.1126/science.1075762
Hornbeck, P. V. et al. 15 years of PhosphoSitePlus®: integrating post-translationally modified sites, disease variants and isoforms. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D433–D441 (2019).
doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1159
Ochoa, D. et al. The functional landscape of the human phosphoproteome. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 365–373 (2020).
doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0344-3
Fuhs, S. R. & Hunter, T. pHisphorylation: the emergence of histidine phosphorylation as a reversible regulatory modification. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 45, 8–16 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2016.12.010
Hunter, T. Why nature chose phosphate to modify proteins. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 367, 2513–2516 (2012).
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0013
Lahiry, P., Torkamani, A., Schork, N. J. & Hegele, R. A. Kinase mutations in human disease: interpreting genotype–phenotype relationships. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11, 60–74 (2010).
doi: 10.1038/nrg2707
Berginski, M. E. et al. The Dark Kinase Knowledgebase: an online compendium of knowledge and experimental results of understudied kinases. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, D529–D535 (2021).
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa853
Edwards, A. M. et al. Too many roads not taken. Nature 470, 163–165 (2011).
doi: 10.1038/470163a
Needham, E. J., Parker, B. L., Burykin, T., James, D. E. & Humphrey, S. J. Illuminating the dark phosphoproteome. Sci. Signal. 12, eaau8645 (2019).
doi: 10.1126/scisignal.aau8645
Lemeer, S. & Heck, A. J. The phosphoproteomics data explosion. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 13, 414–420 (2009).
doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2009.06.022
Aebersold, R. & Mann, M. Mass-spectrometric exploration of proteome structure and function. Nature 537, 347–355 (2016).
doi: 10.1038/nature19949
Riley, N. M. & Coon, J. J. Phosphoproteomics in the age of rapid and deep proteome profiling. Anal. Chem. 88, 74–94 (2016).
doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b04123
Kemp, B. E., Graves, D. J., Benjamini, E. & Krebs, E. G. Role of multiple basic residues in determining the substrate specificity of cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 252, 4888–4894 (1977).
doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(17)40137-2
Kemp, B. E. & Pearson, R. B. Protein kinase recognition sequence motifs. Trends Biochem. Sci. 15, 342–346 (1990).
doi: 10.1016/0968-0004(90)90073-K
Marin, O., Meggio, F., Marchiori, F., Borin, G. & Pinna, L. A. Site specificity of casein kinase‐2 (TS) from rat liver cytosol: a study with model peptide substrates. Eur. J. Biochem. 160, 239–244 (1986).
doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1986.tb09962.x
Clark-Lewis, I., Sanghera, J. S. & Pelech, S. Definition of a consensus sequence for peptide substrate recognition by p44
doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)98601-1
Songyang, Z. et al. Use of an oriented peptide library to determine the optimal substrates of protein kinases. Curr. Biol. 4, 973–982 (1994).
doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00221-9
Hutti, J. E. et al. A rapid method for determining protein kinase phosphorylation specificity. Nat. Methods 1, 27–29 (2004).
doi: 10.1038/nmeth708
Mok, J. et al. Deciphering protein kinase specificity through large-scale analysis of yeast phosphorylation site motifs. Sci. Signal. 3, ra12 (2010).
doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2000482
Pearce, L. R., Komander, D. & Alessi, D. R. The nuts and bolts of AGC protein kinases. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11, 9–22 (2010).
doi: 10.1038/nrm2822
Kim, S.-T., Lim, D.-S., Canman, C. E. & Kastan, M. B. Substrate specificities and identification of putative substrates of ATM kinase family members. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 37538–37543 (1999).
doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.53.37538
O’Neill, T. et al. Utilization of oriented peptide libraries to identify substrate motifs selected by ATM. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 22719–22727 (2000).
doi: 10.1074/jbc.M001002200
Shah, N. H. et al. An electrostatic selection mechanism controls sequential kinase signaling downstream of the T cell receptor. eLife 5, e20105 (2016).
doi: 10.7554/eLife.20105
Zhu, G. et al. Exceptional disfavor for proline at the P + 1 position among AGC and CAMK kinases establishes reciprocal specificity between them and the proline-directed kinases. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 10743–10748 (2005).
doi: 10.1074/jbc.M413159200
Alexander, J. et al. Spatial exclusivity combined with positive and negative selection of phosphorylation motifs is the basis for context-dependent mitotic signaling. Sci. Signal. 4, ra42 (2011).
doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2001796
Reiter, E. & Lefkowitz, R. J. GRKs and β-arrestins: roles in receptor silencing, trafficking and signaling. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 17, 159–165 (2006).
doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2006.03.008
Moore, C. A., Milano, S. K. & Benovic, J. L. Regulation of receptor trafficking by GRKs and arrestins. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 69, 451–482 (2007).
doi: 10.1146/annurev.physiol.69.022405.154712
Bradley, D. et al. Sequence and structure-based analysis of specificity determinants in eukaryotic protein kinases. Cell Rep. 34, 108602 (2021).
doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108602
Taylor, S. S. & Kornev, A. P. Protein kinases: evolution of dynamic regulatory proteins. Trends Biochem. Sci. 36, 65–77 (2011).
doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2010.09.006
Creixell, P. et al. Unmasking determinants of specificity in the human kinome. Cell 163, 187–201 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.08.057
Miller, M. L. et al. Linear motif atlas for phosphorylation-dependent signaling. Sci. Signal. 1, ra2 (2008).
doi: 10.1126/scisignal.1159433
Chen, C. et al. Identification of a major determinant for serine-threonine kinase phosphoacceptor specificity. Mol. Cell 53, 140–147 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.11.013
Yaffe, M. B., Leparc, G. G., Lai, J., Obata, T., Volinia, S., & Cantley, L. C. A motif-based profile scanning approach for genome-wide prediction of signaling pathways. Nat. Biotechnol. 19, 348–353 (2001).
Yaron, T. M. et al. Host protein kinases required for SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid phosphorylation and viral replication. Sci. Signal. 15, eabm0808 (2022).
doi: 10.1126/scisignal.abm0808
Fischer, E. H., Graves, D. J., Crittenden, E. R. S. & Krebs, E. G. Structure of the site phosphorylated in the phosphorylase b to a reaction. J. Biol. Chem. 234, 1698–1704 (1959).
doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)69910-7
Xu, B.-e, Wilsbacher, J. L., Collisson, T. & Cobb, M. H. The N-terminal ERK-binding site of MEK1 is required for efficient feedback phosphorylation by ERK2 in vitro and ERK activation in vivo. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 34029–34035 (1999).
doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.48.34029
Malumbres, M. et al. Cyclin-dependent kinases: a family portrait. Nat. Cell Biol. 11, 1275–1276 (2009).
doi: 10.1038/ncb1109-1275
Eick, D. & Geyer, M. The RNA polymerase II carboxy-terminal domain (CTD) code. Chem. Rev. 113, 8456–8490 (2013).
doi: 10.1021/cr400071f
Cohen, P. & Frame, S. The renaissance of GSK3. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2, 769–776 (2001).
doi: 10.1038/35096075
Meng, Z. et al. MAP4K family kinases act in parallel to MST1/2 to activate LATS1/2 in the Hippo pathway. Nat. Commun. 6, 8357 (2015).
doi: 10.1038/ncomms9357
Shaywitz, A. J. & Greenberg, M. E. CREB: a stimulus-induced transcription factor activated by a diverse array of extracellular signals. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 68, 821–861 (1999).
doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.68.1.821
Rigbolt, K. T. & Blagoev, B. Quantitative phosphoproteomics to characterize signaling networks. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 23, 863–871 (2012).
Tagliabracci, V. S. et al. A single kinase generates the majority of the secreted phosphoproteome. Cell 161, 1619–1632 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.028
Needham, E. J. et al. Phosphoproteomics of acute cell stressors targeting exercise signaling networks reveal drug interactions regulating protein secretion. Cell Rep. 29, 1524–1538 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.10.001
Kettenbach, A. N. et al. Quantitative phosphoproteomics identifies substrates and functional modules of Aurora and Polo-like kinase activities in mitotic cells. Sci. Signal. 4, rs5 (2011).
doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2001497
van Vugt, M. A. et al. A mitotic phosphorylation feedback network connects Cdk1, Plk1, 53BP1, and Chk2 to inactivate the G2/M DNA damage checkpoint. PLoS Biol. 8, e1000287 (2010).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000287
Macůrek, L. et al. Polo-like kinase-1 is activated by aurora A to promote checkpoint recovery. Nature 455, 119–123 (2008).
