Is individual perfusion dose-response different than ventilation dose-response for lung cancer patients treated with radiotherapy?
Journal
The British journal of radiology
ISSN: 1748-880X
Titre abrégé: Br J Radiol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0373125
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 Jan 2023
12 Jan 2023
Historique:
pmc-release:
01
02
2024
entrez:
12
1
2023
pubmed:
13
1
2023
medline:
13
1
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Current ventilation and perfusion dose-response studies focus on single-modalities (ventilation or perfusion) and perform pulmonary-toxicity assessment related to radiotherapy on a population-based basis. This study aims at quantitative and clinical evaluation of intrapatient differences between ventilation and perfusion dose-responses among lung cancer patients treated with radiotherapy. 20 patients enrolled on a prospective functional avoidance protocol underwent single photon emission computed tomography-CT ventilation and perfusion scans pre- and post-radiotherapy. Relative changes in pre- to post-treatment ventilation and perfusion in lung regions receiving ≥20 Gy were calculated. In addition, the slopes of the linear fit to the relative ventilation and perfusion changes in regions receiving 0-60 Gy were calculated. A radiologist read and assigned a functional defect score to pre- and post-treatment ventilation/perfusion scans. 25% of patients had a difference >35% between ventilation and perfusion pre- to post-treatment changes and 20-30% of patients had opposite directions for ventilation and perfusion pre- to post-treatment changes. Using a semi-quantitative scale, radiologist assessment showed that 20% of patients had different pre- to post-treatment ventilation changes when compared to pre- to post-treatment perfusion changes. Our data showed that ventilation dose-response can differ from perfusion dose-response for 20-30% of patients. Therefore, when performing thoracic dose-response in cancer patients, it is insufficient to look at ventilation or perfusion alone; but rather both modes of functional imaging may be needed when predicting for clinical outcomes. The significance of this study can be highlighted by the differences between the intrapatient dose-response assessments of this analysis compared to existing population-based dose-response analyses. Elucidating intrapatient ventilation and perfusion dose-response differences may be valuable in predicting pulmonary toxicity in lung cancer patients post-radiotherapy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36633096
doi: 10.1259/bjr.20220119
pmc: PMC9975372
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
20220119Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : UG3 CA247605
Pays : United States
Références
Radiother Oncol. 2021 Jul;160:120-124
pubmed: 33964328
Acta Oncol. 2012 Nov;51(8):975-83
pubmed: 22950387
Radiother Oncol. 1998 Dec;49(3):233-43
pubmed: 10075256
Med Phys. 2010 Mar;37(3):1261-72
pubmed: 20384264
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Nov 1;60(3):748-58
pubmed: 15465191
Nature. 1994 Jul 21;370(6486):199-201
pubmed: 8028666
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Jul 1;92(3):683-90
pubmed: 25936813
J Thorac Oncol. 2011 Jan;6(1):71-8
pubmed: 21119546
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Jul 1;74(3):781-9
pubmed: 19084355
Med Phys. 2018 Oct;45(10):4483-4492
pubmed: 30047588
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002 Jan 1;52(1):58-67
pubmed: 11777622
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Jun 1;86(2):366-71
pubmed: 23474113
Vet J. 2000 Jul;160(1):25-32
pubmed: 10950132
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Mar 15;82(4):e631-8
pubmed: 22197235
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000 Jun 1;47(3):681-90
pubmed: 10837952
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Oct 1;93(2):408-17
pubmed: 26275510
Phys Med Biol. 2006 Feb 21;51(4):777-91
pubmed: 16467578
Nucl Med Commun. 2002 Nov;23(11):1107-13
pubmed: 12411840
Semin Nucl Med. 2010 Nov;40(6):467-73
pubmed: 20920636
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004 Oct;20(4):540-54
pubmed: 15390146
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1993 Jul 15;26(4):659-68
pubmed: 8330998
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000 Jul 15;47(5):1201-8
pubmed: 10889373
Acta Oncol. 2015;54(9):1350-4
pubmed: 26203930
Med Phys. 2012 Jan;39(1):289-98
pubmed: 22225299
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015 Jul;42(8):1315-24
pubmed: 25862455
Radiother Oncol. 2012 Jul;104(1):52-7
pubmed: 22578806
Radiographics. 2012 Sep-Oct;32(5):1329-41
pubmed: 22977021
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2007 Jan;102(1):468-76
pubmed: 16990505
Radiother Oncol. 1993 Nov;29(2):110-6
pubmed: 8310136
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020 Apr 1;106(5):1063-1070
pubmed: 31983558
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2014 Apr;58(2):214-22
pubmed: 24373453