Factors influencing postpartum haemorrhage detection and management and the implementation of a new postpartum haemorrhage care bundle (E-MOTIVE) in Kenya, Nigeria, and South Africa.
Behaviour Change Wheel
Clinical care bundle
Formative research
Implementation interventions
Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs)
Maternal health
Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH)
Qualitative interviews
Journal
Implementation science : IS
ISSN: 1748-5908
Titre abrégé: Implement Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101258411
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 01 2023
11 01 2023
Historique:
received:
05
06
2022
accepted:
14
11
2022
entrez:
11
1
2023
pubmed:
12
1
2023
medline:
14
1
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) is the leading cause of global maternal deaths, accounting for 30-50% of maternal deaths in sub-Saharan Africa. Most PPH-related deaths are preventable with timely detection and initiation of care, which may be facilitated by using a clinical care bundle. We explore influences on current PPH detection and management and on the future implementation of a new PPH bundle (E-MOTIVE) in low-resource, high-burden settings. Semi-structured qualitative interviews based on the Theoretical Domains Framework were conducted with 45 healthcare providers across nine hospitals in Nigeria, Kenya and South Africa, to identify barriers and enablers to current PPH detection and management and future implementation of a new PPH care bundle. Data were analysed using thematic and framework analysis. The Behaviour Change Wheel was used to identify potential interventions to address identified barriers and enablers. Influences on current PPH detection and management fell under 12 domains: Environmental Context and Resources (drug and staff shortages), Skills (limited in-service training), Knowledge (variable understanding of the recommended practice), Behaviour Regulation (limited quality improvement culture), Beliefs about Consequences (drawbacks from inaccurate detection), Emotion (stress from the unpredictability of PPH), Social Influence (teamwork), Memory, Attention and Decision-making (limited guideline use), Social/Professional Role and Identity (role clarity), Beliefs about Capabilities (confidence in managing PPH), Reinforcement (disciplinary procedures) and Goals (PPH as a priority). Influences on bundle uptake included: Beliefs about Consequences (perceived benefits of new blood loss measurement tool), Environmental Context and Resources (high cost of drugs and new tools), Memory, Attention and Decision-making (concerns about whether bundle fits current practice), Knowledge (not understanding 'bundled' approach), Social Influence (acceptance by women and staff) and Intention (limited acceptance of 'bundled' approach over existing practice). These influences were consistent across countries. Proposed interventions included: Education, Training, Modelling (core and new skills), Enablement (monitoring uptake), Persuasion (leadership role) and Environmental Restructuring (PPH emergency trolley/kit). A wide range of individual, socio-cultural and environmental barriers and enablers to improving PPH detection and management exist in these settings. We identified a range of interventions that could improve PPH care and the implementation of new care bundles in this context. ClinicalTrials.gov : NCT04341662.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) is the leading cause of global maternal deaths, accounting for 30-50% of maternal deaths in sub-Saharan Africa. Most PPH-related deaths are preventable with timely detection and initiation of care, which may be facilitated by using a clinical care bundle. We explore influences on current PPH detection and management and on the future implementation of a new PPH bundle (E-MOTIVE) in low-resource, high-burden settings.
METHODS
Semi-structured qualitative interviews based on the Theoretical Domains Framework were conducted with 45 healthcare providers across nine hospitals in Nigeria, Kenya and South Africa, to identify barriers and enablers to current PPH detection and management and future implementation of a new PPH care bundle. Data were analysed using thematic and framework analysis. The Behaviour Change Wheel was used to identify potential interventions to address identified barriers and enablers.
RESULTS
Influences on current PPH detection and management fell under 12 domains: Environmental Context and Resources (drug and staff shortages), Skills (limited in-service training), Knowledge (variable understanding of the recommended practice), Behaviour Regulation (limited quality improvement culture), Beliefs about Consequences (drawbacks from inaccurate detection), Emotion (stress from the unpredictability of PPH), Social Influence (teamwork), Memory, Attention and Decision-making (limited guideline use), Social/Professional Role and Identity (role clarity), Beliefs about Capabilities (confidence in managing PPH), Reinforcement (disciplinary procedures) and Goals (PPH as a priority). Influences on bundle uptake included: Beliefs about Consequences (perceived benefits of new blood loss measurement tool), Environmental Context and Resources (high cost of drugs and new tools), Memory, Attention and Decision-making (concerns about whether bundle fits current practice), Knowledge (not understanding 'bundled' approach), Social Influence (acceptance by women and staff) and Intention (limited acceptance of 'bundled' approach over existing practice). These influences were consistent across countries. Proposed interventions included: Education, Training, Modelling (core and new skills), Enablement (monitoring uptake), Persuasion (leadership role) and Environmental Restructuring (PPH emergency trolley/kit).
CONCLUSIONS
A wide range of individual, socio-cultural and environmental barriers and enablers to improving PPH detection and management exist in these settings. We identified a range of interventions that could improve PPH care and the implementation of new care bundles in this context.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov : NCT04341662.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36631821
doi: 10.1186/s13012-022-01253-0
pii: 10.1186/s13012-022-01253-0
pmc: PMC9832403
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04341662']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1Subventions
Organisme : World Health Organization
ID : 001
Pays : International
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/T038985/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Sep 18;13:117
pubmed: 24047204
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Sep 28;15:230
pubmed: 26415952
Ann Behav Med. 2013 Aug;46(1):81-95
pubmed: 23512568
Reprod Health. 2021 Jul 14;18(1):149
pubmed: 34261508
Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57
pubmed: 17872937
Lancet. 2003 Oct 11;362(9391):1225-30
pubmed: 14568747
Implement Sci. 2012 Apr 24;7:37
pubmed: 22530986
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Apr 22;21(1):320
pubmed: 33888075
Implement Sci. 2017 Nov 29;12(1):142
pubmed: 29187217
Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Dec;106(6):1228-34
pubmed: 16319245
Implement Sci. 2020 Jul 6;15(1):44
pubmed: 32624002
Implement Sci. 2012 Apr 24;7:35
pubmed: 22531601
Lancet Glob Health. 2014 Jun;2(6):e323-33
pubmed: 25103301
Lancet. 2017 May 27;389(10084):2105-2116
pubmed: 28456509
Glob Health Action. 2020;13(1):1707403
pubmed: 31928163
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020 Mar;148(3):290-299
pubmed: 31709527
Lancet. 2016 Oct 8;388(10053):1775-1812
pubmed: 27733286
Ann Behav Med. 2019 Jul 17;53(8):693-707
pubmed: 30304386
CMAJ. 1997 Aug 15;157(4):408-16
pubmed: 9275952
Implement Sci. 2015 Aug 08;10:111
pubmed: 26253306
Implement Sci. 2012 May 31;7:50
pubmed: 22651257
BMJ. 2021 Sep 30;374:n2061
pubmed: 34593508
Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Feb;14(1):26-33
pubmed: 15692000
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016 Jan;132(1):89-93
pubmed: 26475077
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 13;9:CD010980
pubmed: 30211952
Transl Behav Med. 2021 May 25;11(5):1049-1065
pubmed: 32749460
Implement Sci. 2011 Apr 23;6:42
pubmed: 21513547