doi: 10.1038/nature07185
Winter, M. et al. Deciphering the acute cellular phosphoproteome response to irradiation with X-rays, protons and carbon ions. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 16, 855–872 (2017).
doi: 10.1074/mcp.M116.066597
Reinhardt, H. C., Aslanian, A. S., Lees, J. A. & Yaffe, M. B. p53-deficient cells rely on ATM-and ATR-mediated checkpoint signaling through the p38MAPK/MK2 pathway for survival after DNA damage. Cancer Cell 11, 175–189 (2007).
doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2006.11.024
Reinhardt, H. C. & Yaffe, M. B. Kinases that control the cell cycle in response to DNA damage: Chk1, Chk2, and MK2. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 21, 245–255 (2009).
doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2009.01.018
Xie, S. et al. Plk3 functionally links DNA damage to cell cycle arrest and apoptosis at least in part via the p53 pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 43305–43312 (2001).
doi: 10.1074/jbc.M106050200
Gonzalez-Hunt, C. et al. Mitochondrial DNA damage as a potential biomarker of LRRK2 kinase activity in LRRK2 Parkinson’s disease. Sci. Rep. 10, 17293 (2020).
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-74195-6
Humphrey, S. J. et al. Dynamic adipocyte phosphoproteome reveals that Akt directly regulates mTORC2. Cell Metab. 17, 1009–1020 (2013).
doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2013.04.010
Mertins, P. et al. An integrative framework reveals signaling-to-transcription events in toll-like receptor signaling. Cell Rep. 19, 2853–2866 (2017).
doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.06.016
Johnson, G. L. & Lapadat, R. Mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways mediated by ERK, JNK, and p38 protein kinases. Science 298, 1911–1912 (2002).
doi: 10.1126/science.1072682
Miller, C. J. & Turk, B. E. Homing in: mechanisms of substrate targeting by protein kinases. Trends Biochem. Sci 43, 380–394 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2018.02.009
Linding, R. et al. Systematic discovery of in vivo phosphorylation networks. Cell 129, 1415–1426 (2007).
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.05.052
Joughin, B. A., Liu, C., Lauffenburger, D. A., Hogue, C. W. & Yaffe, M. B. Protein kinases display minimal interpositional dependence on substrate sequence: potential implications for the evolution of signalling networks. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 367, 2574–2583 (2012).
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0010
Baek, M. et al. Accurate prediction of protein structures and interactions using a three-track neural network. Science 373, 871–876 (2021).
doi: 10.1126/science.abj8754
Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021).
doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2
Sanz-García, M. et al. Substrate profiling of human vaccinia-related kinases identifies coilin, a Cajal body nuclear protein, as a phosphorylation target with neurological implications. J. Proteom. 75, 548–560 (2011).
doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2011.08.019
Sekiguchi, M. et al. Identification of amphiphysin 1 as an endogenous substrate for CDKL5, a protein kinase associated with X-linked neurodevelopmental disorder. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 535, 257–267 (2013).
doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2013.04.012
Wynn, R. M., Davie, J. R., Cox, R. P. & Chuang, D. T. Chaperonins GroEL and GroES promote assembly of heterotetramers (α2β2) of mammalian mitochondrial branched-chain alpha-keto acid decarboxylase in Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 267, 12400–12403 (1992).
doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)42286-7
Song, J.-L., Li, J., Huang, Y.-S. & Chuang, D. T. Encapsulation of an 86-kDa assembly intermediate inside the cavities of GroEL and its single-ring variant SR1 by GroES. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 2515–2521 (2003).
doi: 10.1074/jbc.M209705200
Thevakumaran, N. et al. Crystal structure of a BRAF kinase domain monomer explains basis for allosteric regulation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 22, 37–43 (2015).
doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2924
Luzwick, J. W., Nam, E. A., Zhao, R. & Cortez, D. Mutation of serine 1333 in the ATR HEAT repeats creates a hyperactive kinase. PLoS ONE 9, e99397 (2014).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099397
Albanese, S. K. et al. An open library of human kinase domain constructs for automated bacterial expression. Biochemistry 57, 4675–4689 (2018).
doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.7b01081
Manceau, V. et al. Major phosphorylation of SF1 on adjacent Ser‐Pro motifs enhances interaction with U2AF65. FEBS J. 273, 577–587 (2006).
doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2005.05091.x
Melero, R. et al. Structures of SMG1-UPFs complexes: SMG1 contributes to regulate UPF2-dependent activation of UPF1 in NMD. Structure 22, 1105–1119 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.str.2014.05.015
Najjar, M. et al. Structure guided design of potent and selective ponatinib-based hybrid inhibitors for RIPK1. Cell Rep. 10, 1850–1860 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.02.052
Czudnochowski, N., Bösken, C. A. & Geyer, M. Serine-7 but not serine-5 phosphorylation primes RNA polymerase II CTD for P-TEFb recognition. Nat. Commun. 3, 842 (2012).
doi: 10.1038/ncomms1846
Greifenberg, A. K. et al. Structural and functional analysis of the Cdk13/Cyclin K complex. Cell Rep. 14, 320–331 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.12.025
Liu, Y. et al. Chemical biology toolkit for DCLK1 reveals connection to RNA processing. Cell Chem. Biol. 27, 1229–1240 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2020.07.011
Ferguson, F. M. et al. Discovery of a selective inhibitor of doublecortin like kinase 1. Nat. Chem. Biol. 16, 635–643 (2020).
doi: 10.1038/s41589-020-0506-0
Huang, H.-T. et al. MELK is not necessary for the proliferation of basal-like breast cancer cells. eLife 6, e26693 (2017).
doi: 10.7554/eLife.26693
Wan, L. C. et al. Proteomic analysis of the human KEOPS complex identifies C14ORF142 as a core subunit homologous to yeast Gon7. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, 805–817 (2017).
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw1181
Villa, F. et al. Crystal structure of the catalytic domain of Haspin, an atypical kinase implicated in chromatin organization. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 20204–20209 (2009).
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0908485106
Bae, S. J., Ni, L. & Luo, X. STK25 suppresses Hippo signaling by regulating SAV1-STRIPAK antagonism. eLife 9, e54863 (2020).
doi: 10.7554/eLife.54863
Murillo-de-Ozores, A. R., Chávez-Canales, M., de Los Heros, P., Gamba, G. & Castañeda-Bueno, M. Physiological processes modulated by the chloride-sensitive WNK-SPAK/OSR1 kinase signaling pathway and the cation-coupled chloride cotransporters. Front. Physiol. 11, 585907 (2020).
Filippi, B. M. et al. MO25 is a master regulator of SPAK/OSR1 and MST3/MST4/YSK1 protein kinases. EMBO J. 30, 1730–1741 (2011).
doi: 10.1038/emboj.2011.78
Zhou, P. et al. Alpha-kinase 1 is a cytosolic innate immune receptor for bacterial ADP-heptose. Nature 561, 122–126 (2018).
doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0433-3
Taipale, M. et al. Quantitative analysis of HSP90-client interactions reveals principles of substrate recognition. Cell 150, 987–1001 (2012).
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.06.047
Klatt, F. et al. A precisely positioned MED12 activation helix stimulates CDK8 kinase activity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 2894–2905 (2020).
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1917635117
Balasuriya, N. et al. Phosphorylation-dependent substrate selectivity of protein kinase B (AKT1). J. Biol. Chem. 295, 8120–8134 (2020).
doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA119.012425
Zheng, Y. et al. Regulation of folate and methionine metabolism by multisite phosphorylation of human methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase. Sci. Rep. 9, 4190 (2019).
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-40950-7
Robert, T. et al. Development of a CDK10/CycM in vitro kinase screening assay and identification of first small-molecule inhibitors. Front. Chem. 8, 147 (2020).
doi: 10.3389/fchem.2020.00147
Ferguson, F. M. et al. Discovery of covalent CDK14 inhibitors with pan-TAIRE family specificity. Cell Chem. Biol. 26, 804–817 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2019.02.015
Rimel, J. K. et al. Selective inhibition of CDK7 reveals high-confidence targets and new models for TFIIH function in transcription. Genes Dev. 34, 1452–1473 (2020).
doi: 10.1101/gad.341545.120
Wagih, O. ggseqlogo: a versatile R package for drawing sequence logos. Bioinformatics 33, 3645–3647 (2017).
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx469
Modi, V. & Dunbrack Jr, R. L. A structurally validated multiple sequence alignment of 497 human protein kinase domains. Sci. Rep. 9, 19790 (2019).
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56499-4
Berman, H. M. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 235–242 (2000).
doi: 10.1093/nar/28.1.235